Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 REIT, real estate investment...

views
     
vergil90
post Jul 23 2009, 05:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Puchong/KL/Selangor


QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Jul 23 2009, 01:05 PM)
Jordy,

Your yield computation is diff from my broker, which is about 10.9, later more. ( Rental Yield ). Dividend yield is about 11.9%. Read 2/3 of report attached.

Though an increase in units through private placement, might need to build in the incremental increase in  rental incomes , in order to balance up. Gearing might fall to 27% from 37% if fully placed. Another + point.

Existing Fixed costs tend to drop if operation expands ( just an assumption made ).

Attach report in case you are interested.

RPT , is my concern also.

Regards
*
The computation is simple, 1st half they distribute 8sen for dividend (which i understand is near 100% of their income, excluding RM 2million profit which is paper gain from valuation, though NAV will up a bit). So Assume whole year = 8 *2 = 16cents for current 19 properties.
The additional property add 1.28 cents next year so total 17.28 cents.
Private placement is 20% that's mean next year 120% share the dividend. 17.28censt / 120% = 14.4 cents DPU for next year.
Remember, the private placement is to purchase the 65mil and the extra 10mil is develop it further. So, the total debts still remain the same relative to NAV, but will be lower against total asset, which for me just a small +positive factor.
He he, if they can private placement at RM 1.70 and use extra to pare down debts then good for long term like what Cherroy say(short term not good coz now low interest environment) thumbup.gif
vergil90
post Jul 26 2009, 11:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Puchong/KL/Selangor


QUOTE(ante5k @ Jul 26 2009, 10:35 PM)
regarding the NAV, i think  , for example, if a company go under, property sold, the money will be used to pay off the loan first, only the rest returned to shareholder.

by that, it means if a company have NAV higher then the current share value, we need to take into consideration its borrowings/gearing.

example, if the current NAV at RM1.00 per share and gearing at 40%, share price at RM0.90, if company goes under, shareholder get back only RM0.60. Thua losing additional RM0.30 even though trading RM0.10 below NAV per share.

it's always, bondholder first, shareholder second.

do correct me if i'm wrong.
*
What i understand the Malaysian REIT "NAV" = Total Asset - Liability (Loan)
So, if u trust the valuation, theorically any price below "NAV" price is considerable.
vergil90
post Jul 30 2009, 08:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Puchong/KL/Selangor


QUOTE(Jordy @ Jul 30 2009, 06:56 PM)
Must be Stephen throwing his units again. He's been doing this the previous 2 days.
*
throwing? Seems like somebody want to push up the price, one go sapu all unit from 1.80 to 1.84, amazing!
Hopefully after dividend distribution stay above RM 1.70 then private placement will be at good price thumbup.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0406sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 06:19 AM