QUOTE(chickenessence @ Oct 13 2019, 03:43 PM)
Notice no one talk much about Msia KLCI ETF..
Is it because the high management fee / expense ratio?
https://www.ambankgroup.com/sites/fbmklciet...es/default.aspxManagement Fee:
0.50% p.a. of the NAV of the Fund
Trustee Fee:
0.06% p.a. of the NAV of the Fund
Other than the high fee.. The one problem I think is the KLCI index itself. Just a few large caps dominate the index. The top 4 companies: Public bank, Tenaga, Maybank, Cimb n Petchem comprise 46% of the index. It's not hard to replicate the klci performance if u hold just some of these large caps without having to pay any fee at all. Esp true for institutional investors.
The other biggest problem is that the ETF is too small. AUM is only abt RM2. 7m. As a result MER is a high of 1.14%, which is close to an active fund, impacting tracking performance. In 2018, KLCI was down 2.98%, but the ETF was down 4.44%. This is the result of high MER n poor market making.
This also mean the manager, Aminvest, is not making money which means they don't care about it. So u can see the poor market making.
So, I will avoid this ETF by Aminvest.
However, I do hold their 0800EA Abfmy ETF for access to Malaysian MGS. That's RM1. 7 billion AUM, 0.1% management fee n MER of 0.17%. Reasonable. I also hold the Affin Gold n China etfs.
This post has been edited by Cubalagi: Oct 13 2019, 08:27 PM