The graphics look kinda like low standard compare to today's games.So,i shouldn't expect to see ragdoll physics in SC2.Anyway,i care more about gameplay than graphics.

Also,please not DotA 2 in SC2.

Actually, that's what im trying to say. They play CNC3 because their chances to win is higher. They cant play SC and WC which is older and have 10x more player base than any other games. SC and WC3 is very competitive. Every year we'll hear new pro coming to the scene. For those quite new in WC3,
"Long time ago before the age of sky and far bfore the reign of orc Emperor Grubby, a Human called Insomnia rule this world".
Ok enough joke, what im trying to say is dont compare the competitive WC3 scene with Malaysian WC3 scene where Paulyan won wcg 5 yr straight.

There's player called kenshin.WERRA who quits WC3 and play SC because he wants challenge.This is true GOSU.

Why SC gosus are different from other games gosus?
First, all 10++ members of 7++ teams in starleague are professional. What i mean by professional is they play for food. They play 10++ hours per day to achieve perfection(a genius cant excecute his strat  without skill). They dont win they dont eat. They gave up other responsibilities in their life(time, college) to become a professional gamer.

Ok, that's for those who play in Starleague. But these days there are new rule which says you cant compete in Starleague if you're not a progamer. So now progamer is a given title. So even if they play for food they're still not progamer without recognition and Starleague is a no. In korea there are lots of these progamer without recognition. Ppl said to qualify in Korean WCG qualifier is harder than winning WCG grand final itself.

Let say Dawn of War for example, how many top 30 ladder player are progamer?I think most of them are hardcore player that plays for fun and happens to be good at it.

Thats why i said other RTS besides SC and WC3 dont have any gosu. They cant set a standard for their game like SC and WC3 pro did. In my opinion its not blizzard that made SC such a perfect game. Its the gosus that create the balance. Blizzard just implement it with every patch.
TBH im not so sure wether most of those koreans will go SC2 or they will remain with  SC. SC2 can become the next CS:source you know.

Dawn of War has them, C&C has had them for ages (You think Tanya comes of a conveyor belt?). Don't write off the concept just because one company screwed up the implementation.

The main thing is they shouldn't have make the heroes much stronger than the normal units.Active or Passive spells doesn't matter much if the heroes arent overpower in the first place.

Active spells that attacks unit is what make Heroes in WC3 that powerful. Not to mention how much element in WC3 is focused on Heroes. Even the upkeep system in WC3 is indirectly forcing player to use heroes as massing units become inefficient.

What I mean is they should only make heroes act as 'catalyst' in a fleet. Heroes can't go alone fighting, and a strong army can't be efficient without a hero nearby. They plays a big role in skirmishes but only if they're backed up by a properly managed fleet.