If you sell what you preach, then no problem. It is not wrong for a person/company to maximise profits, this is perfectly legal and encouraged (economic boost, job opportunities, etc.). What is totally wrong is engaging in marketing fraud.

When you promote properties or units that you have purchased yourself, this is called conflict of interest. 

When you give false promises/claims regarding the nature or quality of a product, this is called misrepresentation.

MCT Cybersouth is a perfect example: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2196202403735945/

If the guy can afford to En-bloc purchase a project, and promote it back for resell then what is wrong with that right? That is the risk they took in case they are unable to re-sell it back. Of course when one took the advice to buy or not to buy during talks/seminar then that is their own decision.

Similarly when we go to property launch developer or agents also promote their project sky-high. So it is no different just the approach is different   

Btw is there any other project(s) that the guy book/purchase en-bloc before ? If there is, how was the appreciation like in term of investment and rental?

Isn’t it better that the person selling the project, buy the project himself together with his purchasers?

Its his job to find good project. If he finds one and he didn’t buy, then you would say “he don’t even buy the project he said is good”.

And aspartame, you don’t understand the grading system right? Oklah, share with us how you identify good and bad project.

If wanna rich, achieve financial freedom... Buy Solasta..

It will help you easily achieve financial freedom. Buy many units as you can. Solasta is really a gem..

Fair enough if this is the first time for the venture. How about past recommended project any that totally flop with no recovery?   

Hahaha.. Who is this MC? If wanna compare with FR.. FR is like China and MC is like Taiwan..

Okay.. he got some followers.. but just be careful, so many fake so called property master in Malaysia nowadays..

FR got many haters and a lot of people jelous with him, O don't surprise if someone say irrelevant thing about FR method of analysing property, it's normal practice from haters...

Looks like this thread has been about property gurus and Solasta…

Almost everyone that invest in properties has a mentor. It can be a free source like family member, friends, etc…. or paid source like property gurus. Hence I am ok with having property gurus around as it can be difficult to find a good mentor. 

There is no property investment methodology that is applicable to everything. This is because there is no set and fast rules to investment due to the variety of property classes and investment objectives. Some investors go for rental, some for capital appreciation and some will say both (in reality for those who says both - in the back of their mind they know which objective outweighs the other). Hence there will always be a debate on which methodology is better than the other. Property gurus/mentors are the same and when it comes to selecting one, always go with one that shares the same investing philosophy as you. Example: FR is value investing and rental focus while MC is risk avoidance and capital focus….at least that’s the way I see their approaches.

As for credibility of property gurus/mentors, always ask yourself if their comments make sense or show experience. Example: Posting a question on tiles popping up when you run an ID firm doesn’t hold well. Also be wary of data on how they are drawn and displayed. Example: The survey result of consumer buying preference will vary depending on the survey method, survey group demograph and sample size….you can sniff out the BS gurus from there.
I don’t know Solasta well enough to give a verdict but I guess it depends if you are analysing it from a Dutamas, Segambut or both lens. From a Dutamas lens, the psf and absolute value is cheap and I believe the developer has discounted the price due to the highway, HTC and cemetery. From Segambut lens, it is expensive and mixed from the both lens. Hence I get all the debates…..what has gotten me curious is the lifestyle aspect from top of the class facility in the analysis of this property and how is it weighted by FR group. Honestly it is a progressive approach to property investing which I think is good and forward thinking. Anyone can shed more light into this?

P.S - Having cross path with both FR and MC, I can say both have done well in their property investment journey and can retire comfortability with their existing portfolio. I know FR is very genuine in his intend and really passionate about property. We all know the saying “follow your passion and the money will come”….well hopefully. Disclaimer – I have not joined or engaged any FAR Capital services hence the question above. 

let me give a spoiler since all 57 pages at LYN has zero information either from YNH or FR ...
3 out 4

Sifu's please give your comments to newbies like us 
@deadravel, @beancounter, @askerperang, @kochin, @manutdgiggs, @bjorn1688, @david_77