Small turbo engines are usually manufactured to a higher precision level with better materials than standard NA.
Bigger doesn't necessarily mean more expensive.
1L Turbo engine vs 1.5L Natural aspiration engine
1L Turbo engine vs 1.5L Natural aspiration engine
|
|
Aug 8 2019, 12:54 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,193 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Small turbo engines are usually manufactured to a higher precision level with better materials than standard NA.
Bigger doesn't necessarily mean more expensive. |
|
|
Aug 8 2019, 01:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,193 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(zerorating @ Aug 8 2019, 01:05 PM) if you talk about civic type r engine, probably yes. Not really, cheapo peasant car engine that uses low pressure turbo, like the ones used in Conti engines, they are manufactured in higher precision. It is also the reason why they are more susceptible to damaging easier, especially with wrongly specced oils. A low pressure turbo car usually will give you more power and lower FC deficit vs the same amount of gains doing just NA. Because of that manufacturers opt to go Turbo to get more power whilst keeping to emission requirements. But this comes at a cost of a more fragile engine. To compensate, they use better materials, but most of the people in this country abuse it and don't know how to mod it. Spoil it easilybut cheepo peasant car engine, i think those extra cost just to cover up warranty claim if problem arise, material probably slight better oni. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0284sec
0.50
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:48 PM |