QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Dec 13 2018, 12:13 PM)
please have a look at the Changi Northern approach
vs Seletar Northeast approach before you comment.
seletar is literally off the coast from Pasir Gudang.
so your logic is, this is a malaysian turboprop operator, so lets give them the ILS over Pasir Gudang and stunt the growth because any highrise have to get CAAS approval?
pasir gudang development have to get CAAS approval?
if this isnt an issue, like how CAAS and MOTSG has always presented it - surely ILS over Ang Mo Kio isn't an issue then?
langsung x paham all this ILS approach restriction thing so i ask lor, coz rasa rasa nya Pasir Gudang won't have to build so many tall building untill will restrict ILS approach kan? Then again, you got the comparison of building heights around Seletar Airport?
QUOTE(yhtan @ Dec 13 2018, 12:25 PM)
1. Tekong Island is theirs, buffer around 8km is sufficient, we give in this but doesn't mean we will give in selatar airport
2. They wanna use this force Malaysia government bow down at Singkie request
In short Singkie can go dai, bottom of seletar airport has higher buffer for their own. IF cannot then ask them demolish the airport and build somewhere lah, since singkie so rich now
actually i find it quite funny that now problems are happening on land, sea and air. Crooked bridge to VEP, then Tuas vs Johor Port Authority and then this whole ILS thing. ada apa lagi?