it has been about 2 years since i started this topic, i bought a service apartment under HDA in early 2019, expecting to be able to get the MOT exempted under "
Stamp Duty (Exemption) (No. 7) Order 2018" for the first time home buyer.
[https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Circular%20No%20001-2019.pdf]
few days after i signed my SPA, the surat akuan came out stating that service apartment will be excluded from this stamp duty exemption.
[https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Circular%20No%20033-2019.pdf]
before i proceed buying this property, i have asked & confirmed many times with lawyer side & people in this forum, even during the SPA signing lawyer tell me can get the exemption no problem...
i really pissed off when i first get to know the MOT cannot be exempted, as it cost like another rm20,000 out of nowhere
after i calmed myself and do some checkings, i cant/dont really blame them, as during the "
Stamp Duty (Remission) Order 2016", service apartment is not excluded from the remission in the surat akuan.
[https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Circular%20No%20037-2017.pdf]
next year i will be getting my key, soon then i have to do the transfer and pay my mot, but now i still feel quite unacceptable.
the definition of "residential property" is the same in
Stamp Duty (Remission) Order 2016 and
Stamp Duty (Exemption) (No. 7) Order 2018, “residential property” means a house, a condominium unit, an apartment or a flat purchased or obtained solely to be used as a dwelling house.
when the definition is the same in both orders, why the earlier one doesnt exclude service apartment, but the later one exclude service apartment? shouldnt the earlier one be like precedent for the later one?
why TNB allow service apartment under HDA changed to residential rate?
i thought HDA status only given to residential property? if a service apartment got the HDA status, it should be treated as residential property right?
why not the definition of "residential property" means property under residential title? straightforward and no misleading, since the surat akuan just exclude only all the non residential titled properties.
speaking of fairness, why the 10th or 20th time house buyer can get stamp duty exemption on service apartment under HOC? why they want bully the first time homebuyer who supporting the government policy?
all this while i have been searching on google, hoping that the surat akuan had been amended or hoping some expertise did raised up this issue.
i really think first time homebuyer buying service apartment should get stamp duty exemption under
Stamp Duty (Exemption) (No. 7) Order 2018.
anyone please advise what can i do? i personally think such case has high chance of winning if bring it to the court, but i dont think it worth the time and money.
appreciate if anyone can give me good advise, thank you very much!
you mean the property you bought is below RM300,000? I read again your initial post and I think the best way is to talk to your SPA lawyer again on this matter. The law applicable at the time you sign your SPA. if it's already being updated, then you still have chance to appeal for the exemption. but if not, then it will be pretty much impossible.
This year I got a client also face similar issue but with RPGT. Initially he needed to pay about Rm60K ++ for RPGT but after appealing due to the changes of RPGT rate, he ended up paying only about RM20K plus
my current situation is different from the first post, you may refer to the long written post above then you would understand.
that time i opened this thread just to confirm commercial titled property under HDA (service apartment) able to get stamp duty exemption, as the people here and lawyer side also said can get because it is for dwelling.
i bought and signed in early 2019, under Stamp Duty (Exemption) (No. 7) Order 2018, first time homebuyer can get stamp duty exemption for buying residential property of value from rm300,000 to rm1,000,000.
to claim this exemption, we have to submit statutory declaration, but the statutory declaration exclude service apartment from claiming it, as shown in the photo that i attached in the post above.