QUOTE(lurkingaround @ Nov 2 2024, 04:58 PM)
.
If U Mobile's DNB2 launches as 5G SA with a low-band frequency of 600MHz (eg 2X20MHz = 800Mbps bandwidth capacity) = the 5G cell tower has a long range of >2km, DNB2 can achieve 80% coverage in about 1 year.
....... By not over-selling initially, eg limit 100 subscribers per 5G cell tower, each active subscriber can get 8Mbps during peak traffic hours in urban areas. More subscribers (up to 500 per cell tower) can later be added as more 5G cell towers are built/deployed together with the shorter range mid-band frequency of 3500MHz.
In comparison, DNB1 launched as 5G NSA with the mid-band frequency of 3500MHz (1X200MHz) = it's 5G cell towers have a short range of <1km = more cell towers needed to be built/deployed to cover a certain area. Hence, it took DNB1 about 2 years to achieve 80% coverage.
....... On top of that, 5G NSA's mid-band frequency of 3500MHz has poor indoor signal and is recently also subjected to network congestion during peak traffic hours in urban areas as more 5G subscribers are added.
.
DNB 5G now is 100mhz x 2 but only get 1Gbps, how low band 2x20mhz can get to 800mbps?If U Mobile's DNB2 launches as 5G SA with a low-band frequency of 600MHz (eg 2X20MHz = 800Mbps bandwidth capacity) = the 5G cell tower has a long range of >2km, DNB2 can achieve 80% coverage in about 1 year.
....... By not over-selling initially, eg limit 100 subscribers per 5G cell tower, each active subscriber can get 8Mbps during peak traffic hours in urban areas. More subscribers (up to 500 per cell tower) can later be added as more 5G cell towers are built/deployed together with the shorter range mid-band frequency of 3500MHz.
In comparison, DNB1 launched as 5G NSA with the mid-band frequency of 3500MHz (1X200MHz) = it's 5G cell towers have a short range of <1km = more cell towers needed to be built/deployed to cover a certain area. Hence, it took DNB1 about 2 years to achieve 80% coverage.
....... On top of that, 5G NSA's mid-band frequency of 3500MHz has poor indoor signal and is recently also subjected to network congestion during peak traffic hours in urban areas as more 5G subscribers are added.
.
QUOTE(poh880 @ Nov 4 2024, 10:59 AM)
Frankly speaking, all this because telco don't limit the 5G speed. All go for best effort. Even 10Gbps bandwidth will get used up on high demand towers.
That is the reason quota plan is exist since day 1. unlimited quota should not exist but some "telco" spoiled the market at 4G, and cannot fallback when 5G comes. QUOTE(YoungMan @ Nov 4 2024, 04:54 PM)
MCMC could have taken the approach of awarding this project to 2 telcos, balancing DNB and 2nd 5G.
If they do so just like how Celcomdigi limit their 5G to 100mbps, 5G is even slower then existing 4G. But I guest the reason of limiting 5G speed is to prevent over usage of quota which need to be pay to DNB.
limit speed is something like our old fiber time, everyone 10mbps and congest TM backbone, release all bandwidth as huge as possible let the traffic complete earlier is way better than limit the speed, things can be transferred within second but u limit it, the traffic will occupy the bandwidth and next usage is limited alsoIf they do so just like how Celcomdigi limit their 5G to 100mbps, 5G is even slower then existing 4G. But I guest the reason of limiting 5G speed is to prevent over usage of quota which need to be pay to DNB.
Nov 4 2024, 05:32 PM

Quote

0.0257sec
0.50
7 queries
GZIP Disabled