QUOTE(coolice @ Jun 22 2007, 04:00 PM)
regardless the memory size?
i thought lower capacity is easy to reach higher...
LYN's DDR3 Discussion, Talk about new generation's ram
|
|
 Jun 22 2007, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
i thought lower capacity is easy to reach higher... |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2007, 09:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Jun 25 2007, 08:36 AM) So, the real word is, is there a ram manufacturer branded as kiangston or not? lol.. no..  Should be fake right?  Never heard of em.   if got lol everywhere... |
|
|
Jun 28 2007, 09:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
then i think 1333Mhz ddr3 with loose timing just on par with current 1000Mhz ddr2 tight timing.. no use to change to ddr3 except for power saving or can oc to 2000Mhz...
|
|
|
Jun 28 2007, 03:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Jun 28 2007, 01:12 PM) but when u oc to 2000mhz it will be around 10-10-10-20 like that or maybe looser than thatt atleast it's better than 1666 with same timing..if we can pair up with good cpu bus setting should gain better result... as for now switching from ddr2 to high price but lower speed ddr3.. just wasting money only... since cpu speed also around 3ghz.. if everybody can affort quad core should be ok then... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0187sec
 0.50
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:20 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.