what's else we can blame for this round of transfer window? macam nothing can blame beside the board of arsenal...
Board? Meaning the real owner of the club? If there is no new cash injection, Arsenal fans should be happy to be just top 4. These days, top 4 is not even a thing anymore. Is more like top 6.
Ornstein: “Arsenal have tried to sell Mustafi pretty much every window after they’ve signed him.”
I can’t decide if this is funny or sad lol
This is a good news and also a pathetic news because the person who signed him is dense. The scout(s) is buffoon. And seeing Sven Mislintat got boot out is a joy.
Instead of scouting for new players, we should scout for new owners thou.
Pretty much useless owner with no ambition at all.
Kroenke is here to leech every soul, spirit and cash out of Arsenal FC until everything goes south. At this rate, I would prefer Roman Abramovich than him.
so basically we used almost 80% of our war chest quota just to buy a 18yrs old kid den loan him to france... wat kind of bs is tis... another case 30mils tangan kiri transfer to tangan kanan?? si tua ni nak cuci duit ka? mcmc tlg siasat si mofo kroenke ni pls..
Buy now for 30m but had to loan back to his club for 1 season because his club valued him more than 30m. And since Arsenal is not able to pay more than that or trigger the buy out clause, Arsenal had to agree with such deal. Next season, he could be more than 40m and with more competition from other clubs. Arsenal would get boned even harder for a huge potential superstar 20 or 21 yo player.
This post has been edited by Meis: Jul 12 2019, 12:45 AM
someone talk bullshit about professionalism here. Don't be a dog to your employer la. his contract is one year optional and arsenal exercised it. He also has a right not to accept the exercise la if he does not want to. If he is bad, he will perform bad in his last season so arsenal could sell him.
This is like probation period for someone to work in a Company. both employee and employer can have option to extend or to quit. Koscielny has right to quit the contract too.
Arsenal as a club should let him go if his heart is not in London anymore. What's the point to play someone who has no heart and homesick.
Mutual respect. No point to keep an bad apple or soulless player. He is here for Arsene Wenger. Just to remind you guys.
Which Kos clearly is now. Being a dog to his employer
The option stated in the contract, is that it is optional for Arsenal to extend it and NOT Koscielny, he has no right or claim to whatever decision Arsenal makes,and if Arsenal chooses to extend it, like Arsenal has, then he is contracted to Arsenal for an additional year whether he wants it or not. Simple as that.
And still being contracted to Arsenal, he is liable to whatever terms that is spelled out in that contract he agreed and signed since day 1 till the very last day of his employment which has now been extended an additional year. Any other way and it will be a BREACH in contract.
As things remain the only way out for Koscielny is to buy out the remaining year, or convince Arsenal to mutually terminate. But as far as his contract goes, he is legally contracted to provide an additional year's service to Arsenal because Arsenal exercised that option.
Also please use some common sense, even the stupid example you gave, "both employee and employer can have option to extend or to quit." If the employee has any say or power to decide things even if the employer from your stupid example wants you to stay after probation but you want to leave you can just leave without any repercussion and the employer wouldn't have been able to do a thing. It is obvious it doesn't work that way with football contracts because if it was like as you said, Koscielny could've just left and there would be no consequences. He would not have needed to beg Arsenal for mutual termination and there would have been no need to pull off any of his stupid antics like refusing to go on tour like a spoiled child.
Also if Koscielny had any right to quit the contract at all, he could've just walked away and it wouldn't be regarded as BREACH of contract.
On legal and technical terms, he was being a spoil brat and unprofessional. You are right on that. Granted that, he was also practicing his right to protest. On legal terms, the club can fine him. But however, if the club decided not to do so and forgave him, he might feel regret and go along with the club's decision. Arsenal should have just sell him. The bad apple is screwing up the team's morale.
Anyhow, he is no longer the Kos that we used to know. He is here for Arsene Wenger. Just to remind you guys.
This post has been edited by Meis: Jul 12 2019, 07:55 AM