1L Turbo engine vs 1.5L Natural aspiration engine
|
|
 Aug 8 2019, 11:52 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,836 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Cheras, Selangor  
|
if you directly compare toyota and ford (as what your pic suggest)... of course toyota 4 cylinder cost less, cause there are less engineering and less innovation go into the design, needless to say just recycle old technology to reuse
|
|
|
Aug 8 2019, 12:28 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,836 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Cheras, Selangor
|
QUOTE(arza04 @ Aug 8 2019, 12:03 PM) Ahh just stop with downsizing engine and put turbo to budget car. It not suitable here, after warranty end the nightmare comes Just do turbo diesel instead... my 2.0 turbo diesel car weight more than my friend's 1.6 petrol turbo yet it has more torque and better acceleration and more fuel economical. I can get up to 850km out of 53L tank on this 2.0, should be even more for those sub 1.6L turbo diesel. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0124sec
 0.42
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:49 PM |
Quote