Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
KINGSTON SSD A400 240gb Budget SSD, ssd
|
xxboxx
|
 Dec 7 2018, 12:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(khiunngiap @ Dec 5 2018, 07:49 PM) Hi , I have been using 960 250g for a year, it pairs with ryzen 1700 . Still running strong even today( 10 sec enters ) os. Have been thinking about upgrade to 500gb . Would I have the same user experience if I get western digital 3d nand Black ? As it is a lot of cheaper than 970 WDS500G2X0C? According to here it should be faster than 960 Evo 250GB https://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/WD-Bl...485459vsm200373https://www.pcworld.com/article/3265032/sto...ssd-review.htmlIf it's the older version (WDS512G1X0C) then worse performance. https://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/WD-Bl...251339vsm200373 |
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Dec 19 2018, 01:21 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(tslim2696 @ Dec 19 2018, 12:14 PM) hmm that's strange. every game I play the SSD like to freeze...I am using 480G version....Played JC4 and XCOM2 also freeze...music goes into loop..wait till SSD load data back then can resume. Both SSD also like that. I am starting to think that the SSD's are refurbished. Lol Is the SSD almost full? |
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Dec 25 2018, 11:03 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Savor_Savvy @ Dec 24 2018, 08:16 AM) How about the cheap Kingston a1000? Same issue? QUOTE(TristanX @ Dec 24 2018, 08:20 AM) Although Kingston A1000 performance is one of the worse for NVME SSD, my opinion it's still better than SATA SSD. Even when against Barracuda SATA SSD.     https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Seagate...D_500_GB/4.htmlNVME always the better choice against SATA because of the bigger bandwidth and better latency. Unless of course if the drive is really bad until SATA SSD can outperform it. |
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Dec 25 2018, 04:18 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TristanX @ Dec 25 2018, 01:14 PM) When you have Intel 760p for RM80 more money which is miles better, A1000 can be ignored.  https://www.anandtech.com/show/12991/the-ki...me-ssd-review/2Cheapest I saw A1000 is RM202. So that makes 760P is expensive by almost 50%. Does the higher price justify the performance? Anandtech test is more like stress test of the drive. Techpowerup also do normal user usage test. https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Intel/S...p_512_GB/8.htmlWin 10 startup time 760P 17.7 seconds A1000 19.2 seconds Winrar compression time 760P 35.5 seconds A1000 42.5 seconds MP3 indexing time 760P 1.7 seconds A1000 2.3 seconds Avast anti virus scan time 760P 51.2 seconds A1000 62.6 seconds Photoshop editing time 760P 61.5 seconds A1000 54.3 seconds |
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Jan 3 2019, 11:14 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Rubypoyo @ Jan 2 2019, 12:06 PM) A400 user here, happy with its performance for my 2008 intel duo core pc....  I dont know why with the bashing of cheap ssd....is already a steal when ur conside its cheap price plus 3 years warranty on the ssd and its not like ur can spot different in ssd performance anyway QUOTE(netmatrix @ Jan 2 2019, 01:08 PM) If you run it though benchmark, yes there are difference. But for general use without attaching numbers, it is really much much better than HDD. But for the thousands of buyers of A400 would they care if it was fast? The ones that made noise are the cheapskates gamers that bought it without studying the pros and cons.  Are there's stuttering issue as what some are complaining? |
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Sep 9 2020, 04:15 PM
|
|
|
Really salute your withholding power.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0226sec
0.43
6 queries
GZIP Disabled