1. i went to a construction site one day and shoot any flower i can see

2. flower from same site

3. then go home and shoot a flower bouquet, this time use the DIY ring flash

4. is this rose ? using the DIY ring flash too

xxx2299 learning photography, trying HDR in post #50
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 01:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
more flowers taken with FZ20.
1. i went to a construction site one day and shoot any flower i can see ![]() 2. flower from same site ![]() 3. then go home and shoot a flower bouquet, this time use the DIY ring flash ![]() 4. is this rose ? using the DIY ring flash too ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 01:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
went outstation on business trip, and end up shooting wild flowers by road side
this time using my first panasonic dc, the Lumix FX01. 1. for your eyes only... ![]() 2. ![]() |
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 01:20 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
my wife start to tak tahan me liao, because of crazy with shooting flowers.
This post has been edited by xxx2299: Nov 14 2007, 09:16 AM |
|
|
Nov 14 2007, 09:17 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
recently acquired a fujifilm f20 and tried out some flower shots, on a cloudy morning.
F20 iso100 F4 1/250 ![]() F20 iso100 F2.8 1/350 ![]() This post has been edited by xxx2299: Nov 14 2007, 09:19 AM |
|
|
Nov 14 2007, 09:42 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
it's best you take photo of flowers when there's sufficient lighting.
i also like flower shots and i think you could improve on your 1. choice of time 2. angles good effort nevertheless. composition quite ok already. if possible, try to maintain your pictures at 6x4 or 4x6 size (3x2 / 2x3 if you may). |
|
|
Nov 14 2007, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
The pictures are underexposed. Bump up the exposure compensation and they will look much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2007, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 14 2007, 09:42 AM) it's best you take photo of flowers when there's sufficient lighting. --1. choice of timei also like flower shots and i think you could improve on your 1. choice of time 2. angles good effort nevertheless. composition quite ok already. if possible, try to maintain your pictures at 6x4 or 4x6 size (3x2 / 2x3 if you may). noted on this --2. angles i do not quite understand on this. do you mean to shot facing the flower and not from the side? --if possible, try to maintain your pictures at 6x4 or 4x6 size is there any particular reason for this size? thanks for your comments, really noob in photography. QUOTE(CompMac @ Nov 14 2007, 10:23 AM) will take note on this. anyway, how to judge photo is underexpose?thanks you too. |
|
|
Nov 16 2007, 10:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(xxx2299 @ Nov 16 2007, 10:24 AM) --1. choice of time When the flowers tend to look dull and a bit dark, then it is underexposed. To go further technical, you can refer to the histogram. Do calibrate your monitor to get the best results. You can refer to my portfolio on my signature for flower pictures that I've taken.noted on this --2. angles i do not quite understand on this. do you mean to shot facing the flower and not from the side? --if possible, try to maintain your pictures at 6x4 or 4x6 size is there any particular reason for this size? thanks for your comments, really noob in photography. will take note on this. anyway, how to judge photo is underexpose? thanks you too. Do shoot more. The more you practise, the better you are. |
|
|
Nov 16 2007, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
The composition is actually not bad, just that it looks desaturated. Could it be the white balance setting in your camera? Check the camera setting.
|
|
|
Nov 16 2007, 07:47 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(xxx2299 @ Nov 16 2007, 10:24 AM) --2. angles i do not quite understand on this. do you mean to shot facing the flower and not from the side? ok more like angles that hide away the not so nice or distracting background. not that you're not doing it yet. QUOTE(xxx2299 @ Nov 16 2007, 10:24 AM) --if possible, try to maintain your pictures at 6x4 or 4x6 size yes well it's standard picture size, say 4Ris there any particular reason for this size? anyway try to maintain it with the ratio as follows. 3R (3" x 5") 4R (4" x 6") 5R (5" x 7") 6R (6" x 8") 8R (8" x 10") * the numbers are changeable. 3x5 is same as 5x3. i use 3:2 (which is same as 6:4). QUOTE(xxx2299 @ Nov 16 2007, 10:24 AM) will take note on this. anyway, how to judge photo is underexpose? when photos look dark. |
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 12:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
i wonder if the Marumi filter you are using is multi-coated? Uncoated Filters will cause flares... well, use your lens hood as much as possible to minimize flare....
|
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(CompMac @ Nov 16 2007, 10:36 AM) When the flowers tend to look dull and a bit dark, then it is underexposed. To go further technical, you can refer to the histogram. Do calibrate your monitor to get the best results. You can refer to my portfolio on my signature for flower pictures that I've taken. saw all your flower shoots, understand what you mean by underexposed. did you post-process your flowers shoots?Do shoot more. The more you practise, the better you are. QUOTE(kelvinyam @ Nov 16 2007, 11:17 AM) The composition is actually not bad, just that it looks desaturated. Could it be the white balance setting in your camera? Check the camera setting. because still noob, always set white balance to auto.QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 16 2007, 07:47 PM) ok more like angles that hide away the not so nice or distracting background. thanks, and noted on thisnot that you're not doing it yet. yes well it's standard picture size, say 4R anyway try to maintain it with the ratio as follows. 3R (3" x 5") 4R (4" x 6") 5R (5" x 7") 6R (6" x 8") 8R (8" x 10") * the numbers are changeable. 3x5 is same as 5x3. i use 3:2 (which is same as 6:4). when photos look dark. QUOTE(wlcling @ Nov 17 2007, 12:30 AM) i wonder if the Marumi filter you are using is multi-coated? Uncoated Filters will cause flares... well, use your lens hood as much as possible to minimize flare.... yah, i think it is the UV filter too. it always happen when i point straight to a light source. |
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 01:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 06:40 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2007, 08:51 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
if the pictures can come out nicely straight away, then waffor post process? I also don't post process my pictures.......ok well, my only PP is resize / sharpen.
|
|
|
Nov 24 2007, 09:56 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
was in kl on 22 nov 07 and since i was only 5 minutes from klcc . . .
yes, yet another klcc shooting . . . fujifilm f20 iso400, f2.9, 1/20s ![]() fujifilm f20 iso400, f2.8, 1/20s ![]() fujifilm f20 iso200, f5, 1/4s ![]() |
|
|
Nov 24 2007, 10:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
Nice angle on the first shot
|
|
|
Dec 7 2007, 10:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
thanks kelvinyam
few more outing photos, c&c please... 1. had a hard time taking this photo, how to improve it? I estimate focal length at widest angle (basically trying my luck only) ![]() This post has been edited by xxx2299: Dec 7 2007, 12:15 PM |
|
|
Dec 7 2007, 12:16 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
2. nothing special
![]() |
|
|
Dec 7 2007, 12:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
3.
![]() |
| Change to: | 0.0191sec
0.97
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:42 PM |