And one thing i urge fans not to compared MAnUtd's cash to Chelsea's cash for one simple reason.

ManUtd PLC. ( at that time ) earn every single bit of cash on their own. Chelsea just took oil money from russia.

No offence , but thats the fact.

OT, bwan too early to say that la,i think chelsea still need power up the back4 ,alex wont be coming back so phone right?but getting pizarro in free transfer is a very good deal hope he don turn out crappy 

You're dead wrong about us receiving money from Glazer. Yes, they own the club, but at the same time they owe the banks like what, 600 mill?? So no, the Yanks don't give us money. They might say they do, but everyone knows they don't. They still have that big matter of that loan to the banks to settle. Cause if they do we could have bought like 10 more Andersons or Nanis. Don't forget, our profit margin is very, very high. So if they did give us money we would have loads to spend. That 40-50 mill that we spend this season we made it pretty much on our own. Our stadium sells out pretty much every game played at Old Trafford and then there's the question of merchandising and advertising. We have been making profit in the transfer market for this past 2 seasons dont forget with the sale of Ruud and the "sale" of Obi Mikel.

Today's Sportscentre:

There have only been 16 English players who have played in Champions League Finals since 1993. Italians lead the way with 90 players and the Spanish are second providing no less than 56 players.

Welsh and Scottish are British, not English. Be it an English or British core, we do have loads. Smudger, Rio, Gaz, Foster, Brown, Wazza, Scholesy, Carrick, Hargreaves that's in the first team fold. Make it British and add Giggsy and Fletcher into the equation. Our English/ British core is very strong.

Go post in your "lovely" club thread ..
Maybe they will entertain you more ...
       

I fail however to see the relevance between the no. of English players in Europe and the level of interest in the EPL. If we talking about tennis, it would be like saying Wimbledon is a boring, substandard tournament because very seldom do Englishmen make the finals.

There is a hypocrite in our midst I see. He seems to have missed the point that people don't always have a preference for the most successful league. If we all did, won't that make us glory hunters?