Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is Honda Accord SV4 still worth it?, Planning some modifications too.

views
     
Joseph Hahn
post Apr 19 2010, 04:48 PM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
^ Refer your thread.

QUOTE(jackyleo009 @ April 8, 2010, 11:32 pm)
F22B1 Vtec also consume many fuel?
*
Should be about 450km for 50L. Manual la.

imjustakit
post Apr 21 2010, 03:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
noobie questions here,

i found a 2.0 manual earlier sv4 with fine chasis in the market, isit 2.0 manual transmission has the better fc than the 2.0 or 2.2 auto? how far can i go with full tank petrol?

*im not a heavy footer and currently driving a kelisa 1.0m with rm20 of petrol i can go for around 195km = rm0.102/km which my bro gonna take over it soon, wondering if i take the sv4 will it double the cost of the petrol?

i clearly know tat the old accord is much steadier and better performance than kelisa, jus simply find out the petrol figure of it.. thx for sharing smile.gif

This post has been edited by imjustakit: Apr 21 2010, 04:01 AM
jackwylde
post Apr 21 2010, 04:19 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: kemaman, terengganu


SV4 FTW!!
Joseph Hahn
post Apr 21 2010, 09:34 AM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
QUOTE(imjustakit @ Apr 21 2010, 03:21 AM)
noobie questions here,

i found a 2.0 manual earlier sv4 with fine chasis in the market, isit 2.0 manual transmission has the better fc than the 2.0 or 2.2 auto? how far can i go with full tank petrol?

*im not a heavy footer and currently driving a kelisa 1.0m with rm20 of petrol i can go for around 195km = rm0.102/km which my bro gonna take over it soon, wondering if i take the sv4 will it double the cost of the petrol?

i clearly know tat the old accord is much steadier and better performance than kelisa, jus simply find out the petrol figure of it.. thx for sharing smile.gif
*
From what i heard, the FC with Auto is really horrible. My 2.2 Manual full tank 50L (should've been 64L dunno where that 14L gone to) can do 450km roughly. Mostly city driving. Not quite sure about FC difference between 2.0 and 2.2 though.

Your Kelisa FC should be around 6L/100km. Based on Fuelly.com, rough average for 94-97 SV4 is around 9L/100km. Mine's doing 10L/100km though
imjustakit
post Apr 21 2010, 12:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
wow, 50l for 450km is consider quite a good fc rite?i mean for 2.2 cars

between 2.0cc and 2.2cc...smaller cc should has lower fc unless it is underpowered?i guess?

thx for ur input anyway joseph smile.gif

This post has been edited by imjustakit: Apr 21 2010, 12:38 PM
Joseph Hahn
post Apr 21 2010, 01:32 PM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
I really have no idea but i think if you're light footed, 2.0 should be more economical. The FC is ok la for an old engine. If overhaul it should be much better since mine already did almost 320k already. rclxub.gif
imjustakit
post Apr 22 2010, 09:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Jospeh heng u wan put ur car pic to poison me meh?haha..i wan see more
Joseph Hahn
post Apr 22 2010, 11:51 PM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
I wish it's my car lol. tongue.gif But at least it's the same color as mine. blush.gif

More here.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/683388

Poison alert!

8 Pages « < 6 7 8Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0147sec    0.35    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 10:44 PM