Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ehh, Even CPUs need hotfix, what! a hotfix for intel processor? LOL

views
     
dopodplaya
post Jun 27 2007, 11:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
Microcode updating is not really new, not just Intel have this problem. AMD K6 series and older Pentium III/4 have the same problem. Newer K7/K8 doesn't inherit this problem.

So update is your best choice if you are using Windows.


Added on June 27, 2007, 11:11 am
QUOTE(gtoforce @ Jun 27 2007, 01:31 AM)
dudes, how come my vista with my fx-60...i dont feel the dual core
its like the system can be so slow like shit and hang (i know this stupid original vista is unstable) but is there anyway to check?
in the task manager, the bars for each cores memang lain
how eh
*
It depends on the application you are using la brother, if multi-threaded app is running, your processor affinity may differ.

Single threaded application is very common and still current, so duel-core CPU seems like uselss sometimes.

This post has been edited by dopodplaya: Jun 27 2007, 11:11 AM
dopodplaya
post Jun 27 2007, 11:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Jun 27 2007, 11:22 AM)
The K7 and K8 also have microcode update mechanisms, and they have had microcode updates IIRC. There was even a big deal in some circles a few years ago because some ppl managed to crack the K7 microcode update mechanism.

edit: Apparently i did remember correctly. Scroll down to bios update V1.4, point 2.
http://www.uabit.com/index.php?option=com_...atal1ty+AN9+32X
*
Yup, many motherboard update includes microcode update but in this case it is an update relating to Windows operating system specifically.
dopodplaya
post Jun 27 2007, 11:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Jun 27 2007, 11:39 AM)
Makes no difference whether it is updated via windows or the BIOS. End result is the same.
*
Yup, but affecting Windows only? Humm, that's kinda funny. It is not the CPU problem that's bother me, it's Windows unreadiness to adapt future hardware.

I don't like to bash Windows, because I am using it and proud of it, just a small funny story like this tickles.
dopodplaya
post Jun 27 2007, 11:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE
In the mobile world, people with the Core 2 Duo T5000 and T7000 need to visit Microsoft's site, while the server guys will want to use motherboard BIOSes if they do not rely on Microsoft Windows operating systems.
From this one, it shows it affects not just Windows operating systems only, but who knows if other operating system might be affected too, not report from the Penguin/Red Devil/Sun or Apple world yet.

I hope people who use non-Microsoft operating system would do a post on this matter.
dopodplaya
post Jun 27 2007, 12:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Aoshi_88 @ Jun 27 2007, 12:02 PM)
Does this affect the T-series cores?
*
QUOTE
In the mobile world, people with the Core 2 Duo T5000 and T7000 need to visit Microsoft's site, while the server guys will want to use motherboard BIOSes if they do not rely on Microsoft Windows operating systems.
Yes.
dopodplaya
post Jun 28 2007, 10:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Aoshi_88 @ Jun 28 2007, 09:29 AM)
What a bout laptops? Reason is i'm getting my laptop tomorrow and i don't think BIOS upgrades for laptops are all that easy to find.
*
QUOTE
In the mobile world, people with the Core 2 Duo T5000 and T7000 need to visit Microsoft's site, while the server guys will want to use motherboard BIOSes if they do not rely on Microsoft Windows operating systems.
you need the soft microcode update via Windows operating system update.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0151sec    0.54    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 09:22 AM