Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Parallels and Performance

views
     
TSnouras
post Jun 4 2007, 07:53 AM, updated 19y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


Just out of curiosity, how much of a performance hit is it running windows on parallels compared to windows on bootcamp? Parallels is an emulator after all..

Thanks in advance for your feedback

wiraone
post Jun 4 2007, 10:48 AM

Who cares about all the stars?
*******
Senior Member
3,892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Back on earth!
Parallels is not emulator .. instead, it creates virtual machine .. slicing the CPU usage instead of emulating the CPU instructions.

I've been running Parallels since day one I have my MBP, well, office reason .. need to access office through VPN. I have no biggy problem with performance .. but then again, I only run office applications on Parallels.
tishaban
post Jun 4 2007, 11:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,615 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
Aside from games and apps that stress the Direct3D portion of Windows, there's very little noticeable performance loss when running Parallels. Wiarone explained it succintly. Make sure you have enough memory though, 1GB is the minimum IMO (512MB for Parallels and the rest for OSX).

Timber
post Jun 4 2007, 12:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Seremban, N.S.


I have a friend running Parrallels on his MacBook and it runs like a tortoise with 512MB RAM. Once he maxed out his RAM to 2Gig he able to boot WinXP via Parrallels within 20 secs. I was mightly impressed.
d@odao
post Jun 4 2007, 12:45 PM

Daodao
*******
Senior Member
2,648 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sri Petaling, Seri Kembangan...
will it be fine if run parallels with 1.25MB ram on a macbook ?
Onso
post Jun 4 2007, 01:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


MOAR RAM = MOAR EFFIECIENT use of processing powa.
groucho
post Jun 4 2007, 03:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: May 2007


QUOTE(d@odao @ Jun 4 2007, 12:45 PM)
will it be fine if run parallels with 1.25MB ram on a macbook ?
*
yup.. that's what i have and it's fine... even on vista using aero smile.gif
TSnouras
post Jun 4 2007, 04:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. I don't game on my laptop so i guess i'm gonna hop on to parallels instead of having to reboot each time to run SPSS (some statistics program). Plus i'll be able to send offline messages easily if i have to via windows version of msn.
d@odao
post Jun 4 2007, 05:10 PM

Daodao
*******
Senior Member
2,648 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sri Petaling, Seri Kembangan...
QUOTE(groucho @ Jun 4 2007, 03:08 PM)
yup.. that's what i have and it's fine... even on vista using aero smile.gif
*
does the temperture gets hot like 60+ ?...
allvin
post Jun 4 2007, 06:22 PM

......
*******
Senior Member
4,506 posts

Joined: Aug 2005

QUOTE(groucho @ Jun 4 2007, 04:08 PM)
yup.. that's what i have and it's fine... even on vista using aero smile.gif
*
Dude, u sure u using parallels and enable aero? blink.gif The current parallels don't support 3D accerelation. So no-no for aero.. nod.gif
baby26
post Jun 4 2007, 07:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


I run parallels with 2G on XP and it is smooth. Yes the temp is 60+ and during burning goes to 80 which I think is serious issue with the MB.
chrono_breaks
post Jun 5 2007, 07:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
182 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Shah Alam
Hi,

I'm new user of iMac 21". May I get an advice, ok for me to buy parallel now or wait for Leopord first. And may I know the price for Parallel. Thank.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0201sec    0.52    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 03:50 AM