QUOTE(Oldskolboyz @ Apr 22 2019, 01:13 PM)
If people call you dxxx sure you angry..
Nolah won't be angry, I'm a huge dxxx anyway
You might be old school, I'm the OG around here
Mercedes and DRB-Hicom
Mercedes AG doesn't own shares in DRB-Hicom, even if they do it is not substantial, obviously DRB-Hicom cannot put their brand name on Mercedes products.
Continental and Sime Tyre
Continental is the majority shareholder (51% IIRC) of Sime Tyre, they can put their brand on Sime Tyre, they can rebrand Sime tyre, they can do whatever they want with Sime Tyre.
QUOTE(DM52 @ Apr 22 2019, 04:14 PM)
I made a mistake. I admit it. Its not a licensing, but its a partnership.
Continental AG which is parents company from german buy 51% share from sime tyre. Then name it Continental Tyres PJ Malaysia Sdn Bhd. It consist of brand Continental for premium product, Dunlop for middle product and sime tyre for budget product.
Sime tyre is history, but its been replace by viking tyres to cater budget customer. So to answer ur question where this all worker goes, I believe they spread between all this company, conti, dunlop, and newly budget tyre, viking.
And I repeat my initial theory, I dont think they stamp low end tyres like viking(since sime no more) and put it become mc6. They cater different target market since one is cater for higher end while cater for lower end customer. And based on positive review from tyrereview uk, mc6 performance is positive which I dont think impossible its from budget resources.
tyereview UK reviews, other than those done by magazines, are just posted by jokers such as myself and yourself. Anyway my personal opinion is that the MC6 is inferior to FK510 because its Falken's UHP flagship. If Falken's flagship cannot best a
Sime Tyre Continental Malaysia engineered and made product, then Falken should just close shop. And that also means Continental's flagship must be godlike too.
This post has been edited by Jason: Apr 22 2019, 05:02 PM