Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Employment Background Check, The Real Deal!

views
     
sweet_pez
post Jun 18 2018, 10:02 AM

何を見ているの
Group Icon
Staff
4,277 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 地獄だ
QUOTE(cubicc @ Jun 15 2018, 01:42 AM)
I have come across a significant number of inquiries pertaining to employment background check by future employer and surprisingly, I found out there are more idiots who offers dumb advice like "why would you lie to your future employer in the first place" or "there is nothing to fear of if you were to reveal the truth" rather than to address the question in the most satisfying manner.

I will try my best to answer all of the FAQ based on my knowledge as to address the matter above.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


If any of the forumers  has questions of the above matter, feel free to drop me a line via this thread.
*
Based on your knowledge meaning you're a HR personnel? Asking out of curiosity.

As for Q1, a junior who is working in an MNC had his background checked before after the interview, before he was offered a position with the firm. The MNC contacted his previous company to look up some things about him. The MNC told him after the ex-employer said something untruthful about my junior and the MNC asked him to clarify on the matter. I'm not sure if he signed any PDPA release form. However, most of the time whereby your refusal to sign this may result in interviewer feeling suspicious that this person may have omitted some past employment details or have something to hide. This will lower the chance of employment, although not 100% of the time.

In Q3-4 you mentioned EPF statement. What about pay slip? IMO anything personal like EPF and payslip, the candidate have the right not to reveal to interviewer. However repercussion as someone mentioned before in a separate thread, is that, the company such as MNCs are not likely to employ you as apparently that's their policy (when they want to confirm you, you'll need to provide pay slip from previous company.

This post has been edited by sweet_pez: Jun 18 2018, 10:03 AM
sweet_pez
post Jun 19 2018, 09:16 AM

何を見ているの
Group Icon
Staff
4,277 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 地獄だ
QUOTE(cubicc @ Jun 18 2018, 05:47 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
QUOTE(KoChun1 @ Jun 18 2018, 10:23 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Both of you have a fair share of view and realistically, I agree with KoChun1. Although with the PDPA act there are companies that follow closely, however, even if there's a breach the candidates will not know unless he/ she is close with the ex-company's HR and the HR division informed the candidate. Even so in this situation, as a candidate, will you report the potential employer? Although the answer is YES, you CAN make a report of this potential employer, rarely anyone do so so save trouble.

Yes my point is that, the candidate can choose NOT to sign the PDPA but this also mean the candidate should look elsewhere for a job. As highlighted, one of the member here mentioned all MNCs require a copy of payslip. If the candidate is not willing to provide, he/she should have little hope in working with MNCs. You can argue that a person has to be "so good" that others will hire them 'unconditionally' overlooking the procedure/ policy they have about the payslip. However there are not many people in this industry who are "that good", if any. Even if you are, probably they're willing to let the person go on the basis he/she is not able to comply with the company's basic policy of providing the payslip. The more resistant a person is, the more suspicious it will appear. This is speaking hypothetically though as I've not seen anyone take up such 'fight' with an MNC. All my friends working in MNCs provided their payslip.

sweet_pez
post Jun 19 2018, 11:00 AM

何を見ているの
Group Icon
Staff
4,277 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 地獄だ
QUOTE(cubicc @ Jun 19 2018, 10:03 AM)
In the name of convenient, people usually failed the system. One may not condone with the act of breaching the privacy of others, but failing to make any report to the authority of a wrong doing would easily proved otherwise. It is not impossible to make changes, it is just not easy. The practice of asking for "pay advice" from a candidate is an act of suppressing the growth of employee's market. The Government has enacted laws to protect the citizens but it means nothing if the citizens do nothing about it.
*
You make a valid point. IMO it goes both ways - for employees to take action and for the government body to provide strong support to such action. Most people avoid filing report as we find it to be a "drastic measure" for a "small matter". Many people do not report crimes, what more of such act. As such is the mentality of Malaysians who are generally on the gentler side of being more forgiving with "it's okay la" behaviour.

QUOTE(Topace111 @ Jun 19 2018, 10:16 AM)
I think global trend is moving towards protection of private data such as remuneration history. For example in US, certain states has already / going to implement a law that prohibits companies to even request for such information. We don’t have such law in MYS. However, these laws are rarely applicable to senior management or boards of directors as disclosure of these executives’ remunerations are considered good corporate governance. You can find out easily how much a CEO of a PLC earning nowadays compared to their GM/VPs.

In US also, the regulators clamp down hard on hidden non-competing clause / cartel arrangements to prevent employee to switch to a competitor unless it’s stated clearly in the offer letter. This happens in tech sector that involves the FANG companies. Just to share that in MYS, banks also have sort of non-competing arrangement in the offer letter. If you are currently working for a bank and wish to jump to another bank, you cannot leave your new bank within 1 year from joining or you may end up paying 6 months’ worth of your salary. It’s a very old banking requirement which Banks still apply to protect their staffs.

In certain industry such as sports, remuneration information is almost always public as the athletes normally have a higher say and bargaining power of where they want to go. Certain companies also make their remuneration data to be highly visible to attract talents to work there.
*
It's true, and mostly done to protect the privacy of individuals (in this case, candidates). Which is why in US the common practice in resume is that candidates do not disclose their religion and photos are usually not attached. They are also not allowed to include in their job description on the preference for certain gender or skin colour. This is to reduce discrimination. However in Malaysia, it's very common to see ads appear as "Preferably male only" or "Priorities for x applicants" etc.

We are still far from reduction of discrimination but in hope, it will improve in future.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0124sec    0.34    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 10:46 AM