yup, both Anwar and Madey

there is more proof about 1MDB than terowong Penang, so you don't get to say that

remember it's your own Jabatan Audit Negara and your own Bijan signing off your own report, which was hushed up so that Bijan can continue lying to the rakyat that 1MDB is perfectly fine:



tak habis2 where's the proof, dono if actually blind or retarded

tldr, any summary?

1MDB no proof?? Dah lah... this 1 is concrete as stone.... US Department of Justice already seized USD 1bil of assets since 2 years ago still not one single person dare to claim it back until now... LOL

Nah.. all the money trail clearly described in the two complaint..

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/page/f...877166/download

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/f...973671/download

All the proof (at least the part of money trail in the US) hold by US DoJ

plus IRB.

Seize all of its assets and drive the crony company to the ground!

Only if u have the money. The reason that MNC consultants can set up their branch here to train the locals for this kind of projects because they can bring in a lot expats from Singapore/Hong Kong, and all are 5 figures a month at least.

Local consultants sinply dun have the money and resources.

I support Tony Pua, he's right.

PH government has 2 choices....accept 12% discount from Gamuda or from independent audit possibly 25% can be reduced. As money is tight...any reasonable government would seek better cost n open tender for final part. Project still ongoing...the final phased. If nobody can beat the price of Gamuda then you will still get the job. Why hoo ha hoo ha....

You can be the cheapest, but theres going to be VO which will burst the savings... Not to mention, abortive fee, etc for the work done...

Actually Gamuda ald refuted thier report, even MRTC did.

is not a requirement in the contract but funds is from gov.. so when recipient is being asked to furnish the breakdown, the practical thing is to give those info... unless got something major to hide.

it never goes well when you;re against the gov of the day.

I don't know about the details of this project. But there are companies out there who earn big dollars by helping to save on big projects. A certain exhibition center in Msia cost X millions, design by years of experienced engineers. Yet, a small consultant firm managed to show savings in many places. Luckily the owner decided to go against his initial group of engineers' advice and proceeded with the plans from this small firm. Til today, this exhibition center is still standing, no structural problems.

This small firm later on progress with more local and overseas projects, all with the same game plan. I help you save, and I earn from a portion from the savings. From flats, condos, hostels, housing projects, shopping malls, and recently converting sea water into drinkable water in overseas... a good brain is a good brain. Doesn't necessarily need to have that much of experience in order to see the problem and solve the problem. And this is a Malaysian company. There is always more than one way to solve any math problems.

This extra 2 or 3 billion savings can pay debt or increase a bit civil servants pay...why heboh heboh??

Gamuda say diskaun Rm2 billion aje

MOF say diskaun Rm5 billion boleh (according to Tony Pua)

Gamuda say fuckoff tak boleh

MOF say fuckoff, terminate contract

Gamuda dan staffnya semua menangis kepada social media kata 20,000 jobs terbang etc etc

Tony kata jangan bullshit banyak

/k semua argue kerana setakat ni hanya boleh ikut cakap Gamuda engineer vs MOF engineer

troopers BN bergegas salahkan LGE

there, 30 pages in 1 post

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Oct 10 2018, 03:08 PM

cos Gamuda LCLY playing hard ball!

Just unleash MACC plus IRB on Gamuda.. see who received kickbacks. end of story.
Seize all of its assets and drive the crony company to the ground!

If the contract award to them, maybe they will have that kind of budget to hire. I am not in construction, not sure how complex resources hiring is. But in IT, all this are standard e.g no 1 will know everything.

Putting minconsult/Tony number aside, Gamuda should provide their own breakdown if they are sincere to retain the business or work with the government.

I wouldn't want to release minconsult number if i am Tony, and i am not obligated to (at least this stage). Purchaser do not need to provide the cost justification from Vendor B in order for Vendor A to reduce their price.

They hired independent engineer consultants

nice summary

mana whinning first class element, tu yang penting bang

please explain how retender will cost more money? as long as project sponsor which is govt able to accept for due diligence, why not?

The report ofcourse is not in public.

Gamuda ald clarified that in their media statement.