english please?

its a blog btw, not a japanese magazine publisher and the author said that it's not really good samples.

have u seen results at iso 3200 for mkIII? blows every camera away

rumor?? i have not seen this magazine around at all in any shops? why aren`t there any magazine samples on the site?

quote from the 2nd site `あまり良いサンプルではありませんが参考にして下さい。`

i was refering to mkIII iso 3200 capabilities, not refering to the photo.

i think it`s a rumor to say that k10d is better than the mkIII by comparing 2 not good samples?

even the author did not make such conclusions

---

Added on June 20, 2007, 11:35 amand i quote from the 1st link

Japanese blogger Digital1gan.com has made two shots - one with Pentax K10D + DA 16-45mm F4, and one with Canon 1D mark3 + EF 24-70mm F2.8L. As clearly seen on the 100% cropped images above, 1.5x CCD sensor of Pentax K10D gives a way better details and overall resolution than Canon's 1.3x CMOS. While Canon's picture is more contrasty, grass and thin branches of the tree at the forefront are significantly blurred.

If you wish to compare this pictures by yourself, try to download 1Dmark3's .CR2 RAW and K10D's .PEF files.

This post has been edited by clemong_888: Jun 20 2007, 11:36 AM