Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 VDroop... what izzit?, does it affect other brands too??

views
     
TSjinaun
post Jun 24 2007, 12:02 AM, updated 19y ago

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
alot of people says the issue with certain asus board.. in particular the VDroop prevents successfull overclocking.. is that so?

and according to asus website..

QUOTE
Both Asus and third-party utilities such as PcProbII/AISuite/CPUZ shows that my CPU Vcore reading drops as the CPU load goes up.
This also happens after I set CPU Vcore to a set value instead of the preset [AUTO].  Why does the motherboard act like this?
Will this effect the overall stability of my system?


Answer
As Intel specification clearly states Vcc (CPU Vcore) should drop in propotonal to the increase of Icc (CPU current consumption), in order to prevent causing permanent damage to your CPU. When CPU is under stress (in other words, under higher load), the current consumption of the CPU will go up, and the CPU Vcore will then drop to conpensate this change. This is a perfectly normal behaviour, and will not effect the overall stability of your system.

For more information, please refer to Intel CPU datashee, under "DC Voltage and Current Specification".
Source : http://support.asus.com/faq/faq.aspx?no=BB...SLanguage=en-us

can some1 clarify?
superpc
post Jun 24 2007, 09:05 AM

Owned by Doggies
*****
Senior Member
954 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Anywhere!


i think almost all of intel board experience tis Vdrop, it is absolutely normal
u can mod the board to prevent any Vdrop
lohwenli
post Jun 24 2007, 04:14 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


Its a drop of CPU voltage when the CPU is taking a lot of power. Happens when the voltage regulator on the motherboard is not well designed. Usually for socket 775 processors a 4 phase or better power regulator is recommended.

For boards suffering from vdroop, sometimes overclockers voltmod them for higher voltage to compensate for the voltage drop. Setting a higher voltage in bios is also possible, but often results are unsatisfactory. But increasing the voltage has its problems as well, as when the processor is idle, the voltage will be quite high (no voltage drop), which may damage the processor.


Added on June 24, 2007, 4:17 pmAnd yes, it also affects other boards, not just Asus. Asus is often mentioned because they used to often use really small mosfets in the voltage regulator which were prone to overheating (which causes mosfets to conduct less current)

This post has been edited by lohwenli: Jun 24 2007, 04:17 PM
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Jun 25 2007, 04:30 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


yeah... it's normal... tat's y ppl want more powerful PSU ma... if nt Enermax, Tagan and other lords of PSU will eat grass to survive lo... biggrin.gif
TSjinaun
post Jun 25 2007, 08:16 PM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i don't think its becoz of PSU.. its got to do with the voltage regulators on the motherboard
superpc
post Jun 25 2007, 09:51 PM

Owned by Doggies
*****
Senior Member
954 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Anywhere!


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 25 2007, 04:30 PM)
yeah... it's normal... tat's y ppl want more powerful PSU ma... if nt Enermax, Tagan and other lords of PSU will eat grass to survive lo... biggrin.gif
*
even a powerful PSU cannot prevent the Vdrop

SUSInF.anime
post Jun 25 2007, 10:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,695 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Prison Break

QUOTE(superpc @ Jun 25 2007, 09:51 PM)
even a powerful PSU cannot prevent the Vdrop
*
another myth...
anangryorc
post Jun 26 2007, 12:31 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
597 posts

Joined: May 2006


Vdroop is a design, read through this article if youre interested:Vdroop

Most Asus board (C2D) have terrible vdroop, even for asus commando iirc, when cpu is loaded, Vcore will drop because the power circuit design, thus lowering the Vcore than specified in bios, hence, cpu not getting enough juice and restarts. So there be pencil mods for vdroop, for extreme overclockers.

HTH

This post has been edited by anangryorc: Jun 26 2007, 12:32 AM
lohwenli
post Jun 26 2007, 01:59 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 25 2007, 04:30 PM)
yeah... it's normal... tat's y ppl want more powerful PSU ma... if nt Enermax, Tagan and other lords of PSU will eat grass to survive lo... biggrin.gif
*
Not a chance. Even with a PSU with adjustable rails there will still be vdroop if the mobo voltage regulator is not well designed.


QUOTE(anangryorc @ Jun 26 2007, 12:31 AM)
Vdroop is a design, read through this article if youre interested:Vdroop

Most Asus board (C2D) have terrible vdroop, even for asus commando iirc, when cpu is loaded, Vcore will drop because the power circuit design, thus lowering the Vcore than specified in bios, hence, cpu not getting enough juice and restarts. So there be pencil mods for vdroop, for extreme overclockers.

HTH
*
Cool article. Downside of pencil mods and other hard mods is they don't solve the vdroop problem entirely or introduce problems of their own. But anyway only very hardcore overclockers will care... icon_idea.gif
almostthere
post Jun 26 2007, 06:45 AM

Kepala abah ko
Group Icon
VIP
3,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O



HAH!!! Of all the makers to publish something concerning VDroop, it had to be Asus. Brrrrrrr........You should measure the VDroop with a DMM for the P5B series, it'll give you the shivers

And seriously, what is written in that article is rubbishing. If you really want to know about VDroop, read this instead: http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=126

No doubt it's more technical but it explains the real truth

This post has been edited by almostthere: Jun 26 2007, 06:47 AM
TSjinaun
post Jun 26 2007, 08:48 AM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
^^

ok.. i've browse through the tech repository.. and i dun understand it.

so this vdroop is part of the design spec? and not a dreaded problem?
raymond5105
post Jun 26 2007, 09:24 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
This one,i think is something related to P=VI where your P is at a certain valur while your V is dropping,I will increase the value to compensate the loss of V. THus the compensation make the mosfet area become hotter.
lohwenli
post Jun 26 2007, 10:07 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(jinaun @ Jun 26 2007, 08:48 AM)
^^

ok.. i've browse through the tech repository.. and i dun understand it.

so this vdroop is part of the design spec? and not a dreaded problem?
*
It IS a problem, and has to be taken into account during design, as its pretty much unavoidable. Although its important to minimise it, its not cost effective to use a very complex design, so manufacturers make do with simpler, cheaper designs that work and compensate by adjusting the voltage to a value where vdroop is still acceptable. The problem starts during overclocking, as higher power consumption in overclocking will mean more current, which will cause the vdroop to be more severe. There will be minimal vdroop when the processor is at idle, but severe vdroop when the processor is fully loaded, which is bad, as overclockers may increase voltage to high levels to compensate for vdroop, and the absence of vdroop in idle will mean the voltage may be dangerously high (processor damage possible).

QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Jun 26 2007, 09:24 AM)
This one,i think is something related to P=VI where your P is at a certain valur while your V is dropping,I will increase the value to compensate the loss of V. THus the compensation make the mosfet area become hotter.
*
You better double check that, the formula should be V=IR, where V is the resulting voltage drop, I is the current taken by the processor, and R is the equivalent series resistance in the voltage regulator circuit from the sensing point to the processor.

P=VI is to calculate power usage, specifically conversion from electricity to heat (which applies in almost all electrical devices). Although your description does explain a downside of vdroop, it does not explain accurately why it happens. Yes, a poorly designed board suffering severe vdroop will actually make the problem of overheating MOSFETs worse and worse, as the voltage drop (using V=IR) across overheated MOSFETs will result in a power loss and they will overheat more. And the more the MOSFETs are overheated the worse the voltage drop-a vicious cycle. Contrary to your explaination, current (I) can only be increase up to a certain point until the MOSFETs are working at full capacity-which would be limited by overheating (a safety feature of MOSFETs).

This post has been edited by lohwenli: Jun 26 2007, 10:15 AM
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Jul 12 2007, 12:18 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


QUOTE(lohwenli @ Jun 26 2007, 11:07 AM)
P=VI is to calculate power usage, specifically conversion from electricity to heat (which applies in almost all electrical devices). Although your description does explain a downside of vdroop, it does not explain accurately why it happens. Yes, a poorly designed board suffering severe vdroop will actually make the problem of overheating MOSFETs worse and worse, as the voltage drop (using V=IR) across overheated MOSFETs will result in a power loss and they will overheat more. And the more the MOSFETs are overheated the worse the voltage drop-a vicious cycle. Contrary to your explaination, current (I) can only be increase up to a certain point until the MOSFETs are working at full capacity-which would be limited by overheating (a safety feature of MOSFETs).
*
interesting explanation... so how do we know the MOSFETs are working at full capacity...? hmm.gif
ljs2000my
post Jul 12 2007, 03:13 PM

~~~~
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(jinaun @ Jun 26 2007, 08:48 AM)
^^

ok.. i've browse through the tech repository.. and i dun understand it.

so this vdroop is part of the design spec? and not a dreaded problem?
*
Vdroop happens when CPU draw current from the CPU Voltage regulator. At certain times CPU can draw as much as 100A. So Vdroop is unavoidable. There is a vdroop spec and most board designers will design so the droop will not violate the Vdroop specs.


For this Vdroop problem, there are a few ways to improve it and it requires you to rework (change components) the board. It will void your warrenty and so try it at you own risk.

1. Put higher capacitance caps or better quality capacitors around the cpu socket.
2. Fill in the empty capacitor slots around the CPU with simillar capacitors.
3. Do some compensation tuning to the cpu voltage regulator. You will need to know the voltage regulator very well and expert in control theory. Not recommended.


lohwenli
post Jul 12 2007, 09:57 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jul 12 2007, 12:18 PM)
interesting explanation... so how do we know the MOSFETs are working at full capacity...? hmm.gif
*
There's no sure way of finding out unless you are very familiar with the voltage regulator circuit of that particular motherboard. At best, you can guess the peak current of the mosfets during the max duty cycle of the voltage regulator by estimating from the power usage of the processor. If the number you come up with is higher than the rated current for the mosfets, then the mosfets are overloaded. However, finding out the exact current used by the processor is a major problem, even the best estimates can be off by quite a bit unless you have proper equipment and are prepared to hard-mod the motherboard.


QUOTE(ljs2000my @ Jul 12 2007, 03:13 PM)
Vdroop happens when CPU draw current from the CPU Voltage regulator. At certain times CPU can draw as much as 100A. So Vdroop is unavoidable. There is a vdroop spec and most board designers will design so the droop will not violate the Vdroop specs.
For this Vdroop problem, there are a few ways to improve it and it requires you to rework (change components) the board. It will void your warrenty and so try it at you own risk.

1. Put higher capacitance caps or better quality capacitors around the cpu socket.
2. Fill in the empty capacitor slots around the CPU with simillar capacitors.
3. Do some compensation tuning to the cpu voltage regulator. You will need to know the voltage regulator very well and expert in control theory. Not recommended.
*
Sucess rate of 1 & 2 highly depends on how well the voltage regulator circuit was designed in the first place. If the manufacturers decided to cut costs by using fewer or lower quality caps, then you'll improve on it. However, if the circuit was already well-designed to start with, you may just screw everything up, with potential problems like PSU damage (due to surge current at startup), voltage fluctuations (due to the different circuit harmonics),

3 (AKA hard-modding) on the other hand, has been done by overclockers with some success, but like you said, need to be very familiar with the circuit. I did it once before, seriously its not for the faint of heart.
ljs2000my
post Jul 12 2007, 11:02 PM

~~~~
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(lohwenli @ Jul 12 2007, 09:57 PM)
There's no sure way of finding out unless you are very familiar with the voltage regulator circuit of that particular motherboard. At best, you can guess the peak current of the mosfets during the max duty cycle of the voltage regulator by estimating from the power usage of the processor. If the number you come up with is higher than the rated current for the mosfets, then the mosfets are overloaded. However, finding out the exact current used by the processor is a major problem, even the best estimates can be off by quite a bit unless you have proper equipment and are prepared to hard-mod the motherboard.
*
What lohwenli said is true, you will need to hardmod the board to put a current probe the measure the current exactly. I have seen people done before and its not an easy task. The end result is a messed up board after the measurement. But if you dont want to hardmod the board, a good indication if you mosfet is work hard is check the temperature. Usually the at ghigh current draw, the mosfet temperature will be around 70-90 celcius

This post has been edited by ljs2000my: Jul 12 2007, 11:03 PM
kmarc
post Aug 13 2007, 01:03 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



Question on this Vdroop thingy....

Say that I set 1.45v vcore in BIOS. In windows, vcore is 1.41v and at load it drops down to 1.38v (using any app e.g. CPUz or speedfan)

If that is the case, if I compensate for the vdroop, would this put too much strain on the proc? e.g. 1.50v in BIOS, 1.45v idle in windows, and vdroop 1.41v.

I mean, if the CPU is running at 1.41v at load due to vdroop, then theorectically the CPU is only receiving that much amount of voltage rather than the vcore at idle, right? (which is 1.45v in windows or maybe correctly at 1.50v as set in BIOS)

Anybody can clarify this?

Note : I realize that software monitoring is inaccurate but for the drop in voltage, I guess that would be quite accurate right?

This post has been edited by kmarc: Aug 13 2007, 01:04 PM
gengstapo
post Aug 13 2007, 02:09 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 25 2007, 04:30 PM)
yeah... it's normal... tat's y ppl want more powerful PSU ma... if nt Enermax, Tagan and other lords of PSU will eat grass to survive lo... biggrin.gif
*
there is nuthin' to do with psu.. icon_rolleyes.gif
its the board design itself & the worst still, asus board vdroop amongst all board maker
extremeocer
post Aug 13 2007, 02:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor



QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 13 2007, 02:09 PM)
there is nuthin' to do with psu..  icon_rolleyes.gif
its the board design itself & the worst still, asus board vdroop amongst all board maker
*
I hafta gree with that...i have tried a number of ASUS boards from 965p to 975...both have serious vdroop at high OC

So far, the P35 is the best....very very low vdroop or can consider as no vdroop at all.
gengstapo
post Aug 13 2007, 02:36 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(extremeocer @ Aug 13 2007, 02:17 PM)
So far, the P35 is the best....very very low vdroop or can consider as no vdroop at all.
*
its aint the p35 chipset, it the manufacturer fault i believe as badaxe2 also using 975p but very2 little vdr0op smile.gif
remysix
post Aug 13 2007, 02:44 PM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


mmm...some clarification required...i tot i understand about vdroop but...
taking example given by kmarc:
V(bios) = 1.45v
V(idle) = 1.41v
V(load) = 1.38v

so, which one is considered as vdroop? when the proc at load or between bios setting and V(idle) or between all?
extremeocer
post Aug 13 2007, 03:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor



QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 13 2007, 02:44 PM)
mmm...some clarification required...i tot i understand about vdroop but...
taking example given by kmarc:
V(bios) = 1.45v
V(idle)  = 1.41v
V(load)  = 1.38v

so, which one is considered as vdroop? when the proc at load or between bios setting and V(idle) or between all?
*
Dun use MB probe to check....it's best you use a DMM to measure. You take the readings on load and idle. Minus them you will get the vdroop value.
remysix
post Aug 13 2007, 03:32 PM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(extremeocer @ Aug 13 2007, 03:16 PM)
Dun use MB probe to check....it's best you use a DMM to measure. You take the readings on load and idle. Minus them you will get the vdroop value.
*
haha...for those who don have the DMM, then the apps will be the only choice la...
anyway...i just wanna have some clarification (either via apps or DMM), the vdroop is measured between the idle and load, isnt it?
but what about the different between bios setup and windows loaded reading...will that be considered as vdroop as well or not.
just to get things clear about this thing...thanks notworthy.gif
extremeocer
post Aug 13 2007, 03:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor



QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 13 2007, 03:32 PM)
haha...for those who don have the DMM, then the apps will be the only choice la...
anyway...i just wanna have some clarification (either via apps or DMM), the vdroop is measured between the idle and load, isnt it?
but what about the different between bios setup and windows loaded reading...will that be considered as vdroop as well or not.
just to get things clear about this thing...thanks notworthy.gif
*
Like you said...no DMM, then just use the apps. But it's sometimes inaccurate. Some mobo undervolts and some mobo overvolts. And sometimes the apps give inaccurate reading too. So it's always advisable to use a DMM to meassure especially if you wanna do a vdroop mod.

This post has been edited by extremeocer: Aug 13 2007, 03:55 PM
gengstapo
post Aug 13 2007, 04:21 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 13 2007, 02:44 PM)
mmm...some clarification required...i tot i understand about vdroop but...
taking example given by kmarc:
V(bios) = 1.45v
V(idle)  = 1.41v
V(load)  = 1.38v


so, which one is considered as vdroop? when the proc at load or between bios setting and V(idle) or between all?
*
if u gotta DMM, then its better to measure the voltage. both bold value consider as vdroop icon_rolleyes.gif

it should be stable in any situation no matter idle or load..

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Aug 13 2007, 04:24 PM
kmarc
post Aug 13 2007, 04:46 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 13 2007, 04:21 PM)
if u gotta DMM, then its better to measure the voltage. both bold value consider as vdroop  icon_rolleyes.gif

it should be stable in any situation no matter idle or load..
*
Thanx for the clarification. Another question laugh.gif, some people suggested that to reduce the vdroop, you have to increase the vFSB. Is this a myth or truth? (Bring out the mystbusters!!!) laugh.gif
gengstapo
post Aug 13 2007, 05:07 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 13 2007, 04:46 PM)
Thanx for the clarification. Another question  laugh.gif, some people suggested that to reduce the vdroop, you have to increase the vFSB. Is this a myth or truth? (Bring out the mystbusters!!!)  laugh.gif
*
not quite sure as ive try upon my board(asus), still the vdroop margin kinda high

ex, my current BIOS voltage for cpu was 1.400v but when i restart my pc & go into voltage monitoring(in BIOS environment) its fluctuate between 1.344v ~ 1.36v even increase the RAM, SB, SB Pci-e & NB voltages, its still da same rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Aug 13 2007, 05:08 PM
kmarc
post Aug 13 2007, 05:14 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 13 2007, 05:07 PM)
not quite sure as ive try upon my board(asus), still the vdroop margin kinda high

ex, my current BIOS voltage for cpu was 1.400v but when i restart my pc & go into voltage monitoring(in BIOS environment) its fluctuate between 1.344v ~ 1.36v even increase the RAM, SB, SB Pci-e & NB voltages, its still da same  rclxms.gif
*
Yeah, my vdroop was still the same even though I've increased the vFSB. I though it was because of my DS3 (the cheaper good performance mobo!).....
remysix
post Aug 13 2007, 05:16 PM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 13 2007, 04:21 PM)
if u gotta DMM, then its better to measure the voltage. both bold value consider as vdroop  icon_rolleyes.gif

it should be stable in any situation no matter idle or load..
*
i c...in windows, either at idle or load, the voltage seems to be very solid...
it just the setting in bios and windows voltage is different...
so, no problem during the load stage...just that i need to set a bit higher in bios to achieve the target voltage sweat.gif
kmarc
post Aug 14 2007, 07:06 AM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 13 2007, 05:16 PM)
so, no problem during the load stage...just that i need to set a bit higher in bios to achieve the target voltage sweat.gif
Don't go too high on the vcore though..... and watch you load core temperature too.

How much higher are you thinking of going? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by kmarc: Aug 14 2007, 07:06 AM
remysix
post Aug 14 2007, 07:25 AM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(kmarc @ Aug 14 2007, 07:06 AM)
Don't go too high on the vcore though..... and watch you load core temperature too.

How much higher are you thinking of going?  hmm.gif
*
No, no...what i meant by higher is just to compensate the vdroop...e.g. if i want to set 1.4v...then during windows application or on load, i got 1.38v...then i just set the vcore to be 0.02v higher...to get roughly 1.4v...anyway, depending on cooling, on daily i will not go beyond 1.45v...normally i stick to sub 1.4v(drooped to 1.38v) for daily operation
kucingfight
post Aug 14 2007, 05:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
5,784 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam



Anyways to have a better technical understanding,
read HERE
NightRaven
post Aug 15 2007, 02:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Singapore/Melaka


haha guys u cannot change the boards vdrop and vdroop.

vdrop is the difference between bios set and idle real.

vdroop is the difference between idle real and load real.

the only way a board can change its vdrop is bios.

the only way for a board to have less vdroop is mod. u need to pencil mod or something to "overcome" that vdroop. so always remember to set mroe voltage for u get less.

also different fsb and cpu volt ahve different drops and droops. usually the higher u go for ur fsb and mhz, the higher your vcore, the more the droop and drop.

personally gigabyte dq6 series has the least vdroop (virtual 12 phrase)and asus boards like striker and blitz have the least vdrop - 8 phrase
gengstapo
post Aug 15 2007, 09:01 AM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 13 2007, 05:16 PM)
just that i need to set a bit higher in bios to achieve the target voltage sweat.gif
*
haha.. same here lerr, i hafta put 1.400V to get 1.350V.. zZZZz ohH asus laugh.gif
SlayerXT
post Aug 15 2007, 09:22 AM

PRIDE!
*******
Senior Member
2,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



Now setting to 1.485 volt in BIOS to stabilize my oc. In windows range from 1.46~1.48. biggrin.gif
remysix
post Aug 15 2007, 09:34 AM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 15 2007, 09:01 AM)
haha.. same here lerr, i hafta put 1.400V to get 1.350V.. zZZZz ohH asus  laugh.gif
*
hahaha...
based on NightRaven explanation (thanks bro), i only have vdrop i.e. voltage is different/lower than what i set in the bios roughly 0.02v
vdroop...don have rclxms.gif rclxms.gif thumbup.gif
idle or load, it stick to it...using OCCT, u can get the graph for the voltage as well as the temp...always got 0.00% ripple for vcore.
so, yes, DQ6 really has very minimal vdroop if not none at all. it rox
gengstapo
post Aug 15 2007, 10:33 AM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 15 2007, 09:34 AM)
hahaha...
based on NightRaven explanation (thanks bro), i only have vdrop i.e. voltage is different/lower than what i set in the bios roughly 0.02v
vdroop...don have rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif  thumbup.gif
idle or load, it stick to it...using OCCT, u can get the graph for the voltage as well as the temp...always got 0.00% ripple for vcore.
so, yes, DQ6 really has very minimal vdroop if not none at all. it rox
*
nice laa, mine got both vdrop & vdroop
in BIOS set 1.4V then i'll get 1.355v roughly
middle of prime, it woll decrease again at 1.32v/ 1.31v.. blush.gif
remysix
post Aug 15 2007, 10:58 AM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(gengstapo @ Aug 15 2007, 10:33 AM)
nice laa, mine got both vdrop & vdroop
in BIOS set 1.4V then i'll get 1.355v roughly
middle of prime, it woll decrease again at 1.32v/ 1.31v..  blush.gif
*
wow...the vdrop is so bad one...0.045v hmm.gif
so again: migrate!migrate!migrate!migrate to P35 tongue.gif
NightRaven
post Aug 15 2007, 12:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Singapore/Melaka


haha p35 will be the same la bro! u need to see which board...

anyway thanks for the compliment bro smile.gif
8tvt
post Aug 15 2007, 12:40 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
this vdroop problem affect stability issue or not? since >0.05v different consider much for todays cpu
NightRaven
post Aug 15 2007, 01:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Singapore/Melaka


sometimes its does smile.gif makes the difference between stable at 1.45v and 1.4v u know smile.gif
8tvt
post Aug 15 2007, 01:44 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(NightRaven @ Aug 15 2007, 01:10 PM)
sometimes its does smile.gif makes the difference between stable at 1.45v and 1.4v u know smile.gif
*
i'm on AMD.. since this most happens on intel user..
theorically.. it's should does affect the stability.. but just need to know from intel user's experince itself..
any obvious affect? lag or something? hmm.gif
remysix
post Aug 15 2007, 02:04 PM

Hardcore Leecher!!!
******
Senior Member
1,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Deep Beach


QUOTE(8tvt @ Aug 15 2007, 01:44 PM)
i'm on AMD.. since this most happens on intel user..
theorically.. it's should does affect the stability.. but just need to know from intel user's experince itself..
any obvious affect? lag or something?  hmm.gif
*
lagging is more on the performance...this vdroop might effect the stability...running fine and all the sudden, something crashing here and there


Added on August 15, 2007, 2:06 pm
QUOTE(NightRaven @ Aug 15 2007, 12:30 PM)
haha p35 will be the same la bro! u need to see which board...

anyway thanks for the compliment bro smile.gif
*
yup, the same i.e. got the vdrop but not as much as the gengstapo one...heheh...
actually has been poisoning him to switch to p35 but he said retired...it's like retired people but went to the office everyday...seems funny la...

@geng, jk only biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by remysix: Aug 15 2007, 02:06 PM
kmarc
post Aug 15 2007, 03:52 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(NightRaven @ Aug 15 2007, 02:01 AM)
haha guys u cannot change the boards vdrop and vdroop.

vdrop is the difference between bios set and idle real.

vdroop is the difference between idle real and load real.

the only way a board can change its vdrop is bios.

the only way for a board to have less vdroop is mod. u need to pencil mod or something to "overcome" that vdroop. so always remember to set mroe voltage for u get less.

also different fsb and cpu volt ahve different drops and droops. usually the higher u go for ur fsb and mhz, the higher your vcore, the more the droop and drop.

personally gigabyte dq6 series has the least vdroop (virtual 12 phrase)and asus boards like striker and blitz have the least vdrop - 8 phrase
*
Thx for the explanation.

Regarding the vdrop, does all mobo have the vdrop? Will any mobo actually have a higher voltage?

For example, if we set 1.45v for vcore in BIOS, can we safely assume that the mobo will be running at a slightly lower vcore (due to the vdrop) and will NOT be running any higher than 1.45v..... hmm.gif

QUOTE(remysix @ Aug 15 2007, 10:58 AM)
wow...the vdrop is so bad one...0.045v hmm.gif
so again: migrate!migrate!migrate!migrate to P35 tongue.gif
*
Le, mine is a P35-DS3 la, which I consider to be a cheap "performance" mobo (can get for rm400!).
Actual setting in BIOS for vcore : 1.425v

CPU-z at idle : 1.392v
CPUz at load : 1.360v

Easytuner5 at idle : 1.41v
Easytuner5 at load : 1.38v

So, unless you have an "expensive" high performance mobo, I guess you'll just have to live with it..... sad.gif
NightRaven
post Aug 15 2007, 04:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Singapore/Melaka


hey guys. ALL mobos will ahve vdrop and droop. just how much only smile.gif yes higher perf board usually have less droop so.. yea have to live with it

amd also will have smile.gif

yea only effect is stability
SlayerXT
post Aug 15 2007, 05:31 PM

PRIDE!
*******
Senior Member
2,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



@8tvt, since not much talking about AMD oc lately dunno if vdroop does have particular issue.
8tvt
post Aug 16 2007, 12:47 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Aug 15 2007, 05:31 PM)
@8tvt, since not much talking about AMD oc lately dunno if vdroop does have particular issue.
*
i look on cpu-z.. during load the voltage is same as set in the bios..
sometimes even higher on idle.. it's never below what i set in the bios..
the different also not much.. around 0.02v..
i never experince system prob..
but only sometimes when playing certain games lag for least then 1sec.. i suspected that's gpu related..
sniper69
post Aug 16 2007, 05:00 PM

.: One Shot One Kill :. .+|Level 9 Type Shit|+.
*******
Senior Member
7,173 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PCH


well, used to with AMD Athlon64 3000+ Venice E6, BIOS set at "Auto" with software reading (CPUz) at 1.376vCORE, when switched to AMD Athlon FX-60 Toledo, BIOS also set at "Auto" and on CPUz, it's 1.312vCORE doh.gif, there is a dropping... sad.gif

user posted image

FX-60's details
HaHaNoCluE
post Aug 16 2007, 05:42 PM

Newbie
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


mine funny case... set in bios 1.50 but while load the uguru detect 1.52... mine vdruuUP ah??? lol...
kmarc
post Dec 19 2007, 06:07 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



I finally understands the reason behind vdroop from this article which briefly explains vdroop in layman terms. Take a look (2 pages of vdroop/voffset): http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel...aspx?i=3184&p=5

QUOTE
Actuality, load line droop (Vdroop) is an inherent part of any Intel power delivery design specification and serves an important role in maintaining system stability. In most cases, comments regarding unacceptable power delivery performance are completely unfounded. To make matters worse, unjustified negative consumer perception surrounding this often misunderstood design feature eventually forced a few motherboard manufacturers to respond to enthusiasts' demands for action by adding an option in their BIOS that effectively disables this important function.


At the same time, can read about QX9650 running at 4Ghz at 1.28v!!!! drool.gif drool.gif

This post has been edited by kmarc: Dec 19 2007, 06:12 PM
clawhammer
post Dec 19 2007, 06:48 PM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




QUOTE(kmarc @ Dec 19 2007, 06:07 PM)
I finally understands the reason behind vdroop from this article which briefly explains vdroop in layman terms. Take a look (2 pages of vdroop/voffset): http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel...aspx?i=3184&p=5
At the same time, can read about QX9650 running at 4Ghz at 1.28v!!!!  drool.gif  drool.gif
*
That's Pennryn right? smile.gif
Well, sooner or later all of us would own it (when the price drops)
IcEMoCHa
post Dec 19 2007, 09:27 PM

~本田~
******
Senior Member
1,988 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



4ghz @ 1.28v?...=.=
theodore_kh
post Dec 20 2007, 10:22 PM

It's me again !
******
Senior Member
1,297 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


By using application to measure the cpu voltage, a drop in voltage, vdroop happens when the cpu is under load.

Just out of curiosity, would a PSU which is not enough juice shows the same effect in the application readings?

Which means, the readings is a vdroop effect else might be a sign of PSU lack of power?

This post has been edited by theodore_kh: Dec 20 2007, 10:23 PM
Reuben
post Jul 9 2008, 10:03 AM

Firo
****
Senior Member
667 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Sarawak


Just to revive this thread, seems like there's a lot of misunderstanding here.

I'm going to define vdroop loosely in layman's terms and just say that the voltage to the processor DROPS when the CPU is under load instead of maintaining a constant voltage.

Indeed there are some articles which state 'vdroop' as a feature to prevent damage when switching from low to high loads. I am unable to verify this.

However I believe the problem that Asus motherboards face are of a different nature.

The vdroop I experienced in my Asus P5KR, a P35 motherboard causes masses system instability under relatively low overclocks.

Rig:
Q6600 G0 stepping 2.4 ghz default
2 gig Team Xtreem DDR2 1066 RAM
Asus P5KR with latest BIOS
850W Gigabyte Odin
2 x 4850 in Crossfire mode
Vista Home Premium

MY BIOS DOES NOT HAVE THE VOLTAGE DAMPENER OPTION!!!!! Apparently it also doesn't work for the P5K vanilla mods even when listed, only working on the Premium P5Ks.

Tools used:
CPU-Z
Speedfan
Lavalys Everest
Prime95

First of all this is what the situation was before I did any mods

a) When set in BIOS under Auto, voltage is reported in CPU-Z as around 1.385 which fluctuate in around a 0.07 range.
b) When set in BIOS under 1.400, voltage is reported at around 1.375 in CPU-Z which then fluctuates again in around 0.07 range
c) These fluctuations happen when the system is under load for example when PRIMING and the voltage REMAINS below the set voltage.
d) Errors occurred in the Prime95 frequently and system blue screened under both Auto and 1.35 V settings. 1.4 V still crashed but less.
e) Could not OC past 2.8 ghz

I also tried this with my old Intel Core 2 Duo 6400 and could not go past 3.2 ghz.

Now after I applied a pencil mod to my P5KR
a) when bios set to 1.375, it is reported as 1.375. very little fluctuations around the 0.01 range.
b) Under load, voltage was maintained at 1.375 with it peaking up to 1.384 during the transition from low load to high and then stabilized again at 1.375. Nothing to be alarmed about.
c) No errors during Priming at 3.0 ghz with 333 mhz FSB and 9 multiplier. RAM was set at 1:1 at 667 5-5-5-12 just for troubleshooting purposes.

Therefore...if you are overclocking and finding that your system is unstable even at moderate overclocks, time to take out that 2B pencil and start shading biggrin.gif Just google it up P5K pencil mod and find a pic that shows your setup. Do note that the P5K Premium has a diff layout than the regular P5K (and P5KR).
matyrze
post Jul 10 2008, 01:50 PM

Historical tears
****
Senior Member
678 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(Reuben @ Jul 9 2008, 10:03 AM)
Indeed there are some articles which state 'vdroop' as a feature to prevent damage when switching from low to high loads. I am unable to verify this.
*
yes. i read some articles said like that. there will be a very short time that the electric current (or voltage? rclxub.gif cant remember correctly) will jump much higher than it should be during the change from low to high load. this phenomena is the threat to our cpu, as the high current will burn out the cpu. so vdroop is kinda normal. of course OCers are looking to minimize it, but it is something to protect the cpu.

that is what i have read. i cant remember where i read that though. please correct me if i am wrong. smile.gif smile.gif
bryanyeo87
post Jul 10 2008, 03:29 PM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
Vdroop is there to protect both the CPU and motherboard mosfets from from overshoots in load to idle transitions

Take for example, On the P35-DS3, the bios set voltage is the absolute max that the cpu will be fed considering from overshoot from load to idle transitions. That is why upon monitoring, the droop appears to be alot.

This implementation should be apparent in most motherboard that do not have load line calibration.

This "phenomenon" is there due to the current limitations of power delivery designs, as the capacitor and chokes feeding the cpu with power require a "split" second charge up, as well as discharge. It is also apparent in gpu's as well.


However, if you understand this and would still like to mod the board for a lower droop, all you need is a multimeter and a pencil smile.gif

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Jul 10 2008, 03:32 PM
a1098113
post Jul 10 2008, 05:12 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


nice explanation there bryan, though i dont really know what you mean, im noob lor.. laugh.gif
matyrze
post Jul 11 2008, 11:12 AM

Historical tears
****
Senior Member
678 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Jul 10 2008, 03:29 PM)
Vdroop is there to protect both the CPU and motherboard mosfets from from overshoots in load to idle transitions

Take for example, On the P35-DS3, the bios set voltage is the absolute max that the cpu will be fed considering from overshoot from load to idle transitions. That is why upon monitoring, the droop appears to be alot.

This implementation should be apparent in most motherboard that do not have load line calibration.

This "phenomenon" is there due to the current limitations of power delivery designs, as the capacitor and chokes feeding the cpu with power require a "split" second charge up, as well as discharge. It is also apparent in gpu's as well.
However, if you understand this and would still like to mod the board for a lower droop, all you need is a multimeter and a pencil smile.gif
*
so does it mean the vdroop is controlled by mobo to prevent the "limitations in psu design" from burning our cpu?vdroop is really made to be exist by mobo manufacturers intentionally right?so using a pencil to to get a smaller vdroop is kinda suicidal also right?
bryanyeo87
post Jul 14 2008, 07:19 PM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(matyrze @ Jul 11 2008, 11:12 AM)
so does it mean the vdroop is controlled by mobo to prevent the "limitations in psu design" from burning our cpu?vdroop is really made to be exist by mobo manufacturers intentionally right?so using a pencil to to get a smaller vdroop is kinda suicidal also right?
*
it means,

its there to protect your CPU and the mosfets from voltage spikes.

penciling to get a lower droop is not suicidal, just that it lowers the lifespan of the mosfets(quad cores and high speed cpus, oced, etc etc 4ghz >) /cpu (voltages exceeding 1.4v)

So it doesnt matter if the board is a DFI, asus ROG, or even a lowly ECS mobo, they all suffer from the same thing. no/less droop = less life span of both mobo and cpu.
phunkydude
post Jul 14 2008, 08:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,402 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Jul 14 2008, 07:19 PM)
no/less droop = less life span of both mobo and cpu.
*
so, the bigger the vdroop.. the healthier the mobo/cpu is?

my vdroop+vdrop = 0.125v doh.gif

bios-1.325v
idle-1.248v
load-1.200v
a1098113
post Jul 14 2008, 08:38 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


for non ocer yes, for ocer no. There are certain standards or protocol intel spec mobo has to follow i guess.
matyrze
post Jul 14 2008, 10:14 PM

Historical tears
****
Senior Member
678 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Shah Alam


i guess for ocer, they have to find some 'balance' about vdroop..between shortening hardwares lifespan and get higest OCed cpu speed..
bryanyeo87
post Jul 15 2008, 08:56 AM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(phunkydude @ Jul 14 2008, 08:21 PM)
so, the bigger the vdroop.. the healthier the mobo/cpu is?

my vdroop+vdrop = 0.125v  doh.gif

bios-1.325v
idle-1.248v
load-1.200v
*
good la, your spikes to the cpu wont go above your bios set voltage of 1.325v laugh.gif

technically, and theoretically, it prolongs the mobo mosfets and cpu life span. when I said technically, and theoretically, at least that is what it is designed to do



QUOTE(matyrze @ Jul 14 2008, 10:14 PM)
i guess for ocer, they have to find some 'balance' about vdroop..between shortening hardwares lifespan and get higest OCed cpu speed..
*
that is what ocing is all about tongue.gif

a balance laugh.gif
dro
post Aug 1 2008, 05:11 PM

N00B1E5
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL Sentral - Segamat



hey guysss

m not sure which one im suffering from....(vdrop/vdroop)
but on bios.....its 1.385v.....on windows its 1.325v
running e2160 on ip35e

how can i counter or reduce its effect?
tqs guyss

chchyong89
post Aug 3 2008, 10:49 AM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


QUOTE(lohwenli @ Jun 26 2007, 10:07 AM)
P=VI is to calculate power usage, specifically conversion from electricity to heat (which applies in almost all electrical devices). Although your description does explain a downside of vdroop, it does not explain accurately why it happens. Yes, a poorly designed board suffering severe vdroop will actually make the problem of overheating MOSFETs worse and worse, as the voltage drop (using V=IR) across overheated MOSFETs will result in a power loss and they will overheat more. And the more the MOSFETs are overheated the worse the voltage drop-a vicious cycle. Contrary to your explaination, current (I) can only be increase up to a certain point until the MOSFETs are working at full capacity-which would be limited by overheating (a safety feature of MOSFETs).
*
P=I²R
P=V²/R will be better in explaination icon_rolleyes.gif

P=VI cannot calculate any load circuit

since V=IR , subsitude in P=VI, u will get it..

by the way, this give only 10% explanation, more and more i ned to learn by the way laugh.gif
bryanyeo87
post Aug 3 2008, 03:40 PM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(dro @ Aug 1 2008, 05:11 PM)
hey guysss

m not sure which one im suffering from....(vdrop/vdroop)
but on bios.....its 1.385v.....on windows its 1.325v
running e2160 on ip35e

how can i counter or reduce its effect?
tqs guyss
*
pencil tongue.gif
chchyong89
post Aug 3 2008, 04:21 PM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Aug 3 2008, 03:40 PM)
pencil tongue.gif
*
huh? can one mer?? how.. i willing to learn.. thumbup.gif
dro
post Aug 4 2008, 02:05 PM

N00B1E5
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL Sentral - Segamat



anybody done pencil mod on ip35e?
i tink my cpuz is having some inaccurate reading
cuz even wen i push up to 1.55v.....it still says 1.325v
only everest is giving logical reading ..... 1.54v
so i guess my vdrop is jes 0.01......"i tink"
hehe
emilz
post Aug 7 2008, 05:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nothing special


QUOTE(dro @ Aug 1 2008, 05:11 PM)
hey guysss

m not sure which one im suffering from....(vdrop/vdroop)
but on bios.....its 1.385v.....on windows its 1.325v
running e2160 on ip35e

how can i counter or reduce its effect?
tqs guyss
*
using software the value r not accurate u can try to measure it using the multimeter to get the exact value
bryanyeo87
post Aug 8 2008, 08:23 PM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(chchyong89 @ Aug 3 2008, 04:21 PM)
huh? can one mer?? how.. i willing to learn.. thumbup.gif
*
QUOTE(dro @ Aug 4 2008, 02:05 PM)
anybody done pencil mod on ip35e?
i tink my cpuz is having some inaccurate reading
cuz even wen i push up to 1.55v.....it still says 1.325v
only everest is giving logical reading ..... 1.54v
so i guess my vdrop is jes 0.01......"i tink"
hehe
*
go take a close up pic of your buck phase PWM, its a small little black chip just above the ram slots or near that area, the chip is about smaller then a 1 sen coin


you need a multimeter for the next step after u get me the pics

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Aug 8 2008, 08:23 PM
dro
post Aug 8 2008, 09:28 PM

N00B1E5
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL Sentral - Segamat



haiya...

easier if we go yumcha and u teach me at mamak theree
hehe
bryanyeo87
post Aug 9 2008, 01:32 AM

Below the Belt
*******
Senior Member
3,175 posts

Joined: May 2006
come la, im at Petaling Jaya brows.gif

later mamak fella wonder wtf are we doing, looking at mobo hahahah

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Aug 9 2008, 01:32 AM
OC4/3
post Aug 9 2008, 02:27 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Aug 9 2008, 01:32 AM)
come la, im at Petaling Jaya brows.gif

later mamak fella wonder wtf are we doing, looking at mobo hahahah
*
Touch mobo laugh.gif
dro
post Aug 9 2008, 03:26 PM

N00B1E5
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL Sentral - Segamat



they'll prolly say
"GEEEEEKKKKKKKKSSSSSSS~~"
hahaha

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0372sec    0.39    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 02:02 AM