Good luck with your endeavour..........

Yes. The BTU is operating in 'Bridge' mode.
Really 100Mbps LAN link speed?


You don't have laptop with gigabit LAN port?
If the cable (Your new CAT5e cable) is connected from RGX4400 WAN* port to PC Lan port, does it link at 1Gbps? (Just to check if the cable has problem......subpar cable tends......you know)

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Sep 13 2018, 10:56 PM

Test faster.

If the link speed between RGX4400 WAN port with your PC using CAT5e is 1Gbps, it means BTU is the culprit and you have no choice but to contact TM..

-.- BTU problem it is.........Go make a complaint to TM, seem like your BTU port is configured at FE 100Mbps instead of 1Gbps.

For your second question, not really.
In theory, with 5Ghz 802.11AC 80Mhz channel width bottlenecked by 100Mbps FE port, you should get around 90Mbps down+upload for your 500Mbps turbo package.


For a proper speedtest between your RGX4400 and your j7 pro smartphone, I would propose using Iperf, but you are not a technical person.

That why I said your luck sucks. I personally think your RGX4400 wifi antenna is loose (not properly soldered or patch antenna has defect) or wifi chip has issue too.

Since you has 2 phones with 802.11ac and still get that weak signal at 3 meters, so the probability of faulty two phones is unlikely

As cpt7 mentioned, your I240G is "T" or "P" variant?

EDIT: Take a look on the sticker under the BTU/ONU.

NAT Boost / NAT Acceleration / Cut Through Forwarding / Fast Track will be disabled if QOS is enabled.

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Sep 13 2018, 11:22 PM

Well, guess the variant doesn't matter....

My condolences....

72Mbps? This is 802.11N speed at 20Mhz channel width, SGI 400ns and 64-QAM 5/6. I thought you are connecting using 802.11AC?

27Mbps is about right with that link speed given your neighbourhood busy 2.4Ghz hotspots.

Yes.

I noticed the guy is stingy as hell........ ....there are probably high end router aside from 878 when he visited the shop, but once he saw the price, he got ......

Advanced as in what?

The hardware specification is more or less same with Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent ONU.

Different casing only?
What seem to be advanced about it?

Technically it could work.....however....read below..

Based on the OLT manual, TM can remotely configure the BTU port to 1Gbps. Problem is.......whether the LiveChat agent know how to set it or not.......is another story.

I can't believe Fruitie is asking this type of question.


Huawei WS880 has 3x3:3 configuration. For 802.11AC, it means 1300Mbps. Factor in protocol overhead etc 1300 x 0.6 = 780Mbps.

Now, here the problem, does your devices have 3x3:3 configuration too?

AX even worst, behind a wooden wall = straight away no signal or very weak signal

LG V30+ and Lenovo X1 Carbon = 866Mbps with a 2 x 2 MU-MIMO ----> Best you can get is around 400Mbps and lower.

Now then...time to test via PC LAN first.....

Then 5ghz 802.11AC 80mhz channel width on your phone.



Oh ya, use the speedtest apps on your android phone, change the server, type in "Kuala Lumpur" and press "Telekom Malaysia"
If you use web browser on your phone....the webkit or webview component is bottlenecked by your phone weak CPU.

Correct.

Technically any low end device with 802.11AC 1x1:1 configuration can have link speed (PHY) of 433Mbps at 5ghz band 80Mhz channel width. Effective speed (MAC) would be 260Mbps........this is best case scenario with good signal reception.

So...downgrade to 300Mbps instead?

Opps, uncle read too fast.


Dude....PC LAN result first....if PC LAN result is turbo-ed, you can buy new router immediately to solve your wifi problem.

Your RGX4400 probably faulty. Impossible for 3 meter distance using 5ghz signal is -70dbm.