Smithmaster
ok for first try

1.
bro u cannot have multiple native resolution on a panel.
native pixel means the number of pixels on the panel. native resolution means a 1:1 pixel fillrate on the panel.
so if this is 4k native.. a 1080p will take up 1:4 ( 1 pixel from gpu to 4 pixel on monitor) . 1440p.. this tricky. it will be 4:9

based ok few reviews of songram e240..
looks like this monitor has mutiple EDID tables. this is now da question mark. seems like scalar trickery here.

from what i know. refresh rate u cannot go above the native refresh rate at native resolution at lower resolution.
max is the oc range. if this is a 4k panel@60hz and it can do 144hz @1440p its only one way.. its a 4k panel thats actually 144hz but because it only comes with dp 1.2.. theres the limitation. think about it. if not ppl can run 1080p 240hz from their 1440p 165hz panels.

so hence da question on da panels native pixel rate.

2.
this monitor in SG etc had so many variation. there was a 4k 75hz... another one claiming HDR etc etc

3.
your 144hz issue could be from cheap dp cable. try to get a better one.

4.
if possible. can u set in amd driver no scaling. take pic with your phone on desktop icons with windows scaling set at 100%.

5.
video upload to googlr drive/one drive and share.

show u a scalar trickery on a monitor thats 1440p native
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qZkchZj0S...p0j5FNHtW13Ze6M

will upload to youtube but it will take sometime for youtube to process it for higher resolution. so just wait


see how 150% everything at 4k looks sharp and passable.. but when i set at 100% windows scaling setting.. see how the V, W on the desktop goes whack..... on HDR things will go bonkers even more for 100% windows scaling.

tommorow i will bring my asus pg27q 4k60hz gsync monitor and show you the difference in a large dataset of excel spreadsheet video. the difference with trickery and real 1:1.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 28 2019, 03:20 PM

errr afaik it has
hdmi 2.0 x 1
hdmi 1.4 x 2
dp theres no mention what version it is...

dp cable that i use atm...

https://shopee.com.my/product/35477279/1545165903

its good and bought it because of the length.

scalar trickery is really interesting..on innolux panels it only has a single EDID so u wont get multiple so call native resolution to trick windows... thats what your button does. gsync monitors do it for OC.

so on single EDID setting 4k.. 60.. u get a full 4k. looks good to a point with u set no scaling it will shrink as if 1:1 pixel count on monitor when u set to 1440p.. tricky right...
but when u set 144hz 1440p.. u get back fullscreen.

hmm good question now is all these scalars are what brand realtek etc etc??

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 28 2019, 11:19 AM

dont know yet.. he hasnt show any indication other than this eyes atm...

theres one more way.. i am not sure about this but u can have a try

the mouse dpi...

afaik moust dpi is based on pixel per inch on the screen.. a 4k vs 1440 at 1:1 native pixel .. when u set dpi like 800 u can see the difference

on scalar scaling.. u wont see any ...

again i am not sure how conclusive and accurate this test is
empire23
ini kita kena tanya abang ni...

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 28 2019, 12:10 PM

cant tell dude...
150% scaling 1 looks better than 100% scaling 1,3 and 150% scaling 3.. looks like your hand shaking since how can it look diff than 150% scaling 3.
but looks like legit 4k...

just take a picture with 100% scaling on lowyat forum main page https://forum.lowyat.net/
dat will confirm it...

eh dude can u show in windows advance display properties is that a 8bit or 10bit...
this is a much more exciting news.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 28 2019, 04:40 PM

think its more of ips glow since it changes on the three photos.

norm. not suprised. maybe its some scalar thing or your dp cable havin issues. some monitor need hdr enabled for 10bit.

dats a 4k 10bit 60hz ips gsync/freesync at rm1.2k.. dats a damn good deal.

data interesting.

i also dont believe its a proper 120/144. cause of what i said before.

but 4k ips 10bit at that price.. is damn good.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 29 2019, 08:32 PM

everything u shown so far shows its a proper 4k bro.. i got 3 screens now with a gsyns 1440p tn, gsync 4k 60 ips, gsync compataible 1440p ips.. ( tested that upscaling thing with this)...

and yours is definately same with that gsync 4k 60 ips except yours even better with a 10bit.

hmm talking about 10bit.. u sure yours cannot support HDR??

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 30 2019, 01:31 PM

for hdr to work properly..... u need to set brightness to max normally.

tn panel tak boleh dude for color accuracy

example asus pg278q.. one of the first gsync monitors
it had excellent color range etc. but color accuracy you can forget it.. blue is not the blue you will get on ips or printing.

tn panels with gsync are still awesome for gaming.

gsyncs are nvidia inbuilt fpga modules into the monitor.
they are far superior that scalars that support freesync.
the price difference is just too much atm because for some reason nvidia cant do asic modules since all panels differ from each other than needs tweaking of their modules.

but for now with rtx gpus especially on 1440p nobody will be hitting under the freesync range.. so all good.