Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Widescreen Thread V2.0, All widescreen discussions here

views
     
youngmasterho
post May 23 2007, 02:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
you might not be able to see more details in 22", given the fact that their native resolution is the same.

in fact, 22" monitor will be 'blurer' than a 20" because of d the dots distance (i might not be using a technical term).

whistling.gif

QUOTE(davidgm16 @ May 23 2007, 01:01 PM)
hey guys.. i just roughly go thru the previous topics, i noticed that 20' to 22' actually can't feel that is a huge diff being human sight.
but i'm wondering, they r in same max screen resolution (1680x1050), then will the 20' is looks sharper than the 22', since the 22' is bigger but with same resolution? unsure.gif
*
youngmasterho
post Jul 12 2007, 05:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 12 2007, 03:32 PM)
is waiting for PC fair to buy monitor or buy now? especially the 22" wide which is 849 now? please advice.
*
even 24" dell has come to historically low at rm1899....

i would rather wait for merdeka month n hope there will another round of price slash!

tongue.gif
youngmasterho
post Jul 15 2007, 12:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
sharing my 2cts here...

To customize a desired resolution, you need to install an nVidia software and it will normally appear in your control panel.

i'm using an nVidia 6600LE VGA card and it has a customized resolution you can create but you will be prompted by taking a risk of non-display.

i bought a dell 228wfp in the last PC fair and changed to a new customized resolution of 1440x900 and it works perfectly!

you might want 2 try??!!


QUOTE(badguy86 @ Jul 14 2007, 12:59 PM)
Ya I would love to if only I could... Because My resolution range in 'Display properties' only from [800X600, 1024X768, 1152X864, 1280X1024, 1600X900, 1680X1050] unsure.gif ?
*
youngmasterho
post Jul 17 2007, 09:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
may i know what's the dvd movie software you use?

i am just very surprised to hear that your dvd playback can be upscaled to 1680x1050.

please enlighten me....

notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

QUOTE(mengfui @ Jul 16 2007, 04:50 PM)
I'm very less into gaming. Mostly use for movie purpose. As long as my onboard can stand for DVD playback for 1680 x 1050 @ 60Hz smoothly then ok already. HD wise I have to get a PCI-E graphic card for sure. Maybe ATI HD2400 or nVidia 8400.
*
youngmasterho
post Jul 17 2007, 11:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
juz 2 share my dell experience here...

when i received my order, there is a VGA cable already attached to the monitor while a DVI cable is sealed in a plastic bag - all in the same box.

normally if the monitor has 15-pin D-Sub (VGA) and DVI inputs, they should supply you all cables. if not, call up the sales rep and make a request for DVI cable delivery.



QUOTE(thankyou @ Jul 17 2007, 10:11 AM)
hi, mine arriving within this two days too... and i saw DELL package list, they never mention they will provide either VGA/DVI cable... so any of you can confirm DELL do not include DVI cable? if no, i'll get it today... and welcome my new baby once its arrive....
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 1 2007, 01:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
my 2 cents thoughts, by 2010 or earlier:

as a rational manufacturer, to make sense in their product positioning:
1) 24" and above - high end models (to maximize the potentials recorded in blue-ray or hddvd)
- entry level models (to satisfy a budget pc user to get a trill of hd era)

2) 22" - main stream models (they will make less response time or higher contrast ratio - as good as an lcd tv)

3) 20" and below - end of product life....



QUOTE(ahpaul82 @ Jul 31 2007, 12:49 AM)
user posted image

24 inch displays for everyone! The end of the 22"
Saw this article,
but i haven't got time to read it  sweat.gif

i should go for 24' instead of 22' ...  doh.gif
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 1 2007, 02:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
a manufacturer can never produce the same size of model forever, given the presence of competition by others. no doubt, a manufacturer will normally demand for cost down (approx. 5% yearly) in order to keep for price advantage, however, it would be even more cost-effective to produce larger monitor size due to bulk order discounts, better quality in terms of response time, contrast ratio, energy saving, etc.

that's why you don't see anymore 14"/15" monitor in the mkt nw and ppl will not look for that also.

having said this, i tend to agree that 24" will EVENTUALLY replace any smaller size models, like it or not.

whistling.gif
QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 1 2007, 01:29 PM)
Well, he assume its by 2010. In the same context, dont think there will be many people looking into getting themselves 15" LCD now even though they are very popular years ago. Therefore, by a few years time where 24" and above gets cheaper, people will start looking into those model rather than the older, smaller ones..
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 3 2007, 04:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
dat's y CRT is still in production...even though the price difference is not much as compare with a 17" LCD monitor rite nw.

workers will abuse watever dat r given 2 them, nt juz monitors oni....

biggrin.gif

QUOTE(dattebayo @ Aug 1 2007, 07:33 PM)
you left out one important market segment which is small business/education premises
most of them are still using 17" CRT now
and it's not practical for all workers to use 22" wide just for daily works? it will encourage abuse later on laugh.gif
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 14 2007, 05:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
all 22" lcd monitor, be it dell, lg or samsung...can playback 720p movie without any problem as it's under its native resolution of 1050p.

however, i don't think you can get any 720p dvd movies in the market...dvds are made in 640px480p resolution...some of the dvd players especially with HDMI output, the pictures are upscaled to 720p which are 'artifacts'.

all 22" lcd monitor has an optimum resolution of 1050 lines hence it's not considered as a full HD monitor... only 24" and above are actually considered as full HD monitor
youngmasterho
post Aug 15 2007, 08:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i always have this doubt that arouses mi all the time...

y 24" and above monitor which is full HD panel are sold from 1899 (based on dell models) but a full HD LCD TV is bidding for at least 15000 (based on sony 40" x-series)

or is there any article(s) that cover the differences between a LCD monitor n LCD TV....tq
youngmasterho
post Aug 15 2007, 10:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
speaking of TV functionality...a normal LCD monitor can view any tv channels by having a TV box (internal/external)...some of the latest tv boxes can even support up to 1680x1050 (the native resolution of a 22" monitor)

you can get a normal tv box of such function above with less than rm400...

yes, there is needless to have a 40" monitor, even 30" dell monitor is too large for a desktop usage.


QUOTE(§layerXT @ Aug 15 2007, 09:51 AM)
Maybe bcoz of TV functionality that make them too expensive. Between there is still no such a 40" computer LCD.
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 21 2007, 08:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
given the same or similar specification compare to other vendors, superb after sales service and extended warranty period, dell monitors would be the cheapest in the market right now.

dell enjoys the economies of scale as the same model is supplied worldwide - of course north america remains the largest contribution to their revenues.

QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 21 2007, 08:30 AM)
Good on you there  smile.gif But be prepared as Dell LCD promotions never stops. They will always, lower the price, extend the promotion period, increase the price to about RM100 - 200 higher, and suddenly, came out with a promotion about a month later that is even cheaper than the price you get..LOL.. tongue.gif
*
youngmasterho
post Aug 23 2007, 09:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Dell 20" LCD monitor uses 8-bit monitor panel, it can Tilt, swivel, landscape or portrait viewing, S-Video, Composite, and 4xUSB 2.0 Ports which can't be found in 22" Dell monitor...that's y it's more expensive lor


QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 23 2007, 08:18 AM)
Thats a 19". Doubt Dell had any promo on the 20" to go as low as 600+. The last time i checked, the 20" is still around the range of the 22" which is about RM800+..
*
youngmasterho
post Sep 20 2007, 03:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
there is oso a Sony S310 series which supports 1080p though it's not a full HD panel. wat surprises me is the retailing price of a 32" LCD is sold less than 3000!

QUOTE(redbull_y2k @ Sep 16 2007, 10:17 PM)
Cheapest full HD available currently is the Philips 37PFL7422 37" LCDTV which retails for RM5,499 at Best Denki.  tongue.gif 
user posted image
*
youngmasterho
post Sep 28 2007, 02:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i spotted PS3 on your desktop, mind telling hw much u bought?

seems that your 24" monitors r used for multimedia purpose??

QUOTE(ryderpat @ Sep 26 2007, 06:59 PM)

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0239sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:00 PM