Ha ha ha ha you don't even read your link.
Bulk of the sales not from Chatime la.
Chatime brand sux.
Their other brand doing better.

It was made to look like that bodo
Don't trust anything on website
La Kaffa owned by gangster
U don't know how they quietly take control of other bubble tea shop

It was made to look like that bodo
Don't trust anything on website
La Kaffa owned by gangster
U don't know how they quietly take control of other bubble tea shop

If they are gangster how come they didn't do anything to Loob?

Brian loo break contract
La kaffa the one evil gangster

Malaysian buat taik
Taiwan company jahat

Wth mentality
Plotek kuat sangat

Brian loo break contract, Taiwan gangster didn't break his legs?

sei jor lanc owner hehe lawdretep

Ya lor
If break his spine
Baru betul gangster

Ni la kaffa use proper channel
Use legal method
Send multiple letters

Civilized course of action

Unlike brian loo

http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/loob...der-tealive-ops

Loob to appeal against halt order on Tealive ops

KUALA LUMPUR: Tealive owner and franchiser Loob Holding Sdn Bhd, which is in a legal dispute with Chatime bubble tea stores’ principal La Kaffa International Co Ltd, is now appealing to the apex court to reverse a ruling granted to La Kaffa to stop Loob from operating a competing business against Chatime for two years. This came after the Court of Appeal dismissed Loob’s application for a stay of the court’s decision on granting the injunction applied for by La Kaffa.

“The company (Loob) has instructed its lawyers to file for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against the Court of Appeal’s decision given on June 27, 2018, and it has been informed that the application was filed yesterday (Wednesday). Its lawyers have been further instructed to make the necessary application to the Federal Court to maintain [the] status quo and the said application was filed earlier this morning (yesterday),” Loob said in a statement.

La Kaffa, on the other hand, lauded the Court of Appeal’s decision, saying the verdict reflects Malaysia’s justice system on a positive note and would strengthen the confidence of more international franchisers to build trade ties in the country. La Kaffa also said it was mindful of the impact the court’s decision will have on the livelihood of the employees and outlet owners who will be directly affected by the injunction order.

Therefore, Chatime Malaysia managing director Aliza Ali said “within the scope allowed by the relevant law”, the company would welcome the return of former Chatime franchisees and employees.

“Our decision to allow affected outlets to return and re-operate under Chatime was made with regard to the overwhelming request in light of the recent injunction granted by the court. Our doors are open to the employees and outlet owners who have found themselves in this precarious position today. They are our priority at the moment,” said Aliza in a statement.

In his written judgement yesterday, Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Dr Hamid Sultan Abu Backer said the stay was sought pending the disposal of Loob’s application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against the Court of Appeal’s order.

However, he said Loob’s affidavit did not state if there was an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court, which was “fatal” to Loob’s stay application as there were no proceedings pending in the Federal Court to grant the stay.

The dismissal was also on the grounds that Loob’s act of changing the name of Chatime to Tealive had breached its contractual obligations to La Kaffa under their franchise agreement, as well as the country’s franchise law. Nevertheless, Hamid said the dismissal yesterday would not bar Loob from seeking a stay in the Federal Court.

can someone give me tldr version of why tealive cannot operate?

legally speaking they are using their own brand name and own tea taste (although similar but all bubble tea taste same no?) so why la kaffa can stop them from operating?

Because brian loo sign  contract with la kaffa that he wont start similar business like chatime for certain amount of years

Hence why people been saying
He should let other peoples start tealive
Start new outlet in new place
While he settle his issue with la kaffa

But no. He converted his chatime outlet  to tealive
Cari pasal
Of course kena lor

When did he signed it and why he signed it?
Anyway why dont he just "sell" his business to his sister/brother/mother/father/grandfather/grandmother and then they start tealive ?

that would loophole the contract i guess

When he first want to bring chatime to Malaysia
Why? Cuz he need chatime business la
Why else?

Cuz he bodo
Usually, those who breach contract memang iq level tenggiling

I guess he thought he could win the case coz apparently i hear la kaffa suddenly cancel contract before due date right?

I guess he thought he could win the case coz apparently i hear la kaffa suddenly cancel contract before due date right?

I guess he thought he could win the case coz apparently i hear la kaffa suddenly cancel contract before due date right?

why you still side loob holding?

its very obvious loob did wrong.

why you still side loob holding?

its very obvious loob did wrong.

so la kaffa cancel contract means la kaffa is wrong?

it is alright for loob to buy their cheap raw materials from unauthorised suppliers?