Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> 1L Turbo engine vs 1.5L Natural aspiration engine

views
     
daijoubu
post Aug 8 2019, 12:54 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




Small turbo engines are usually manufactured to a higher precision level with better materials than standard NA.

Bigger doesn't necessarily mean more expensive.
daijoubu
post Aug 8 2019, 01:19 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(zerorating @ Aug 8 2019, 01:05 PM)
if you talk about civic type r engine, probably yes.
but cheepo peasant car engine, i think those extra cost just to cover up warranty claim if problem arise, material probably slight better oni.
*
Not really, cheapo peasant car engine that uses low pressure turbo, like the ones used in Conti engines, they are manufactured in higher precision. It is also the reason why they are more susceptible to damaging easier, especially with wrongly specced oils. A low pressure turbo car usually will give you more power and lower FC deficit vs the same amount of gains doing just NA. Because of that manufacturers opt to go Turbo to get more power whilst keeping to emission requirements. But this comes at a cost of a more fragile engine. To compensate, they use better materials, but most of the people in this country abuse it and don't know how to mod it. Spoil it easily

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0284sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:48 PM