Greetings
I would like to suggest on something about the Add Reply function.
How about modifying a size of the reply window, like longer or increase the height and width , like showed below?

agree..
sometimes when i type looks like neat
then when actual reply come out, its different.
though i can preview post.
its a utter waste of time.

if we go based on this
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp

there are still 14% using 800x600.

if we go based on goldfries.com (which are mostly M'sians and probably from LYN too)

no 800x600 users at all!! but still that doesn't mean we exclude them eh?

note that what you type and actual output could be different. it depends on the fonts and all.

you could align your lines and characters to try making an ASCII drawing here but output surely can change. so erm......yeah that's it. my 2 sen.

Not if you use the CODE code



This post has been edited by Crazy.SoT.Gila: Jul 1 2007, 07:31 PM

well.. its not a big deal for me expanding the reply window size or not.. but u can always edit it..

Most of us uses quick reply,

and nowadays most of us using 1024x768 and 1280x1024

Safari lets you do that. http://apple.com/safari

Yups ok, I'll consider the suggestion

In case anyone's interested, our visitor screen res breakdown (as reported by Analytics) are:

1. 1024x768 48.86%
2. 1280x1024 18.70%
3. 1280x800 12.20%
4. 1152x864 4.36%
5. 1440x900 3.60%
6. 800x600 3.41%
7. 1680x1050 3.16%
8. 1280x768 1.56%
9. 1280x960 1.01%
10. 1400x1050 0.95%
...

hehe of course la. just that not many people know that.

anywa let wKkaY consider. (to widen this input box is a piece of cake anyway)

for me, i find that the box is fine (using 1680x1050, not a problem. not that many of you write lengthy replies in the first place. )

if i need to write long replies and all, i'll just type on some text editor instead.

EDITED : wKkaY, i noticed that the emoticons were housed in TD tags. so i think what can be done is reduce the TD width for emoticons then the width of the input box could be increased a bit without sacrificing 800x600 users.

well, just a thought.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Jul 2 2007, 04:45 AM

thanks for the consideration wKkaY

5% total revenue is usually the cut off point for a minimum support when cooperations decide to cut down different divisions to save cost... the calculation usually goes beyong this as they need to take into account the division expenses, pre-tax net profit, etc...

but given the minimal number of users using the fossil resolution, i recommend that we increase the quick reply box for the benefit of all...

Done.

The quick reply box remains the same size for now though.

oh~
no wonder...

---

Added on July 5, 2007, 7:44 pmis there anyway to change the reply windows size??
like make a settings in control panel...

This post has been edited by tan_pang: Jul 5 2007, 07:44 PM

thanks
wow, at first its kinda weird to have such this big window for replying

hehe. at the time of my post i thought kalakatu requested to have a wider fixed width. that's why thought of 800x600 users and reducing TD with for emoticons.

now i need to get used to the huge text area on 1680 width monitor.

im so shocked that any suggestions made in the feedback subforum is ever considered

nice big box, im liking it