Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 How's the Akisama Group project?, Good or bad? can trust?

views
     
Bjorn1688
post Feb 28 2019, 11:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
It's very simple.

You did not get what you did not pay for.

In reality OUG Parklane isn't all that different from M Vertica and again it is the same stuff you don't get what you did not pay for.

In both these cases you get a good location which in itself cost money, the developer has to cut some corners elsewhere.

Personally I see it that they should be credited for delivering a home at that price at that location. Not that easy to pull off.

This post has been edited by Bjorn1688: Feb 28 2019, 11:41 PM
Bjorn1688
post Mar 1 2019, 01:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,924 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
QUOTE(Harry_Bobinski @ Mar 1 2019, 10:34 AM)
Actually I agree with woolei. Most who have been complaining about Parklane are the ones who are not staying in there and renting their units out. Those who are staying in there only complains about the traffic in the morning when driving into Jalan Puchong - Klang Lama. I have a few friends who are currently staying there happily.

That's just my opinion. I don't stay in Parklane.
*
Most people I know who bought at OUG Parklane are more than happy with the place as it met their expectation. Minor defects most expected it as they knew they were buying a box in the sky at a location where if the quality was any better it would be closer to RM500-600k, most also bought it with cashback and rebates, they are mostly a happy bunch as it made the difference between owning their own home for around RM1400 per month vs continuing to pay rent.

The ones who complain the most? Investors especially flippers and to a certain extent landlords, to whom I only have one thing to say, you only have yourself to blame.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0151sec    0.43    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 10:30 AM