Low quality witness. No wonder Najib walking out of the court smiling today.

Lebih selamat kononnya

Rahman: 'Safer' if funds in Najib's account
5 Aug 2015
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3670553

Dana Lebih Selamat Jika Dalam Akaun PM - Abdul Rahman
http://www.mstar.com.my/berita/berita-sema...5/ahli-umno-ok/

The question asked is actually irrelevant. What does the number of companies under SSM got to do with this case? What does filing procedure got to do with this case? The fact is SSM role is to confirm Najib is a director of the company based on SSM record,

Yesterday Day 3: SoS

...Najib's counsel Harvinderjit Singh cross-examines second prosecution witness Bank Negara Investigation Officer Azizul Adzani Abdul Ghafar about the extent of his involvement in the July 6, 2015, raid on Ambank's Raja Chulan branch.
...Azizul says, earlier during the day, Uma Devi (Ambank Raja Chulan branch manager) had handed him bank documents listing, among others, the opening of bank accounts for Najib, SRC International and Gandingan Mentari. However, this early batch of documents had not contained details of the transactions in question.

List of specific transactions contained in bank documents handed to Azizul on July 6, 2015:
Account opening form for account number 2110020090481
Single credit confirmation advice dated Dec 24, 2014 for RM40 million
Single credit confirmation advice dated Feb 5, 2015 for RM5 million
Single credit confirmation advice dated Dec 26, 2014 for RM27 million
Single credit confirmation advice dated Dec 26, 2014 for RM5 million
Withdrawal transfer slip dated Jan 9, 2015 for RM39.7 million
Instruction letter dated Jan 9, 2015 for RM39.7 million
Withdrawal transfer slip dated Feb 13, 2015 for RM10 million
Instruction letter dated Jan 13, 2015 for RM10 million
Deposit slip dated Dec 24, 2014 for RM40 million

Thank you, I will updated to first page.
Azizul said that the transactions in question not in the early documents, but what are these transactions then?

SRC to Ihsan Perdana & Gandingan Mentari in the name of "fund transfer for CSR programmes"... lolz corporate social responsibility

nothing is gonna happen to him.

DAY 4 IS NOW LIVE!!
https://www.theedgemarkets.com/najibs-src-t...-live-reporting

Some fireworks already flying about today and it's not even lunch break yet!

"Harvinderjit accuses Azizul of lying
10.15am: Harvinderjit suggests that Azizul is lying because he thinks it was not feasible for the BNM officer to classify investigations under Section 4 of Amlatfa only after looking at the documents for 34 minutes after he received them, without having been briefed about investigating the case under the Act by the investigating officer.

Moreover, Azizul had earlier said the investigations were over obligation of reporting by Ambank.

Azizul denies that he was lying.

Harvinderjit: You did not call the investigation officer (Ahmad Farhan Sharifuddin). As a raiding officer, you formed your own opinion that an offence was made.

Azizul: I cannot remember how the decision was made.

Harvinder: Come on, tuan. You have been IO (investigation officer) for seven years. It is remarkable that as a raiding officer, you made your own assumption that another offence was made when the raid had no briefing on [the transactions].

I suggest you are not telling the truth. Are you trying to hide something here?

Azizul: I disagree.

Harvinderjit: Obligation of reporting is the common practice for banking institution. Section 4 offence is related to specific transactions. In your police report, in the 34 minutes between receiving the information about specific transactions from Ms Uma Devi, you formed an opinion that there is also an offence under Section 4 that is related to specific transactions.

Azizul: Possibly. I cannot remember.

Harvinderjit: There is no possibly here, only yes or no. You are not being honest.

Azizul: I disagree.

Yesterday, the witness testified that he received the documents from Ambank Raja Chulan branch manager R Uma Devi at 9.15pm and 9.30pm on July 6, 2015.

The witness also denies receiving a briefing to "not provide an honest statement" before testifying at the trial, as alleged by Harvinderjit.

During re-examination by Datuk Suhaimi, Azizul says he was at the raid from morning until night.

The BNM officer says he scrutinised all the documents given to him by Uma Devi.

After several interjections by Havinderjit on Suhaimi's style of questioning, Thomas stands up as the public prosecutor for the court to give some leeway to the prosecution.

"They have been questioning this witness for five to six hours and we only wanted to ask six general questions," the AG said.

Justice Nazlan asks Suhaimi to refer to what portion of Havinderjit's question which he wished to clarify with Azizul."

all the evidences are black and white
how does the defence team mao bela??

now accuse witness lying :x

Park.

dammnnnn that drama.
When I have time i will compile the story into one coherent timeline

today must be the most explosive day of the trial so far.

"Hearing interrupted, prosecutor says defence is engaging in a fishing expedition
4:03pm: The hearing is interrupted for a while as the defence has asked Ahmad Farhan to produce the documents that BNM seized from Joanna Yu, Crystal Yap and Daniel Lee.

Appointed prosecutor Datuk Sithambaram says the defence is engaging in a fishing expedition by asking for all the seized documents from Ahmad Farhan.

He says the prosecution is not trying to block the documents but making sure the application of documents must be relevant.

“We just want to set the ground rules.”

“Relevancy must be established by them, not us,” Sithambaram stresses.

However, Havinderjit Singh says all the case law cited by the prosecution happened before the trial.

“I’m at trial now.“

Havinderjit says he is entitled by law to discover what the involvement of every witness is.

“I’m asking [for] a document in his possession.”

tak faham

so far, any inclination of him losing?
or still pusing pusing?

Havinderjit shouting out Billion Dollar Whale. Many more references to the book to come?

"Defence asks witness to produce items seized from Yu
4:21pm: However, Havinderjit wants Ahmad Farhan to produce all items seized from Yu, including Blackberry transcripts and so forth.

"Billion Dollar Whale", the book written by Wall Street Journal reporters Tom Wright and Bradley Hope, has now become a figurative "whale" in the courtroom during this SRC trial."


"Harvinderjit cites "Billion Dollar Whale"
4.17pm: Harvinderjit started quoting from the best-selling "Billion Dollar Whale" book, which underlined instant messages between Jho Low and Joanna, to build on the defence's argument that the documents may be relevant"

This post has been edited by Vintage: Apr 17 2019, 04:45 PM

Kuliah ringkas hari ini.

useful sial

Sometimes I wonder I local lawyers have the skills and knowledge to handle this case.

Shafee: News articles provides "a lot of truth"
4.43pm: The point brought up by Harvinderjit is that any communication on the accounts of the former prime minister from the person who was communicating is relevant, as the seized documents may have information on the aforementioned conversations.

Shafee stands up and brings up Tommy Thomas' article in July 2016 on local newsportal Malaysiakini.

"You may ask what is the value of these books and articles," says Shafee.

He quotes: "The US government complaint completely vindicates the brave reporting of Clare Rewcastle-Brown and the Sarawak Report, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, the Edge led by its intrepid editor Ho Kay Tat and P Gunasegaram in KiniBiz. So too the public statements of Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tony Pua, Lim Kit Siang and Ambiga Sreenevasan."

This, he says, provides some basis that referring to these articles — referring to the mobile conversation published in some of the news agencies or blogs — is relevant as the news articles provide "a lot of truth".

Prosecution V Sithambaram responds, saying the argument by Shafee is "interesting".

"I want to put in on legal context. I am a legal man, I am not a political man" he said.

Sithambaram then requests the court to reject the application as the defence said the documents may or may not be relevant, adding that Joanna Yu will be brought in as a witness in time.

"She is going to testify, they can ask her," he adds.