Why not RP PVP server? Litany of Fury is on Maelstrom (RP PVP) !

I put on my robe and wizard hat.

Then you go and watch and rot your eyes then 

BTW technically, I know Quazacolt RL now, and in RL he's........

when people can't take their eyes off you, then it rot le..  

And then I remove your Assassination Spaulders, thereby breaking its set bonuses...

Not acting in character on a RP server is an offence?

---

Added on May 24, 2007, 1:51 pmand umm... your guild name.... it can sound kinda vulgar... >:D

LOL. I was amused by the need to string a whole lot of accomplishments to justify going to an RP server.

If i wanted to go to an RP server i would state this. Played WOW for X years, have experienced the whole PvP scenario and frankly am fed up. Please recommend a good RP server with friendly malaysians. Thank you.

If you didnt already grasp the point i was making is that going into an RP server is merely choice. There;s no need to list your "WoW virtual resume" as justification because you dont need to other than for e-peening purposes

Considering that even his rank is now thrown in just reinforces my point further.

I'm not sure what is your relationship with the poster but you are getting a little ruffled by this. Relax, this is merely a game.

Unless you work in Blizzard and are one of the developers probably. If you are merely a user then you are on the other end of the spectrum. A consumer, a gamer, probably using your tweaked up machine from a loan from Momma to feed your obsession.

Don't think you're a WoW Developer with blizzard, so yes it's still very much a game.

You can laugh it off if you like. The point is you mocked someone, I pointed out a fact that you have missed, you made a passing assumption, and you made an ass out of yourself.

You still haven't understood my reply have you? A tip perhaps. Less WoW and a bit more reading should improve comprehension in due time. I would stop embarassing myself if i were you and consider re-reading my post carefully.

added:

For the love of God....PMS refers to the whole behavioural, emotional rollercoaster some women go through normally linked to hormonal changes due to their approaching cycle....and yes...really...NO bleeding is involved.

really...NONE

Less WoW and a bit more reading should improve comprehension and general knowledge too in due time

I'm sure you figured it all out, so leave us to our foolishness eh, stefan?

/sigh

Was an interesting thread too...

/PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!!

Not sure how u can have a relationship with a stranger.

He didn't mean to be sarcastic in his post. Being presumptious on that part kinda squashed ur "Mr.Ojectivitivity" image ?

---

Added on May 25, 2007, 3:01 pm

I tend to believe individuals are unique. I could be wrong from your perspective. So if you think ur gonna word urs like that so be it. Listing your credentials during job application is a no-no to u too? A similar principle could be drawn here but u probably beg to differ.

Unfortunately as a Shaman all I can say is:

"You cannot do that while you're stunned."

still got last stand + shield wall ur willy till it turns soft.

i'm just surprised it got this far. There is a little button known as !Report. >.>

1. For the benefit of others:

application:

Q: "What is your relationship with the defendant?"

A: He is my father.

or

Q: "What is your relationship with the poster?"

A: Don't know 'em. He's just the guy that orders an expresso to go every morning.
2. His obvious use of the term MR. Objectivity (or subjectivity though erroneous) in the context of the statement......you know what.... nvm

/cast lvl 10 eroticism on Quaza's willy.

Ok, its hard again!

Actually, thats just proper english (well..  how english was taught in my day anyways) and I don't know how you came about with this silly notion that i implied that you are related with the poster? It was a neutral question and phrased as such to add weight as to why you seem so eager to defend the OP.. if you have doubts please refer to your English Lit lecturer or pick up a grammar book. This is in no way an insult, please do not misintepret again.

The realisation that you're only in your 3rd year of law and that I'm practically more than a decade older, makes me feel rather stupid for even trying to argue (or point out errors in syntax) with youth.

This is just a classic case of miscommunication further compounded with the fact that we're generations apart.

so good day... peace out or whatever hip words you guys use these days then.

Quaza, I think he got confused me with you now.
Again, all I did was pointed out something obvious that you have missed, in a polite manner of "my dear sir". How is that "seem so eager to defend the OP"? That is the core of the matter, not you bashing my English. I do not take offence to that at all. Even if I am related to the OP (which I reiterate again that I am not), how is my remark any less true? You have missed something glaringly obvious in your post in mocking the OP, all I did was point it out (he did not need to list his PvP achievements because it's in his sig).

By the way, using the age thing is very e-thug. It's just a few steps above "my dad can beat up your dad" and a few steps below Godwin's Law. I don't know how old you are, but it really has no bearing in this matter.

In any case, we can agree that the matter has been way overblown. Let's drop the matter completely, as the OP probably would be rolling his eyes in getting so much "spam" in a request for information.

why do u?

Awwwwwwwwww     

I would not play the age card if I were you. Being older than someone on the Internet does not give you more credibility when making jabs at a "younger" person than you. In fact, you would end up looking worse off just because you started an argument on the Internet. We are all behind pseudonyms on the Internet, so naturally people do get ballsy when making statements.

There are no age gaps on the Internet.
Then don't.

Just my 2 cents, don't be too offended for stating a usually unspoken rule in forum debates.

u disagree?

u can agree to disagree, but don't disagree to agree.