Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 DIY HACK MOD, Everything paranormal and ™ infringement

views
     
ccschua
post Oct 26 2008, 09:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(CV6149 @ Sep 15 2008, 06:01 PM)
littleghost,
no problem at all..ur reply is good also..
hhehhe now some comment om this mod i have done to my edifier.

Posted this in edifier thread..no response loorrr
Caps:

4700uf 25v Panasonic FCx2
100uf 25v Panasonic FM x3
22uf 25v Panasonic FC x1
0.68uf Epcos polyproplyene caps
change ne5532 to socket with OPA2134

[attachmentid=593443]
*
I wonder where u get those caps. I am looking for the same value like yours.


Added on October 26, 2008, 9:21 pm
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Sep 15 2008, 04:06 PM)
Najmods,

One problem with your mod.

The caps should be mounted at the bottom at the PCB with shortest leads as possible. The way you're doing it wastes capacitance and adds uneccessary impedance (hence more noise). Proper bypassing mod should be done under the board or under the socket if you're good enough.

EDIT: Why am i replying to a content months ago? LOL.

Anyway nice mod bro. Personally I'm too lazy to do caps mod for my equipments.
*
I always see the Paper in oil PIO doing bypass for some of the power supply cap. The value is typically small like 0.033 uF doing bypass for the 330 uF power supply and even signal caps (isnt that bypass is for power supply).

Can I know whow doesputting parallel a small cap to a big cap is a bypass?


This post has been edited by ccschua: Oct 26 2008, 09:21 PM
ccschua
post Oct 27 2008, 10:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Oct 26 2008, 11:13 PM)
paralleling small cap to big cap isnt really a bypass. That's a failed bypass imo.

Bypassing should be done CLOSE to the circuit, NEXT to the pins. This is to get low impedance for high frequencies as much as possible while avoiding lead inductance and noise pickup.

Bypassing is also done for signals in the signal path because electrolytics simply arent low enough impedance for higher frequencies.

EDIT: Bypassing for power supply is better known as decoupling.
*
"paralleling small cap to big cap isnt really a bypass. That's a failed bypass imo. "

I am confused with this state ment over "Bypassing is also done for signals in the signal path because electrolytics simply arent low enough impedance for higher frequencies. "

I see a lot of bypass for power supply cap. These bypass cap is soldered underside of the PCB in parallel. For example I see this 4 units of OSCON 16V 100uF giving power supply to a DAC and receiver chip.

user posted image

At the bottom of the PCB, the tantalum is added.

user posted image

Can I know what cap is used for bypass, MICA or tantalum or film cap ? I seem to see a mixture, but not sure of which give wht sound.

if bypass what is the value? is it by trial and listen or just take 1/1000 of it.

If bypass for signal, is it true that Paper in oil give more warm.

Please dont mind me asking, I am just a noob to diy.

This post has been edited by ccschua: Oct 28 2008, 12:45 AM
ccschua
post Oct 28 2008, 11:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
Sorry I jump the component.

DIODE, ULTRA-FAST, 1A, 1000V as compare to FAST UF4007, any gain or not. I was told putting the ultra-fast, <5nS will give tighter bass.

Empy,

the silver mica is daylight robbery. if it serve a purpose I dont mind.

Can I use 220pF for the ZERO DAC signal decoupling or I just stick to the design 22pF silver mica.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0240sec    0.93    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:39 AM