Everyone has their got own different taste and needs when choosing a place to stay. just becoz someone doesn't want to touch it doesn't mean it's bad.am staying in Oug Parklane for 4 years.not perfect,not much defects at my unit but suit for my budget and so far only complain is the visitors parking other than that, i have everything that i need from food,house amenities and clinics without me driving out. And if its really that bad, then someone should explain how come the occupancy rate here is almost 90%?But its really up you to choose.

No point ..some ppl just wont listen. They would like to hear the opposite because they are attracted to the location and offers. Look at 288 and parklane. 288 was marketed at luxury semi d in the sky.. sold at high cost rate at that time. The finished product was like parklane... lol. See already also can laugh. A luxury condo that does not have a lobby. Tile used were the same since kuchai avenue.

Good at marketing, but speaking as a current owner of OUG Parklane, I strongly don't recommend this developer to anyone.

I think a lot of ppl who knows about Akisama is a developer with bad finishing. The thing they are just building affordable properties in KL. Is there any property around their project site cost below RM500psf? Comparing it with PR1MA, Selangorku, etc that you cannot sell or rent before 10 years which you are bonded to that property.

Sometimes ppl's expectations are too high about a developer. I just think we need to evaluate a developer. I personally think some lifestyle developments are great but are you paying for the facilities and landscaping or are you paying for the property you are staying in.