Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FI/RE - Financial Independence / Retire Early, Share your experience

views
     
aspartame
post Jul 4 2018, 09:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ Jul 3 2018, 01:29 PM)
All, there are active communities in oversea that working on FIRE by hard saving, investing and living below our means.
For sure there are also FI or already RE people in here.

Appreciate to share your experience; Pre-FIRE and Post-FIRE life.

Thanks

#I’m working towards FIRE and currently saving/invest 50-60% of my monthly salary. (On top of this around 20-25% spent for commitment like ASB loans and properties).

Before someone asking, I like to make it clear that I'm currently under full expat package which company provide accommodation, transportation and COLA.

BUT AGAIN, I like to hear sharing from all who working towards FIRE so we can learn in term of planning, lifestyle, achievement, obstacles and etc.
*
It is only logical that only a small % of population can achieve FIRE, especially early FIRE. Otherwise, there won't be enough rats running in the treadmill to generate power to sustain the whole society. So, how to become the minority? To do what the majority can't or won't do. Spending is easy. Saving is hard. So, u must do the opposite. Savings is earnings less spending. Do your best to climb up the ladddr to increase earnings. Then, while earnings increase, do not increase spending like most people do. Maintain spending, increase savings. Invest the savings. That's it.

Many aim to achieve FIRE before age 40. Close to impossible unless u live like a monk after that. Why quit when earnings is at its highest? Delay to about 45 to 50 at least would be good. Meantime, I know it sounds contradictory, but u dun want to live like a peasant now. Whatever people enjoy now, u also go for it but less frequently. It's a fine line.. because spending begets more spending. This is where discipline comes in. Otherwise, life is too dull. Why sit at home when u r most youthful. Go for those low expense activities. "You dun want to save up sex for when u r old."..Warran Buffett.
aspartame
post Jul 15 2018, 04:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(yklooi @ Jul 15 2018, 12:19 PM)
:confused:
mid 20's
started to work 5 years ago in KL after graduating from over seas (only do partime there)
no $$ helps from FAMA
70~80% of income used for investment

invested in properties, from just 3 years ago

have not let go of any properties yet. (so no flipping here)

having a 7 digit net worth....yes net worth

I think it is ok to get loans for the 1st one and 2 properties, assuming the pay is used to sustain the repayment of your first 1 & 2nd properties.
assuming again 10% down payment (100k for 1 million property)

the rental yield of these 2 properties must be definitely very good and stable to be able to get sustained income to get another property ...

thus whatever earned from the 2 properties will be use to get the 3rd property (30% downpayment at 300K for the 1 million property)

then, the rental yield of these 3 properties must be definitely very good and stable to be able to get sustained income to get another properties ...

it is amazing, how much money can be made (7 digits net worth) in 3 years

you hit the jack pot....repeat the cycles few times,, one can buy a village.

thumbup.gif  :thumbsup:  notworthy.gif
Ramjade....can try follow this?... since you're having some attributes similarity...young, frugal and money saving smart...
*
First purchase of prop in 2015....that time till now, property price can say stagnant .... means 3 properties can assume no capital gains lah...

Means net worth of RM1mil earned during this 5 years all from salary...average 1 year save RM200k or RM16,700 per month... this means your average income per month is about RM24k (since savings of 70%)....(ignoring income tax because also ignoring employer EPF contributions for ease of calculation )

Otherwise, I also cannot see how net worth of 1 mil...

Conclusion: average ktards income per month is above RM20k
aspartame
post Jul 15 2018, 10:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(LoTek @ Jul 15 2018, 06:26 PM)
I see my post is dubious to many.

Since my studies was fully covered including expenses, whatever I earned part time, i slowly brought back home, its 5 figures in SGD. And no I'm not in some illegal or immoral industry. I worked all sorts of jobs there in whatever spare time I had, photography, crew, promoter, tutor...anywhere from 8-50 sgd an hour type of jobs. Since starting full time work, which started in KL and still is in KL, my income has always been in 5 figure territory. I do not only rely on FD to grow savings that is not invested in props.

1st and 2nd prop is residential, subsequent is commercial. 1st was a mistake, bought from dev, yield is just over 4% which don't even meet the interest: am trying to exit. 2nd was the effort of 8 months of patience, non stop viewing and lowballing sellers until I got a unit more than 6 figures below market value. Believe seller was in dire financial difficulties, and he actually already had an interested buyer, who just wanted to push him another few k down from his asking, I offered to buy at the asking price and got it. Student rental play prop, yield is 9% counted at the market value, more than 10% at the price I got, incl renovate and furnish. I don't think I am not overestimating the value of my props: I take an average of the latest transactions listed on brickz and from the owner group chats.

Sorry to those who feel bad or disbelieve me, I'm being honest, I don't want to boast, I just wanted to inspire some young people my age smile.gif and its not about the income. Its about the discipline in work, expenses and investments. Some of my work days are as long as 14 hours when I need to. Never buy investments without weeks (or months) of study, made that mistake on my first prop. Never overspend. Some of my friends with 4k income a month probably think I earn less than them, from my lifestyle. I grew up in my grandfathers' attic, sleeping on the floor, eating rice with fruits and veges that me and my grandma stole from neighbours' gardens (sorry guys XD) or expiring old meat that my uncle, a wet market worker, was allowed to bring home. When I see people my age spending 110% of their income, with the 10% from parents or credit, and all the spending going to non investment expenditure, it just pisses me off.
*
Impressive! At such young age, u r already at least top 1% or less of your peers. Once yr assets snowball, your wealth will grow exponentially. You now have capital, discipline, high income and most importantly time on your side. Your future is limitless! Kudos!
aspartame
post Jul 17 2018, 12:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(rapple @ Jul 17 2018, 09:58 AM)
Sometimes I found it funny, property investor took the latest value of the property price and then valued that property at that price, just to make their own net worth higher.

It's like people who keep stocks but valued their stock at selling price instead of the cost price.

Sorry, it looks unrealistic. There's no actual gain but a number for boasting only.
*
I find your thinking funny. If net worth is not valued at market price, then at what price? Cost price? Lol. Guess Warren Buffett is just a millionaire.
aspartame
post Jul 17 2018, 02:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(rapple @ Jul 17 2018, 01:37 PM)
I wouldn't valued my properties at market price.

When you valued your property at market price, then the return from your rental income will drop unless he can raised the rental as he wish. He claims his average rental yield at 6%. Is the 6% yield on his property is based on market price or cost price?
A small Company where I work, I only have 1 account to work on. I will let you guess, how much time I need to finish one month of accounting work?

Company that has less than 1m revenue per year and requires monthly accounts, I can charge at least 300 per month. My time cost is probably less than 3 hours/month.

Now, you know my average fees / hour, do you still think 1:3 ratio is not achievable given the time i have at work and after work.

Edit: The only thing I need more, is the connections. As accounting work is all confidential, I can't go sell my service because I'm unknown to them. Most of my clients is recommended by friends or clients.
*
Calculation of net worth should be at market price, whether we are talking about property or stocks. If you personally want to value at cost price, of course you can, but u can't say u feel funny because others value at market price. Those who value their net worth at market price are free to apply a 10% or more discount to whatever net worth to derive their own conservative net worth. I personally will value stocks at market price and properties at average of last few transacted price. I dun apply discounts to this figure .

For both stock and properties , there are market yields and yield on cost depending on what base u choose for your denominator. In any case , yields have no relevance in the calculation of net worth. Net worth is new worth. Yield on net worth is another thing.

This post has been edited by aspartame: Jul 17 2018, 02:08 PM
aspartame
post Jul 17 2018, 02:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(rapple @ Jul 17 2018, 02:39 PM)
You are right that yield will not shown in any net worth statement but it still comes from the properties.

How can you valued your properties at market price and have your yield based on the cost price. Isn't this misleading on the yield?

Are you going to calculate your dividends received against the current stock market value also?
*
I seldom calculate yields on properties except when I am looking to buy. I more regularly calculate yield on stocks based on market price to determine buying or selling decisions. Yield on cost is quite irrelevant to me because cost price is history and historical yield is useless except maybe u want to shiok sendiri and say u have locked in a high yield based on cost.
aspartame
post Aug 6 2018, 09:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(chonghe @ Aug 6 2018, 07:11 PM)
I like the idea of financial freedom/independence, mainly because of the option to quit the job if I want to, no need to hang on to the job just because of the paycheck
This world is realistic, any company can, and will sack anyone if they would like to, as long as they can find a cheaper substitute.
So we have got to have an option for ourselves, i.e., our plan B

Have been working towards it for few years

Don't think RM 1M is enough though, perhaps at least RM 5M, enough to separate a few portions, e.g., 1 for FD, 1 for long term investment and 1 for short term investment or the like (didn't plan for so details as things changes all the time)
Anyway I tihink if can reach RM 5M net capital, then with the ability, there should be no problem at all to be FI/RE and do the things that I want to do

All the best guys
*
To be safe, need at least RM10mil.

aspartame
post Sep 10 2018, 02:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
I think part of the reason capitalism works has got to do with the allure of riches , including the freedom that comes with it. If there is a "law" preventing early retirement and hence ”preventing loss of productivity".... I am sure the drive to excel will be much less across society ..in short, why accumulate wealth if one can never ever stop work if he wants to?

Another point I would like to make is - I think only a small number of people can achieve full financial independence by age 55.... an even smaller % can achieve at age 40 to 45... the % is so small that it is negligible to productivity
aspartame
post Sep 10 2018, 03:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 10 2018, 03:13 PM)
I think those with FIRE mindset are not ambitious. They are contented bunch of people

If you read back the pages, they are talking about RM2k to RM5k per month to retire.

With such small amount, capitalism failed big time.

Coming back to analogy of RE and smoking. You can see the trend of enacting laws that “preventing/discouraging” both acts. Smoking become more and more restricted. And EPF contribution/withdrawing age deferment and extending our official retirement age are being talked about more and more. It doesn’t only happen in malaysia, but all around the world
RE is a trend. And my hypothesis is coming from the Macro-Economics point of view that RE is a selfish act that if a sizeable population RE, it would have an adverse effect on the economy

Again I give you the smoking analogy. You can argue that the smokers population is very small thus the effect to the other non-smoker is negligible. But regardless of the number, smoking is a selfish act. Because it affects people around you. And when half of our population becomes smokers, then it would become a big problem.
*
I am not sure smoking analogy is appropriate. Smoking is discouraged..yes. Extending retirement age is exactly because most people cannot achieve FI by age 55 to 60 and hence have to work longer...otherwise they will run out of money after age 55 and becomes a social problem..

There is a difference between "trend to FIRE" and "actual FIRE” Yes, there is an increasing desire to FIRE. How that trend translates to actual achievement of FIRE is not known. I suspect the % achieving FIRE will remain low.

aspartame
post Sep 10 2018, 03:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 10 2018, 03:40 PM)
I think so too. FIRE although is a trend, but no many people will achieve it.

But in my hypothesis (and remain as a hypothesis), if a sizeable population achieve RE, it would have adverse effect on the economy. It is not a good thing. And a selfish act like smoking
*
I know what you mean. There are some who take this to the extreme. They save like mad, up to 70%, and then they "retire" at age 35, living on subsistence level of passive income, and they call it "freedom"... yes, taken to the extreme, it is toxic!
aspartame
post Sep 10 2018, 04:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 10 2018, 03:54 PM)
And the root cause of their problem is their disliking of the job. RE is just a get around. Not the true solution

If they have a job they are passionate about, they won’t retire at all  biggrin.gif

All in all, what I want to say is FI is a good thing. But RE is a bad thing, both personal or society/economy as a whole
*
I don't think that there are jobs that people can remain passionate about their whole life. Certainly, not enough people are having such jobs. I don't think such "dream jobs" exist often enough. I also think FI is definitely a good thing. However, I dun think RE is necessarily a bad thing. In fact, personally to me, RE is a good thing. If one needs to stay in a job to kill time or to remain "productive" in the eyes of society, that in itself is quite pathetic. Of course, if one personally derives lots of pleasure in continuing to work even after achieving FI, then, by all means, go ahead. But there is no one size fits all..
aspartame
post Sep 10 2018, 04:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(NightHeart @ Sep 10 2018, 04:09 PM)
Macro economics = seeing things in a very big picture.

If more & more people are being miser or "living frugal", generally the economy will go bearish as majority population are holding onto their hard earned money. Money is something that's meant to be passed around, hence the term "currency". The more it moves, the economy will grow. Government implements either expansionary or contractionary fiscal policies to drive up to or lower down the economic growth.

Ultimately the FIRE trend will burn back at the same people who practices it if more & more people follow suit, making it a trend until it affects the macro-economy. Lesser spending leads to lesser economic growth. Lesser economic growth leads to possible deflation or worse; stagflation. Then investors gain lesser & lesser from their investments, pushing their FIRE goals further & further. In the worse case scenario, investing yields nothing & saving loses its value every minute.

FIRE is only ideal in a bullish economy. Where majority of the people are spending & actively contributing to the economy. That's when lotsa bank/govt borrowing is happening, driving up cost of funds & pushing up the market's ROI rates. When the ROI is high, investors' portfolio flourish as well. 

So the whole concept of FIRE or the number of FIRE people are kept in balance by the market forces. When too many people jumped on the FIRE bandwagon, the economy goes bearish. Hence, pushing people's FIRE goals further or forcing FIREd people back into the workforce - essentially reducing the number of FIRE people.
*
In a way, we never have to fret that enough people will FIRE to tank the economy. Economies will balance on its own. If enough people are on the path to FIRE and thus shrinking the economy, returns will be low and hence those who are borderline FIRE will be forced back into the workforce because their passive income can no longer sustain them.
aspartame
post Sep 14 2018, 09:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Garysydney @ Sep 14 2018, 08:28 AM)
Don't get me wrong - i actually feel quite young at heart.

I look at myself in the mirror and i see a lot of grey hair (i color my hair black but there are a lot of parts where it is hard to color like around the ears so i just leave it as is) - i have even noticed a couple of grey strands on the eye-brows!! It is just that the body is slowing down a lot and we cannot do anything about it!! I even find it hard to get up after i squat down! These are things that makes us feel old. Like in winter here, i have to put a scarf around my neck when i get up in the morning!! I never used to have to do that in my 20/30s!! This is one of the reasons why i want to retire in Msia where it is a lot warmer. I prefer warm to cold (esp nowadays when i am older). Sydney (even though not very cold compared to Melb) is still a bit cold for older residents esp in winter.
*
Uncle Gary ah, can you state again briefly why you always said u wanted to retire in Malaysia but you still in Sydney oh? I think it is like this...I think it is because you do not want to give up PR (and the accompanying retirement and medical benefits) and your wife say it is easy money working there but you still like it more in Malaysia. What about your wife? Her preference is to stay where? And, you said you travel quite often to Malaysia also... is this arrangement good enough to satisfy your craving for Malaysia? Lol. I see that you are one confused uncle.. you are 一脚踏两船... (2 legs in different boats)...lol.... another concern is whether you have enough to retire in Malaysia which bro Showtime assures you that you have more than enough... so any changes to your plan now?

One simple question: do you have enough resources to spend half year in Malaysia (when winter in Sydney)and half year in Sydney or something like that? To meet PR requirements ...won't that be ideal?

aspartame
post Sep 14 2018, 10:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(cfkoon @ Sep 14 2018, 10:01 AM)
He is not confused. Who are you to judge his plans and capabilities when it comes to where he wants to stay or retire. That is entirely up to him whether you like it or not. He already said he prefer to retire in Msia due to warm weather being his preference, but maybe he has to think about uprooting his entire family or such.

Whether or not he has enough resources to do what he wants, its his own matter, he is just sharing his own experience and past. Y

Here's a simple question for you : Can you update yourself on Australian PR Visa requirements before asking dumb questions like having to live in Sydney for half a year to maintain his visa?
*
Lol... chill bro... uncle Gary and me are buddies ...
aspartame
post Sep 14 2018, 04:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Garysydney @ Sep 14 2018, 02:28 PM)
Actually both my wife and I prefer to live in Msia. I haven't gone back yet because the preservation age (when you can start accessing your super) for those born in 1962 is 57 which is next year. Both my wife and myself are born in 1962 so both of us can start drawing out our super next year. I would probably try living in KL next year and if we don't like it, we can always come back to Sydney. I have about 40+ weeks of long service leave (which can be taken on half pay to reduce the tax) so i plan to start taking my long service leave around July next year.

I can take close to 2 years (on half pay) of leave before i decide whether i want to return to my job. My wife loves KL (as all her relatives are in KL and she has no relatives in Sydney) and she will probably 'force' me to stay on even if i don't quite like it in KL  icon_question.gif . Even on half pay, i will still be getting about rm10k/mth which i calculate should be quite sufficient for both of us. I can draw down a little on my super if that is not enough. My wife also has rental from her 2 apartments in MK which will give her about rm6k/mth net. I suspect we probably won't need to draw on our super until i retire officially after i have exhausted all my leave and long service leave.

We can afford to spend 6mths every year in each country but i find life a lot more interesting in KL esp after retirement (and we have no children). Sydney can be very boring (even though we have plenty of friends here after having lived here for so long) in old age. You see a lot of lonely old people here.
*
Since both you and your wife also prefer to stay in Malaysia, straight away apply MM2H and come back lah. Why wait? You have spent so many years in Sydney and spending more years there is just meaningless if your heart is not there. If you have sufficient retirement income, you can afford to forgo the benefits of PR. Seriously, unless you have kidney or other existing diseases , the most you ever need is 100k in any kind of diseases. Anything more than that, you are better off being dead. Plus, many people live long lives without even going to clinic. Just enjoy your remaining years in Malaysia lah. You have more than enough, especially when you do not have kids . Want so much for what?
aspartame
post Sep 14 2018, 04:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 14 2018, 04:19 PM)
Haha bro, you are definitely young and in a hurry  biggrin.gif

At our age, everything is toned down. Not so hot blooded. Final decision can always wait. Gary has already thought of everything for a few years, and will still be thinking until the last minutes ! 

But eventually one day you will be like us....
*
Oh ok, ha ha, agree that uncle Gary is likely to postpone until he cannot postpone, and that is being prudent. What I mean is... application for MM2H can begin right away without jeopardising PR ship. Meanwhile, still can think about it..
aspartame
post Sep 14 2018, 04:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(sky18 @ Sep 14 2018, 04:19 PM)
Bro... He still healthy n below Aus official retirement age. Still many years ahead. Lol
*
Didn't mean it in any bad way cos technically everyone of us has our own remaining years, whether long or short.. god knows... maybe should say "golden years".. ha ha
aspartame
post Sep 17 2018, 10:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Garysydney @ Sep 17 2018, 05:40 AM)
I think it will be a lot easier to achieve FI for singles and couples without kids. Couples with young kids may have to defer the FI timeline by quite a significant number of years esp those parents that are thinking of an overseas education. Kids nowadays cost a bomb and unless you have both partners earning significantly, that figure for achieving FI may have to start with a 6 (i.e. 60s)  devil.gif . Even though public education is free in Aust, i think i have been able to retire a lot earlier than my peers due to me having no kids.

P's: I noticed there are quite a lot of financial-savvy contributors judging by the comments that have been posted in Finance, Business threads.
*
Agree that kids are a major major drag on one's ability to achieve FI/RE. It's a drag from the moment they are out of the womb. The cost goes up exponentially till they climax in the 3/4 years of tertiary education. Sometimes it drags on when parents decide to pay for kids wedding and down payment for their house ... finally, kiasu parents will also plan their inheritance ! Add all this up and with the power of compounding , I think one sacrifices at least RM1 mil upwards per kid ....

So, for those not willing to make such sacrifices, better plan ahead....

P/s nice story from rogue trader uncle Gary smile.gif
aspartame
post Sep 21 2018, 09:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(langstrasse @ Sep 21 2018, 07:07 PM)
I've been reading this thread since the start with much excitement. Especially since I've followed the FI/RE sub-Reddit  for several years now but as others here have mentioned, there isn't much content there focused on the Malaysian context (or at least I've not found it yet)
However, now after 600+ posts, I'm confused on what's the current intent of this thread.

TS's original intent states :
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
If we are too strict about the topic of FI/RE, then we might as well read articles about it to ensure it is on topic. Forums are great because of the anonymous interactions. The things discussed so far are not exactly off topic as they are relevant to others aspects of FI/RE that may derail the plan to FI/RE. Take away these relevant musings and the topic become very dry.

This post has been edited by aspartame: Sep 21 2018, 09:10 PM
aspartame
post Sep 23 2018, 09:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Sep 23 2018, 08:06 AM)
hmm.

for those who already fire.

what you guys do after that. for if no work like no objective in life. lol
*
If you think about it, when you are working for others, no matter how high ranking you are, you are just running other people's "errands".

When you FI/RE, every little task you do is for yourself or family or people you would like to help. In short, you determine how you spend your time.

Which "objective in life" is more meaningful?

It's just so wrong to equate work with objective in life. If you FI, you have the choice to RE. If you find that life is without objective if you RE, then by all means continue to go to work. It's your choice! I know I wouldn't! Ha ha.. just rambling again...

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0981sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 03:56 PM