DotA was never their game.  They don't earn a single dime from it.

People just buy pirated WC3 or download a bootleg copy, then download the freeware DotA... no money for Blizzard.  Unless they support it on Battle.Net, which I haven't bothered checking... I dont like DotA, it killed WC3 RTS.  Just like how I hate Counter-Strike, for killing REAL FPS.[I][U]

In terms of basic gameplay details, Starcraft II will be what vice president of game design Rob Pardo calls "a true sequel to Starcraft." The sequel is confirmed to only feature the original three playable races from the previous games: the protoss, the zerg, and the terrans; there will be no fourth race, not even the zerg/protoss hybrid which appeared in a mission in Brood War. There will also be no hero characters, unlike in Blizzard's last RTS, 2002's Warcraft III. Instead, the sequel will be very much about what Pardo calls "mass armies"--large groups of units doing battle at once. Pardo has pointed out that unlike previous Blizzard games, Starcraft II will have no "selection limit"--that is, you'll be able to click and drag your mouse to select an unlimited number of your own armies to control.

The graphics are not that cutting edge as mentioned earlier in the forum, and there seem to be no physice in the game there isnt really a 3-d effect like sup com where missiles planes carriers fly at different altitude.
Do you play that game.

I did see that happening but that I believe is just an eye-candy and if you have a unit there where the debries slide down I doubt there will be any effect on them. Thats why I say the physics in the game is just for eye candy unlike Sup Com.

I thought half-life 2 is jim randall physics and not havoc physics?