Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
RTS Starcraft 2, New Units with Video and Explanation.
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 11:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(jones007 @ May 29 2007, 06:05 PM) as long as the graphic is good + good game play is good enough. why bother the physics thingy and bla bla. QUOTE(sniperz @ May 30 2007, 10:36 AM) starcraft 2's graphic is assumingly great. cant wait to see the demos The graphics are not that cutting edge as mentioned earlier in the forum, and there seem to be no physice in the game there isnt really a 3-d effect like sup com where missiles planes carriers fly at different altitude. QUOTE(radkliler @ May 30 2007, 09:19 AM) So far the only game which uses physics as a part of the game is SupCom...the rest are most probably eye candy. Do you play that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
N30rang3r
|
May 30 2007, 11:29 AM
|
|
For comparison of the game looks; I don't really think they have improved the graphic quality although they tweaked most of it to an acceptable level. For all SC and SC2 Fans; we're not here to look at how impressive the graphic quality SC series but to enjoy the game itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 12:00 PM
|
|
Definately, I wanna see what tyhe koreans come up with. But I hope they dun copy everything from Sup Com and CnC3, they've coppied enuf for the Demo already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dos
|
May 30 2007, 12:09 PM
|
Getting Started

|
I just watched the gameplay video. The graphics looked better than the screenshots. Also the physics is just eye-candy at the moment like when the units get destroyed, they break into little pieces and slide around depending on terrain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bandwidthsucker
|
May 30 2007, 12:36 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(dos @ May 30 2007, 12:09 PM) I just watched the gameplay video. The graphics looked better than the screenshots. Also the physics is just eye-candy at the moment like when the units get destroyed, they break into little pieces and slide around depending on terrain. Can't Wait to get it
|
|
|
|
|
|
CZero
|
May 30 2007, 12:50 PM
|
|
Wow, thanks ubhm. You sure are SC-maniac, aren't u? Hmm, I think I hv heard bout the Blizzard making the FPS-type SC long time ago. Am I right? Or am I getting noob??
|
|
|
|
|
|
slickz
|
May 30 2007, 12:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ May 30 2007, 11:07 AM) The graphics are not that cutting edge as mentioned earlier in the forum, and there seem to be no physice in the game there isnt really a 3-d effect like sup com where missiles planes carriers fly at different altitude. Do you play that game. didnt see the part where the debris slide down the ramps, did you? Starcraft 2 will have Havok physics implemented. Yup. The same kind implemented in far cry, half life 2 etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 01:49 PM
|
|
QUOTE(slickz @ May 30 2007, 12:54 PM) didnt see the part where the debris slide down the ramps, did you? Starcraft 2 will have Havok physics implemented. Yup. The same kind implemented in far cry, half life 2 etc. I did see that happening but that I believe is just an eye-candy and if you have a unit there where the debries slide down I doubt there will be any effect on them. Thats why I say the physics in the game is just for eye candy unlike Sup Com. I thought half-life 2 is jim randall physics and not havoc physics?
|
|
|
|
|
|
H@H@
|
May 30 2007, 01:53 PM
|
I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
|
QUOTE(slickz @ May 30 2007, 12:54 PM) didnt see the part where the debris slide down the ramps, did you? Starcraft 2 will have Havok physics implemented. Yup. The same kind implemented in far cry, half life 2 etc. And how does that affect gameplay exactly? Age of Empires 3 and Rise of Legends had the exact same thing (Large units and buildings would have debris fall around) but it was just eye candy as it didn't affect anything in the game. Now, if the falling debris of units in Starcraft 2 could crush or damage smaller units, or maybe become obstacles, then maybe it will be useful (Kamikaze Battlecruisers!), but as far as I could tell from the videos, can't really tell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 02:11 PM
|
|
I hope that the gameplay is not as bad as RoL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aoshi_88
|
May 30 2007, 02:11 PM
|
|
If it was like CoH...
Imagine a flaming Battlecruiser crashing into a Protoss Warp Gate killing any newly spawned units and damaging the Warp Gate itself... 1337!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 02:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Aoshi_88 @ May 30 2007, 02:11 PM) If it was like CoH... Imagine a flaming Battlecruiser crashing into a Protoss Warp Gate killing any newly spawned units and damaging the Warp Gate itself... 1337!!! That is possible for Sup Com. This post has been edited by fujkenasai: May 30 2007, 02:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lazo
|
May 30 2007, 02:46 PM
|
|
Playing C&C3 now while waiting for SC2  wonder when will SC2 out
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 02:52 PM
|
|
Are you really a gal? If you are then you need to ask your female friends to join too, RTS really need female players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
slickz
|
May 30 2007, 05:11 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ May 30 2007, 01:49 PM) I did see that happening but that I believe is just an eye-candy and if you have a unit there where the debries slide down I doubt there will be any effect on them. Thats why I say the physics in the game is just for eye candy unlike Sup Com. I thought half-life 2 is jim randall physics and not havoc physics? er? jim randall physics? google didnt even bring up anything lol. half life 2 is havok ler Sauce
|
|
|
|
|
|
t3chn0m4nc3r
|
May 30 2007, 05:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ May 30 2007, 03:52 PM) Are you really a gal? If you are then you need to ask your female friends to join too, RTS really need female players. haha... unfortunately gals find RTS 2 complicated...  only nerdy gals love RTS...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheesenium
|
May 30 2007, 05:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(slickz @ May 30 2007, 12:54 PM) didnt see the part where the debris slide down the ramps, did you? Starcraft 2 will have Havok physics implemented. Yup. The same kind implemented in far cry, half life 2 etc. CoH also use the same physics engine.So far,Havok is still the best.The only other physics engine i know is Karma,used by UT2004 and UT3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fujkenasai
|
May 30 2007, 06:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(slickz @ May 30 2007, 05:11 PM) er? jim randall physics? google didnt even bring up anything lol. half life 2 is havok ler SauceOk so Im wrong but why sauce? QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ May 30 2007, 05:30 PM) haha... unfortunately gals find RTS 2 complicated...  only nerdy gals love RTS...  Thats why I love nerdy gals, they are hard to find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
slickz
|
May 30 2007, 07:16 PM
|
|
sauce is a slang for source my friend. yea lol nerdy gals are nice, as long as they are friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jones007
|
May 30 2007, 10:40 PM
|
|
dude i dont get the havok physics wat wat physics. lol damn
|
|
|
|
|