I hope you don't mind me asking a question,which of these graphics accelerator is suppose to be the better one?
GMA 950 vs GMA3000, any1 else doing same thing...?
|
|
 Jun 11 2007, 07:29 PM
|
 
Senior Member
635 posts Joined: Feb 2006 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
 Jun 17 2007, 01:07 PM
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet 
|
QUOTE(Nemesis181188 @ Jun 11 2007, 08:29 PM) I hope you don't mind me asking a question,which of these graphics accelerator is suppose to be the better one? built in ar...? by theory should be GMA3XXX series...   but practically u have to test urself or search for comparison done by others... n some of them depend on other hardware as well...P/S: GA-945GZM-S2 already absolete... replaced by GA-945GCMX-S2... diff is can support FSB 1333 processor but FSB still frozen at 1066 unless OC... and the RAM can go up to 667MHz... QUOTE(shinjun @ Jun 10 2007, 10:04 PM) i bet worse nope... 7300GS is better... even 7100 also better than GMA... QUOTE(nakata101 @ Jun 10 2007, 10:13 PM) GAM950 cant play NFS:Carbon if i m not mistake. brother... GMA950 is not meant for gaming... it's for presentation and normal use... and it's cheaper...  QUOTE(kanethesun @ Jun 10 2007, 11:08 PM) friend dell inspiron with GMA 950 run NFS Most Wanted at even 800x600 is lag like hell do u think 6150 is really good...? 7100 is basically a moded 6200... and i'm not impressed wif it...  and he fedup and stop playing  think the current best onboard would be the A690 chipset from ATI? it offers X1250 right? or maybe on par with GeForce 6150 I guess   QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jun 11 2007, 12:23 AM) intel graphics have always lost to those onboard graphics by nvidia and ati. not price wise...  QUOTE(arjuna_mfna @ Jun 11 2007, 01:21 PM) 3100 aka G33 still DX9 3100 and above are all DX10 ready rite....? 3500 aka G35 -->dx10  QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jun 11 2007, 01:32 PM) No matter how sucky GMA is, Intel lead the biggest share of graphics processing unit market. Seconded by Nvidia. yeah... i mean how many gamers are there out there...? Budget graphics processor is important for business class computer as it does not burden the manufacturer in mass-producing business computers. In real benchmark, GMA are decent performer compared to VIA Unichrome II stuff, which still stuck at DirectX 8.1 or even Geforce 6100. Intel's GMA is for a different (which is the biggest share of computer market share), which is the business/corporate computing. Comparing it with a dedicated PCI-E/AGP GPU completely unsuitable for benchmark as it is using shared memory architecture and different bus system. which is y WCG is not as popular as FIFA... but from the video footage from WCG website it feels like wrestling... QUOTE(allvin @ Jun 11 2007, 03:35 PM) You joking, right? It's a no-no.. i rather go for X3000 (desktop) or X3100(laptop) for low-budget.  wise choice... QUOTE(nakata101 @ Jun 11 2007, 03:52 PM) I think u r giving a wrong information, for gaming on onboard vga, geforce 6100 is far far better than xpress200 and GMA950. i wouldn't go for tat... 6100 is so outdated(look at which nForce using tat graphic)... X1250 & GMA3*** r the best choice of budget gaming onboard graphics... This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Jun 17 2007, 01:28 PM |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 08:28 PM
|
Senior Member
3,761 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
You can't really compare Intel GMA series graphics adapter with those from Nvidia and ATi. The Intel VGA adapters was designed with low power consumption in mind. That is why it is integrated with most laptops in the market today. If you want to compare graphical raw power, no doubt Nvidia/ATi will pawn Intel. However, if you were to compare energy efficiency/low power consumption, Intel's GMA adapter pawns Nvidia/ATi.
 |
|
|
Jun 17 2007, 09:08 PM
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL 
|
If u want gaming for integrated u should go for Nvidia or AMD solutions not from Intel. Anyway for very budget gaming u should looking to upgrade to 7300GT DDR3(PCIe). Its quite cheap right now or 8500GT for DX10.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 10:31 AM
|
Junior Member
411 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Malaysia
|
Wht is the price range of budget gaming laptop to u?
How about Benq Core2Duo lappy fitted with x1600 hyper memory to 512MB 1GB 667Mhz Ram only RM3550+ sounds to u? Am going to get one next year after they hv updated the processor to santa rosa. |
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 11:12 AM
|
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Seremban...
|
QUOTE(kel_jink @ Jun 18 2007, 10:31 AM) Wht is the price range of budget gaming laptop to u? u mean s41?How about Benq Core2Duo lappy fitted with x1600 hyper memory to 512MB 1GB 667Mhz Ram only RM3550+ sounds to u? Am going to get one next year after they hv updated the processor to santa rosa. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 11:31 AM
|
|
Junior Member
411 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Malaysia
|
|
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 02:57 PM
|
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah 
|
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 17 2007, 01:07 PM) 3100 and above are all DX10 ready rite....? nop, 3100 not support dx10 plz refer this link vga part http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelme...=11&l3=542&l4=0 This post has been edited by arjuna_mfna: Jun 20 2007, 08:15 AM |
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 04:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
QUOTE(kel_jink @ Jun 18 2007, 10:31 AM) Wht is the price range of budget gaming laptop to u? Gaming lappy sucks. Just wait until ASUS or MSI produce xternal VGA device and then plug an 8800Ultra on ur sub RM2000 lappy. How about Benq Core2Duo lappy fitted with x1600 hyper memory to 512MB 1GB 667Mhz Ram only RM3550+ sounds to u? Am going to get one next year after they hv updated the processor to santa rosa. This post has been edited by §layerXT: Jun 18 2007, 04:12 PM |
|
|
Jun 18 2007, 08:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
guys... i'm juz using 3Dmark & game as performance reference la... i didn't say it's for gaming although they are great alternative... and please consider price leh...
 |
|
|
Jun 19 2007, 07:39 PM
|
|
Junior Member
411 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Malaysia
|
Would u mind xplain y is dat so?
Added on June 19, 2007, 7:44 pm QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jun 18 2007, 04:11 PM) Gaming lappy sucks. Just wait until ASUS or MSI produce xternal VGA device and then plug an 8800Ultra on ur sub RM2000 lappy. sorry..forgot to quote earlierThis post has been edited by kel_jink: Jun 19 2007, 07:44 PM |
|
|
Jun 19 2007, 08:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
Gaming on lappy cost u very expensive, usually above RM5000. Furthermore if u want high end GPU on laptop maybe cost nearly RM10k. Lappy below RM5k usually equipped with lower midrange card such as X1600PRO or 7400GS(which both perform slower than 6600GT) which degrade gaming experience.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 08:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah
|
why do u need buy expensive notebook and play games on it... let see the budget rm5000 for gaming notebook, spend rm3000 form pc lo, can get good spec with rm3000 gaming pc, then spend other rm2000 for normal notebook, that the way i always do, buy budget notebook just for normal work, and good rig for gaming... buy rm5000 notebook is useless to me...
This post has been edited by arjuna_mfna: Jun 20 2007, 11:59 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 11:14 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
But if ur casual gamer its fine though.
 |
|
|
Jun 21 2007, 02:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(kel_jink @ Jun 19 2007, 08:39 PM) Would u mind xplain y is dat so? how much would u spend on a gaming rig...? n how much would an average gamer if rough income of RM1.5K would spend...?Added on June 19, 2007, 7:44 pm sorry..forgot to quote earlier i'm juz testing the cheap alternative... |
| Change to: |  0.0197sec
 0.51
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 06:50 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.