QUOTE(imadeyoureadthis1 @ Mar 20 2019, 10:35 AM)
The thing is we only "get to know him" because of his online personalities exposed by the commenters.We do not have information on how he behaves in real life where we are bound by tacit social rules not to behave negatively. We are too quick to make negative judgement on him.
Let's be honest. We all harbour negative thoughts during our life. Which is why we express them on internet to get validation from other users on internet or get corrected by them which is a good thing. Is this wrong? Not necessarily. See, we are already bound by social rules not to behave unreasonably, where else can we seek places to vent our frustration?
The internet.
His mistake was that he used his main profile to express the derogatory statement. He does not know how impactful the situation was until he decided to swiftly remove the comment
in order to reduce the tension built.
But the users WERE NOT even giving him a chance to remedy the situation. They took screenshot of it and posted everywhere. Their action of taking screenshot was worse than what he did to the late celebrity.
Let me emphasise, there were derogatory comments made by other users using their not-serious fake accounts and none of them were mentioned on news . Is his ignorance to seriousness of his comment proportioned to the treatment he received ? (his reputation is damaged, his career prospect too ,based on A REMOVED comment SCREENSHOTTED and FOCUSED by internet users)
Last but not least, has the victim's family made an official announcement of his distasteful comment? If not , it means that the matter was not worth to catch their attention. Remember that.
People should calm down. We did mistakes , we try to reduce the extent of the damage. This shouldn't be on news if those SJWs had not took a screenshot of the withdrawn comment and spread everywhere. Those SJWs are sharing the immoral things they did to him. Worse still they are too many to be marked down. Sad world really. Not everything deserve to be on hot news.
When does it count as 'swift'? A few days later after he came out with his so called 'first apology' or it should have been immediately he came out with the comment? Did you read all his comments? Not only his first statement about women should offer sex but the other statements after that? He wasn't even trying to remedy the situation, instead trying to stand behind his statement. The way you are explaining is like you weren't completely caught up with it. As one of the forummer has mentioned, it is common sense on what he should have commented. He is a doctor in making, how does he not use his common sense? If he is unable to think properly, you think he would be a proper doctor? Whose fault is it now that he is in this situation right now? The internet? The 'SJWs'?Let's be honest. We all harbour negative thoughts during our life. Which is why we express them on internet to get validation from other users on internet or get corrected by them which is a good thing. Is this wrong? Not necessarily. See, we are already bound by social rules not to behave unreasonably, where else can we seek places to vent our frustration?
The internet.
His mistake was that he used his main profile to express the derogatory statement. He does not know how impactful the situation was until he decided to swiftly remove the comment
in order to reduce the tension built.
But the users WERE NOT even giving him a chance to remedy the situation. They took screenshot of it and posted everywhere. Their action of taking screenshot was worse than what he did to the late celebrity.
Let me emphasise, there were derogatory comments made by other users using their not-serious fake accounts and none of them were mentioned on news . Is his ignorance to seriousness of his comment proportioned to the treatment he received ? (his reputation is damaged, his career prospect too ,based on A REMOVED comment SCREENSHOTTED and FOCUSED by internet users)
Last but not least, has the victim's family made an official announcement of his distasteful comment? If not , it means that the matter was not worth to catch their attention. Remember that.
People should calm down. We did mistakes , we try to reduce the extent of the damage. This shouldn't be on news if those SJWs had not took a screenshot of the withdrawn comment and spread everywhere. Those SJWs are sharing the immoral things they did to him. Worse still they are too many to be marked down. Sad world really. Not everything deserve to be on hot news.
Mar 20 2019, 10:51 AM

Quote
0.0114sec
0.35
7 queries
GZIP Disabled