when we sign the deal in 2007 it is also involved local companies in manufacturing parts for the plane as well (one of the economic offset) so the largest iinm CTRM will supply composite material to airbus military, another company will manufactured pylons and there is another company that produce some parts for landing gears (can't recall which parts). Also airbus provide university partnership in aviation technology along with industrial training and work placement for the eligible ada lagi tp tak ingt and with the delay ada lagi byk dpt tapi tak igt.
the airbus deals is huge and way better with just a mere C130J in exchange for money offered from the US.
itu pun ada jugak bising kenapa tak amik C130J... euuwwww
agreed that all that can be nice but isn't always announced nor considered as part of the deal
and C130 has got massive reputation while A400M was a totally new player
while A400M does have certain performance advantages over C130, the program issues also raised questions at the time, in fact even to this day
We place more importance on making sure the defence budget goes to local vendors and manufacturers in closed bidding deals
We do not develop the local industry to build world class weapons and equipment at domestic prices, instead we allow local manufacturers to get away with inferior quality work for high prices
Also we buy foreign equipment based on vendors' willingness to accommodate mysterious overheads which end up costing twice the market price of the equipment
Plus we do not play with other countries insisting we want to do our own thing in all areas so other countries also don't sell us equipment at cheaper prices
Furthermore, extend the problem of mysterious overheads to the entire country so that the whole country underperforms, ensuring the economy is crippled and hence there is less money for defence budget
And finally the underperformance damages the country until MYR is 3x lower than SGD which means it is literally 3x more expensive to buy military equipment
Argentina's navy says searchers deep in the Atlantic have found the missing submarine ARA San Juan, which disappeared with 44 crewmen aboard almost a year ago to the date.
The vessel was detected 800 metres deep in waters off the Valdes Peninsula in Argentine Patagonia, the navy statement said.
The navy said a "positive identification" had been made by a remote-operated submersible from the American ship Ocean Infinity, which was hired for the latest search for the missing vessel.
It had earlier tweeted that it was investigating a "point of interest" where a 60-metre-long object had been detected.
The discovery was announced just two days after families of the missing sailors held a commemoration one year after the sub disappeared on November 15, 2017.
On Thursday, on the anniversary of the disappearance, President Mauricio Macri said the families of the submariners should not feel alone and delivered an "absolute and non-negotiable commitment" to find "the truth".
Mr Macri promised a full investigation after the submarine was lost. Federal police raided naval bases and other buildings last January as part of the probe, soon after the Government dismissed the head of the navy.
The San Juan was returning to its base in the coastal city of Mar del Plata when contact was lost.
The navy has previously said the captain reported on November 15 that water entered the snorkel and caused one of the sub's batteries to short-circuit. The captain later communicated that it had been contained.
Some hours later, an explosion was detected near the time and place where the San Juan was last heard from.
The navy said the blast could have been caused by a "concentration of hydrogen" triggered by the battery problem reported by the captain.
Argentina gave up hope of finding survivors after an intense search aided by 18 countries, but the navy has continued searching for the vessel.
The German-built diesel-electric TR-1700 class submarine was commissioned in the mid-1980s and was most recently refitted between 2008 and 2014.
During the $US12 million ($16 million) retrofitting, the vessel was cut in half and had its engines and batteries replaced.
Experts said refits could be difficult because they involve integrating systems produced by different manufacturers, and even the tiniest mistake during the cutting phase can put the safety of the ship and crew at risk.
This post has been edited by KLboy92: Nov 17 2018, 04:39 PM
Ocean Infinity was the same ship hired for our MH370 search few months ago wasn't it?
Dunno about the ship, but the company is named Ocean Infinity, yes
Apparently it was not easy, the wreck location had already been surveyed twice last year but due to the shape of the seafloor the wreck wasn't found then
Guys, what are your views on a hypothetical Joint R&D project between Malaysia and Singapore on developing new weapons to challenge China in the South China Sea? Is it a viable option for Malaysia in its current financial situation? Would the benefits outweigh the costs?
Singapore use a lot of Yahudi tech, and there's too much rivalry. We're allies of convenience, not allies of ideology.
triggered a bit in how the writer of the article is more interested to highlight the scandal, than telling more about what is the sub's and RMN's activity over there
3 actually, if u could count the third line from the top.
die2 must selit that scandal in almost every scorpene news/article meh?
The one at the top must be editorial mistake cause almost word for word repeat the bottom
Yeah. It's a common media practice. You read any F35 article sure will tekan
Face it, our Scorpene hasn't actually done anything other than be involved in scandal. I mean, it didn't even deploy on any ops or ex that is known of. Even US subs will have some notes in this regard.
Not saying it is useless. Just saying from the POV of someone trying to write an article.
lel everytime the sub deploys out in the water its either ops or ex lar even got multiple international ex ady with french, australia, usa some of the personnel have clocked 10k hours underwater on its operation
even the news itself reporting of an ongoing ops wtf u smokin' dude?
by ops I guess I mean "high profile" ops, eg sometimes US will release statement saying USS whatever participated in anti-drug ops
by ex again I mean high profile ex with photo ops together with other nations and short brief about the exercises
few such news of our subs which is well known, although this article itself is fairly decent
this is all public media management, Malaysians memang know how to do this but only for politics and vroom topics
ATM should hire some cybertroopers of its own mang