graphically, can it better than supreme commander, COH, and CNC3?
this is DX10 or DX9 game?
This post has been edited by dattebayo: May 20 2007, 08:02 PM
RTS Starcraft 2, New Units with Video and Explanation.
RTS Starcraft 2, New Units with Video and Explanation.
|
|
May 20 2007, 08:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
graphically, can it better than supreme commander, COH, and CNC3?
this is DX10 or DX9 game? This post has been edited by dattebayo: May 20 2007, 08:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 20 2007, 08:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Araes @ May 20 2007, 08:05 PM) PS 2.0, so those without SM 3.0 card won't have to cry. a bit dissapointed though can't fully utilized newer hardware yii~~ QUOTE Will StarCraft II take advantage of DirectX 10? What other graphical goodies are included? The game will be compatible with DirectX 10, and we're still considering whether there will be exclusive DirectX 10 graphic effects, but the graphics engine will also be very scalable to ensure that a wide range of different systems will be capable of running StarCraft II. The new engine is also capable of rendering very large units, as well as large numbers of units on screen together. Havok physics have been integrated into the engine for added realism as well. http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/790/790147p1.html This post has been edited by dattebayo: May 20 2007, 08:22 PM |
|
|
May 20 2007, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(slickz @ May 20 2007, 09:08 PM) 300 units at once? that's not counting all the projectiles flying around by every unit, and all the shrapnels.... all reacting to physics? It sounds like a GC's nightmare to run at full settings. ya... that;s why a multi-core proc. and stream processing based GC is for...by that time my 8800gts will have something to work for This post has been edited by dattebayo: May 20 2007, 09:45 PM |
|
|
May 21 2007, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
May 21 2007, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(NicJolin @ May 21 2007, 12:08 AM) should be ok coz its dx9 card. But i think it will be very lag to play even on 800*600QUOTE(Kelv @ May 21 2007, 12:12 AM) ya no prob... of course not the ultra high settings |
|
|
May 21 2007, 02:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
diablo 3 not even anoounced yet
dotard... lol what a great name |
|
|
Jan 1 2008, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
if there's no clear release date announced after the end of 2007, i bet the game will only be out after Q2 2008
This post has been edited by dattebayo: Jan 1 2008, 12:36 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0174sec
0.85
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 08:17 PM |