Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Myvi accident, speeding

views
     
nerd
post Jun 4 2007, 08:31 PM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



QUOTE(gkl83 @ Jun 4 2007, 08:18 PM)
both of the car dont have ABS loh...

and never to drive fast with a stock car...
*
so modified car can drive fast? shakehead.gif

Black MyVi's driver's really unlucky to be there, but also lucky to escape with her life. sweat.gif

Wonder what sort of speed was he driving, until the car can actually fly and somersault.. gosh..
nerd
post Jun 10 2007, 04:24 PM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



bashing attempt thwarted! laugh.gif

allow me.

the front of cars are usually made softer than the rest of the car. based on the physics formula:

F=(mv-mu)/t

the longer the impact time, the less the momentum acting on the object. so, by making crumple zones, the time of impact will be lengthened, and since F is inverse proportional to t, the overall force acting on the car will be reduced.

tongue.gif

This post has been edited by nerd: Jun 10 2007, 04:25 PM
nerd
post Jun 11 2007, 10:26 AM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



correction: older volvos are made like a brick.

last time there were no research done on crumple zones, so the carmakers decided to make the cars as stiff as possible. while this made the car 'safer' so to speak, but the driver will suffer more in an accident, as the impact is not dissipated efficiently.

so, you want your car to be saved or yourself to be saved? rolleyes.gif
nerd
post Jun 11 2007, 11:37 AM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



QUOTE(Dannyl @ Jun 11 2007, 10:35 AM)
You mean last time Volvo has been touted as one of the safest cars around, they're actually the worst?!
*
definitely not doh.gif

last time there were NO crumple zones, and cars were built like cans, while Volvos were more stiff and rigid. doh.gif at least the damage on both the car and driver is minimised, although the driver suffers more as compared to an accident to cars with crumple zones.

doesn't that make Volvo one of the safest? doh.gif

This post has been edited by nerd: Jun 11 2007, 11:38 AM
nerd
post Jun 11 2007, 11:48 AM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



both are safe if driven properly instead of recklessly wink.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0271sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:39 PM