Yup I faced the block today as well, went to ask because VP supposed to be later this month, the staff all very evasive, giving evasive answers to a simple & direct question of whether we can get access during VP or need to drive around old town to get there...

Lol, received this right after finish posting, at 530pm long after today's event over:

RM0.00 (SEH)Due to sudden excavation works by others at the Swan roundabout, pls use Jln Semenyih to reach South Creek @ SEH2. Apologies for the inconvenience.

This post has been edited by fztt: Aug 19 2018, 06:00 PM

Personally I won't consider bringing issue to politicians unless I know the real reason for what's happening.

Because IF SP is at fault (we won't know unless they stop being evasive), I consider it a misrepresentation of facts when they sold the units hyping the masterplan & access roads. This is not a highway dependent on highway authorities' approval, this is between 2 developers & they had years to sort it out.

SP should be more upfront about the real issues instead of being evasive when asked by purchasers, which raised suspicions as to who is actually at fault, I was quite pissed at the silly grins & conversation going round&round without addressing directly why & when. They seem to be afraid of future sales being affected but not afraid of anger of current purchasers about to VP.

Very disappointing.

Based on the document you linked, court ruled in favor of SP in Jan 2018, that was many months ago... seems like EM is still ignoring court order, or is there a newer case ongoing...

Dismissed with cost & land oredi surrendered, ie, govt land, still want to appeal

Thanks for your hard work clarifying and acting on behalf of purchasers, Devan, I appreciate it bro

Having said that... now they said they have done their part, after the issues get highlighted here and someone produced the court document.

When I asked prior to this, they gave me vague answers and the runaround from rep to rep in their showroom.

The SMS that came on Sunday implied it was an unexpected "sudden excavation work" that leads to temporary closure, a completely misleading message when read together with the court document posted here.

In fact, on Sunday's event, they put up directional buntings all the way along the old road and none in the direction through EM, which can only mean it was definitely prepared in advance and not in response to "sudden excavation work".


So if any of SP's rep reading this: I suggest SP "help us to help you" by drafting a FB infographics highlighting the LEGAL & other FACTS so that buyers can viral it, it's better than us ranting online individually WITHOUT the full facts since you are not being upfront about it. Take responsibility. If you have nothing to hide, this is the right way to engage your buyers & supporters to win the war through social media.

This post has been edited by fztt: Aug 21 2018, 08:56 AM

Yup can see from main road but cannot drive in...

Yup, I queued up when they first launched to get a unit.

I hope SP is taking responsibility and realize buyers can claim misrepresentation since this issue happen before VP. It's different if we have already VP'ed, moved in and suddenly EM block the road, if that were to happen, then SP can say they help us and we also need to help highlight, but not in this scenario.

Maybe they realize it and that's why all the evasive, pusing-pusing replies given prior to this.

As buyers, we can highlight our unhappiness publicly to help draw attention to it, however, it falls on SP to deliver on what they sold, including the access road which was heavily promoted in their masterplan.

They want us to do "our part", then they need to furnish the data and the tools so that we can help THEM.

I would agree with you if this is not the very first phase and if we have already VP'ed & moved in & EM came in & block the access... in this case the road was never opened so we do not know the facts & SP is not very open about it...

... and my point exactly regarding social media power, without knowing head or tail, I will not take SP's suggestion to highlight the issue to anyone... based on what? Give us something concrete to work on...otherwise, purchasers (not residents yet) are the pingpong ball while the 2 developers are the pingpong players.

This post has been edited by fztt: Aug 21 2018, 06:24 PM

Respectfully, I do understand your point of view and I believe we are looking at this from very different angles, cheers.

VP letter received...

huh? If u mean physically check, u can't do that until VP day, otherwise, all relevant receipts been posted to me in good order b4 the vp letter came...