Wont be much of a probldm i guess,  restrictions in affordable units' strata titles,  other units ilek restrictions

Can commercial title change to residential? Just some silly question out of curiousity 

In my humble opinion. This project definitely is Not a BBB project. Too pricey. You can't compare the price with current price of Isola now. How many subsale unit that Isola transacted at this moment? U can brag that oh Isola now is RM900 per sq ft . Alright fine. How many actually subsale at this price? Syok sendiri price la. Put a price tag but u see whether there are many unit transacted. In fact certain sales personal are so confident that the property market has recovered as if they are the Oracle of subang jaya. Look at the overhang high rise properties in the market. So many unsold units. Anyway just my 2 cents. U guys can have different opinion and go ahead to buy this project if u feel worth it. To me I personally skip this.

Which floors have the special affordable units? How many units of affordable units per floor?

I think SDP marketing team mistaken the concept of "customer needs".

Customers don't need this DTO shit. That is not a need fulfilling strategy since non of the buyer would get exactly what they want from DTO and as mentioned by others here, it is participated by public hence it is likely that most of the voters aren't even potential buyers.

I believe most customers would prefer the design to be in the hands of a famous designer rather than the public.

What customers want and needs from a property will always be the amenities and offerings. If SDP wanna make SJCC a TOD project then do it, build an entertainment center if not a lifestyle mall instead of constantly coming out with residential buildings.

Their audacity to market "PRIME LOCATION Subang Jaya. Need we say more?" is astounding. Yes we need you to say more because Subang Jaya isn't a prime location. You can't treat it as if it is KL Sentral or Bukit Bintang and stop harping on the dying subang parade mall and mediocre shopping gallery. No one would think of SS16 as their first choice of visit unlike Sunway Pyramid so either you do something about your SJCC or you stop advertising as if SJCC is where people wants to be.

That's why they can't demand that price 

800+ sqf Lot 15 mid level floor is very close to the price of a double story house in SS19 (good condition).

I would prefer to say Sime is jacking up the price than what it is really worth. Otherwise Lot 15 won't be stuck at 60+% take up rate after so many years.

Saujana Residency is only RM700+ psf.... that is the prime of the prime, situated in the middle of everything and it is also the highest end you could get. (Low density mid rise.. less than 20 floors).

Aurora ok ma taikor bean its near esg, what r u waiting for☺😏

Boss,
Not promoting.
Just to highlight the difference.
Both project from same developer but are around 12km apart.
The difference is 🙈🙈🙈

Empire shopping gallery lo😄 u nt sj ppl tht means😄sj stn nt far la maybe less than a km away

Alcove putra heights? That one suck balls.

Facilities are shared with the landed property there if I'm not mistaken.

Plus, if I were to choose in a location like PH, might as well just get landed.

Main point of service apartment is the convenience of being in a city center. Makes no sense to buy SA @ outskirt area.

Wahhh so good the sales even not yet official launch. Subang lang really deep pocket one

Putting on fake stickers are very common marketing gimmick done by developers, not saying SDP is doing it but based on feedbacks given by visitors and forumers here, it does imply SDP is doing it. Not that it is illegal or anything, just another cheap marketing act though.

Also, what you are referring to when you say no more subang view? no more subang view for Aurora or Lot 15?

Who am I gonna trust more? The audited report of SDP or some sticker boi...

hmm... I think I would just stick to hard facts for now..

the take up rate on other developers report refers to actual term of "take up rate". When malton reported their take up rate... if it is like what SJCCarea said then it is impossible for their take up rate on their audited report to be 90+% within a year while SJCCarea said the take up rate seems to be term as "earned income", which made absolutely no sense.

Am I sensing a personal hostility here?

I merely said that I prefer to trust what is stated in the audited report rather than whatever said by a sales person or stickers on a board, is that so hard to believe? Are stickers the real truth?

Last year SDP said the take up rate already close to completion while last year end report shows only 50+%....

If by 50+% = close to completion then I got nothing to say.

That is you.... otherwise such marketing gimmick doesn't exist.

No... SDP did not launch by blocks... they launch by floors... 2 blocks were on sale since first launch then just early last year they open up all units..

when I went for the raya open house, the sales people there told me already nearly sold off all units