That same thread also says:

---

Added on May 23, 2007, 3:20 pmI would advice you, seeing as how there's so little information on the net, that you email LG directly and ask them if it supports pixel mapping or not.

This post has been edited by bryan: May 23 2007, 03:20 PM

Samsung 226BW user, kindly go through the below link and check wether the C panel are same as the A panel.

http://www.behardware.com/articles/667-1/s...he-verdict.html

TY

great find! thanks....n on the site they compared A panel and S panel...they only briefly mentioned the C Panel.

it was a long read...

but in the end....the difference is too minimal to make so much noise about.

hhmm... seems it may detected by human's eye.
but if come to a situation, will u guys choose to have a sharper pics but slightly smaller the screen, or blurer pics but slightly bigger the screen?

and btw, DELL E228WFP and samsung 226BW, will these 2 LCD have a big step diff between each? coz thier price not really a BIG diff, (probably $300+-)

300 plus not a big difference when the average price of each item is about 1000? That's 30%!

If money is no problem get the Sammy.

But what does the Sammy have better in comparison with the Dell?I know contrast ratio but what does contrast ratio affects?

http://www.behardware.com/articles/662-7/2...ond-coming.html

Read

Model: Samsung 2232GW
Size: 22" Wide
Color support: 16.7M
Pixel Pitch: 0.282mm
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Contrast: 4000:1
Viewing angle: 170/160
Response time: 2ms
Signal Input: D-Sub, DVI-DHDCP, HDCP

WOW.. this is a nice article.. no argue at all already.. i'm reading now..

Yeap, some forumers in the [H]ardForum just spice things up and make a big noise about this S vs A panel comparison ,in the end, I dont see any big different that makes ppl stray away from A and also C panel

Yes S panel is better factory default but NOT MUCH and if you think you got S panel and you have the best LCD, you are wrong, TN panel is still inferior too other panel type like S-IPS, S-PVA bla bla

Thats normal for people who cannot escape from the grey jumping here and
there,exspecially things concern to money.

Oh thanks man.. so i can forget about samsung and go for LG.. even though i prefer samsung's design..

This post has been edited by nicholas_1213: May 23 2007, 08:03 PM

Yea, same as what i was feeling before. I always wanted the 226BW but it seems the difference is minimal and i rather save more..

Hehe, save more for?? anyway what r u using now le? i mean monitor..

i tried on mine...

the service function menu pop out...but the don't have the panel info...so i can't check what panel i'm using...

Oh thanks for the info. Seen some pics before but did not know it was supposed to have a higher contrast ratio. Of course that must be with MagicBright? Any info on what the contrast ratio is without MagicBright?

Also, the back of that monitor is fugly, and doesn't look VESA compatible.

I'm not sure if it's only me or not..
I always feel that the design of Samsung is always failed...

Samsung did made some great looking LCD, but they cost like fark..
Selling point is the design..

Huh don't get your reasoning, first you say design fail, but right after you say they are great looking?

Seems that Samsung is the premier LCD vendor now?

Samsung is still the Best in the market atm eventhough there is a slight differences of the A, S and C panel.

http://www.behardware.com/articles/662-6/2...ond-coming.html



About the LG L226WTQ user, do you all notice very bad ghosting issue?
User from anandtech advised to get the L226WT, w/o Q and with 5ms respond time is better.

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...6&enterthread=y

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...MVIEWTMP=Linear

In a sense of save more for a better GC to power up the monitor..LOL..Anyway, i am using the Samsung 753DFX 17" CRT Monitor.I am sure jumping towards 22" LCD would be a huge step. Its estimated to arrive at 28 May though..