Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mazda CX5 Gen 2 Owners Club V2, Kodo: Soul of Motion

views
     
zeng
post Jun 29 2025, 11:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(Lego Warfare @ Jun 26 2025, 12:42 PM)
Uhhh I think I am experiencing the Mazda gear box issue now.
Yesterday while driving it sounded like my engine is stuck in low gear, my speed is not matching up to my rpm (speedometer hardly moves while tachometer increases)
Went to a auto repair shop and after checking he said could be gear box issue, usually need to overhaul the whole box which could cost 4-5k?
What he suggested trying to do is changing the gear box oil and oil treatment which cost a few hundred to see if it fixes the issue instead.

Anyone had similar experience?
*
Don't need to overhaul the gb.

During your said shifting, the transmission control valve (metallic and male) was momentarily getting stucked within the valve body (metallic part and is a female) due to impurities.

The impurities or dirts/contaminants was from a 'used and burnt' ATF, at 70K km mileage in your case.

It is not caused by ATF leaks at polymer oil seals which hardened over say, 300-500K km usage. Oil seal hardening in a 70K km AT operating in low temperature regime is, imo academic.

Hence there is no need for ATF treatment (as recommended above, with due respect).

The only thing to do is:
replace new ATF. Period.

For mineral ATF type, replace new every 40K km or below.

For fully synthetic type ATF, replace new every 100K km or below.

*Lifetime fluids classification is a Mazda (and other car manufacturers) marketing terminology, It's not a technical or lubricant terminology.

*Mazda meant lifetime as manufacturer warranty period of typically 100K km.

Note: Don't ever do ATF flushing (with due respect) in a Control Valve System that always comes with super duper tight clearance at say, 1-5 microns.

1 micron = 1000 nano.

Just my 2 sen.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jun 29 2025, 11:41 AM
zeng
post Jun 30 2025, 11:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Jun 29 2025, 12:49 PM)
Any reason why can't do the ATF flushing? In my idea, once done the flushing, it will replace the 100% of old ATF instead of says 60% of old ATF via normal ATF change method
*
Yes, flushing can get near 100% of old used ATF fluid out in one go whereas typical 'drain and fill' cannot and like you say some 60% in one go.

Hence typical 'drain and fill' ATF fluid change (which may not be possible by oe design in Mazda) may need more 'goes'.

However typical workshop has another method in 'pneumatic extraction and fill' which would get out say 90% or thereabouts of old fluid in one go. Of course one can go for 2 'goes' or more as desired.

Besides, flushing method in ATF fluid change in North America has resulted (statistically) in more cases of AT problems than the 'drain/air extraction and fill'' method, probably due to violent and uncontrolled fluid agitation in flushing method whereas the other method is of much lesser violent fluid agitation, I guess.

This post has been edited by zeng: Jun 30 2025, 12:01 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0443sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 07:37 PM