Nowadays people focus on down stream over upstream. Unless you working in advertising media and fashion line, highly rely on upload. Theoretically to say, 100 mbps per household is more than enough.
I bet the deployment for FTTH, eyes on Central, not countryside. This is why they are confident for the turbo upgrade.

Actually if you were to compare to England, our internet speed and infrastructure is improving. Their end each household getting inconsistent dl and ul , subject to peak hours and promised on certain speed range. The only telco that offered fully fibre optic services is HyperOptic in London. Rest of the place is prove to a nightmare.

As far as I know from a friend who work in Singapore as network engineering. He told me their PON network output to per building is 26gbps per ISP.
- Singtel owned their personal infrastructure
- Starhub and MyRepublic sharing fibre infrastructure
- M1 owned their personal infrastructure

- Assume if there are 50 units in a building, equivalent to said everybody get 500 mbps for 1Gbps signed up. I haven't take into account for those who signed up 10 Gbps and 2 Gbps yet. Can you imagine, how the speed looks like, if everyone using wired connection

Now we can tell, whatever Telco advertised speed is not what we getting. We being con by them for ages  , under the sales agreement. There are no guarantee speed set for peak hours. Anyone have insider information, on how they set the QOS