Dec 19 2018, 04:06 PM
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE(heinlein @ Dec 19 2018, 12:40 AM)
It's easy to talk kok when they are not the victim. Even the police officer i report act like nothing happen. I dun trusted media anymore. They are controlled by corporation.
QUOTE(TyroneS @ Dec 19 2018, 09:54 AM)
They did mention did nothing wrong @ cimb clicks
other all wrong did not mention too.
other all wrong did not mention too.
QUOTE(sanosizo @ Dec 19 2018, 09:55 AM)
if cimb not wrong then how come only cimb kena
is there other bank kena same attack?
is there other bank kena same attack?
QUOTE(okuribito @ Dec 19 2018, 12:10 PM)
With the benefit of the nasilemakTech rebuttal, they say the truncation to 8 chars is not an issue at all because ALL old passwords are 8chars long anyway.
IF that's true, yeah it's a non issue. But why need slice with substring(0, 8) ??
BUT I asked here and some people said that their old passwords were longer than 8 chars. In which case, logic says that CIMB must have the passwords stored As Is somewhere in their system
So which is it? Were old passwords pre 18Nov exactly 8 chars OR minimum 8 chars (ie longer also got) ??
PS: those who kena unauthorised transactions should flood nasilemak tech with proof / police reports etc (where's the batu api smiley
)
PPS: just saw the latest version of se7en's article ...
everything I talked about is there 
IF that's true, yeah it's a non issue. But why need slice with substring(0, 8) ??
BUT I asked here and some people said that their old passwords were longer than 8 chars. In which case, logic says that CIMB must have the passwords stored As Is somewhere in their system
So which is it? Were old passwords pre 18Nov exactly 8 chars OR minimum 8 chars (ie longer also got) ??
PS: those who kena unauthorised transactions should flood nasilemak tech with proof / police reports etc (where's the batu api smiley
)PPS: just saw the latest version of se7en's article ...
everything I talked about is there QUOTE(okuribito @ Dec 19 2018, 12:10 PM)
With the benefit of the nasilemakTech rebuttal, they say the truncation to 8 chars is not an issue at all because ALL old passwords are 8chars long anyway.
IF that's true, yeah it's a non issue. But why need slice with substring(0, 8) ??
BUT I asked here and some people said that their old passwords were longer than 8 chars. In which case, logic says that CIMB must have the passwords stored As Is somewhere in their system
So which is it? Were old passwords pre 18Nov exactly 8 chars OR minimum 8 chars (ie longer also got) ??
PS: those who kena unauthorised transactions should flood nasilemak tech with proof / police reports etc (where's the batu api smiley )
PPS: just saw the latest version of se7en's article ... everything I talked about is there
IF that's true, yeah it's a non issue. But why need slice with substring(0, 8) ??
BUT I asked here and some people said that their old passwords were longer than 8 chars. In which case, logic says that CIMB must have the passwords stored As Is somewhere in their system
So which is it? Were old passwords pre 18Nov exactly 8 chars OR minimum 8 chars (ie longer also got) ??
PS: those who kena unauthorised transactions should flood nasilemak tech with proof / police reports etc (where's the batu api smiley
)PPS: just saw the latest version of se7en's article ...
everything I talked about is there NLT has amended the two articles in question and added a note in the first paragraph for clarity.
https://nasilemaktech.com/cimb-did-nothing-...al-explanation/
https://nasilemaktech.com/debunking-mainstr...never-happened/
Quote
LOL I read your 2 articles 
0.0182sec
0.78
7 queries
GZIP Disabled