Women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they’ve made love with

https://mindfoster.co/1129/women-retain-and...made-love-with/

Women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have sexual intercourse, according to a new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

The study, which discovered the startling information by accident, was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases that occur more frequently in males.

But as the scientists picked apart the female brain, the study began to veer wildly off course. As it turns out, the female brain is even more mysterious than we previously thought.

The study found that female brains often harbor “male microchimerism“, or in other words, the presence of male DNA that originated from another individual, and are genetically distinct from the cells that make up the rest of the woman.



According to the study: “63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions.”

So 63% of women carry male DNA cells that live in their brains. Obviously the researchers wanted to know where the male DNA came from.

Anyone care to guess? From the women’s fathers? No. Your father’s DNA combines with your mother’s to create your unique DNA. So where else could it come from?

Through the study the researchers assumed that the most likely answer was that all male DNA found living in the female brain came from a male pregnancy. That was the safe, politically correct assumption. But these researchers were living in denial.

Because when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant, let alone with a male child, they STILL found male DNA cells prevalent in the female brain.

At this point the scientists didn’t know what the hell was going on. Confused, they did their best to hide the evidence until they could understand and explain it. They buried it in numerous sub studies and articles, but if you sift through them all you will find the damning statement, the one line that gives the game away and explains exactly where these male DNA cells come from.

What are they so afraid of?

“CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.“

So according to the scientists, the possible sources of the male DNA cells living in the women’s brains are:

an abortion the woman didn’t know about
a male twin that vanished
an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation
sexual intercourse
Considering the fact that 63% of women have male DNA cells residing in the recesses of their brain, which of the above possibilities do you think is the most likely origin of the male DNA?

The first three options apply to a very small percentage of women. They couldn’t possibly account for the 63% figure. The fourth option? It’s rather more common.

The answer is 4. Sex.

This has very important ramifications for women. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you for life. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had been carrying the living male DNA inside them for well over 50 years.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and swims until it crashes headlong into a wall, and then it attaches and burrows into your flesh. If it’s in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then it digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine.

Like something out of a scifi movie, it becomes a part of you and you can’t get rid of it.

We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/women-retain-dna/

Fake news.

looks like the rest of the seed did end up somewhere

How to make fake news

Quote a study which is honest, and back ups your first issue

But no other study but make up stuff for your leading and final conclusions

Rpk modus operandi.

Talk fact selit crap

Wtf? The study have't concluded already say is sex. Bodoh to the max, Science need strong backing to make hypothesis, not suka suka say which one is more likely

Wimmenz

Horse sheet.

As real as vaccine cause autism research
You think that easy to keep other people's dna?

Lel. Bodo only believe.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and swims until it crashes headlong into a wall, and then it attaches and burrows into your flesh. If it’s in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then it digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine.

This most stupid thing I have read today

Gay people bu++s3x will also collect foreign sperm dna up their ass. Good topic for research.

lol, the stupid things men would believe to demean women. lol

All millions of sperm will be digest by stomach acid

Nutritional components like amino acid and carbohydrate will be absorb into the blood

The rest become tail

True setory

FTFY

Yup but basically the fact is just a front for all the lies

The website you mentioned didn't outright saying it cannot happen. They just said it was not the reason every time.

This post has been edited by rauma: Aug 9 2018, 03:39 AM

Let me quote the bits you hv missed reading from Snopes article

1. Rating: FALSE

2.The linked study, in fact, does not once mention sexual intercourse as a proposed mechanism

3. makes only passing reference to the possibility that sexual intercourse alone could contribute male microchirality to women, noting that the issue has yet to be studied.

4. That paper, which was fairly limited in its dataset, makes it clear that the sexual intercourse transfer of male chimerism remains entirely speculative:

5. Far from demonstrating that 100 percent of a woman’s male sexual partners have male cells that de facto become part of their body, the studies cobbled together by YourNewsWire show that even if sexual intercourse transferred cells from a male that later became incorporated into the female partner’s body (which science has only speculated about at this point), it clearly wouldn’t happen in all cases.


6. We are also unsure, for the record, what motivation would exist for scientists to hide the truth about male microchimerism in the first place.

This post has been edited by EdBaaBaa: Aug 9 2018, 04:09 AM

macam zerg pulak

But never says it will never happen, maintaining it's speculative.

They try to not give definite statement there. And even if it does, it won't happen in all cases... Avoiding saying "it will never happen", instead goes for maybe sometimes, but not all the time.

I'm focusing on them trying to make sure they don't give a 100% verdict, leaving room for later in case it turns out to be true.