should've just scrap everything and focus on World of Warcraft if you're gonna say like that.

Why?Whats wrong with SC2?

I got a feeling that this guy got owned badly in original SC...

And play so much DotA that Venomancer is Hydralisk clone...

Food for thought

Yeah,could be just another Teok Phew's kind.

should have develop SC3 instead of that worthless Diablo 3

lol, y dont develop all. and no more fighting

SC2 RULESSSSS....

Get out of here....SC2 rules here
bad experience with SC?
too bad.......it rocks

SC2 doesn't rules. Coz' its not out yet. Who knows, it might not be as popular as the original.

anti-climax

lol, when i play dota,

me: hero ms
teamate: which hero?
me: that hydra?
teamate: what??
me: i cant recall the hero's name
teamate: ......

some of them don't even know a paladin, death knight ...the actual character in WC3..
no need to mention bout the character from SC..

Walau ... dun lar bring Dota here lor ... this is SC2 lar we are talking abt ...

I think you shoudn't be comparing SC2 with Hellgate:London as SC2 is RTS and Hellgate is a FPS (or is it FPS/RPG ?). I mean both games are from two different worlds apart, I'm not too wise on hardware requirement for a particular genre as in like there's a different requirement for FPS as compared to a RTS.

Should be comparing SC2 with C&C3's requirements. I'm sure almost everyone here was able to play C&C3 right, well if not in max settings? C&C3 didn't like demand those computers used in Nasa to run the game, i tried running the game on a 6600GT and AMD single core on mid settings, didn't lag at all.

I think its business strategy from Blizzard if they choose to do SC2 to be able to run on middle range PCs. Not everyone is rich enough to get a 8800 series (high end) and would opt to get a 8600 series (mid range) instead.

I dunno, its just my 2 cents

This post has been edited by TheWhacker: Sep 19 2007, 10:39 PM

what's up? cant wait to play SC2. anyone knows when it will be available?

The main reason i compare SC2 to Hellgate is because Hellgate is made by ex-Blizzard employer.Both developer share the same idea.They want their game to run on the widest range of PC as possible.

Besides,i doubt that SC2 gonna have C&C3's system requirement.It will be too low for a game in 2008.

It's just my 2 cents.

I think SC2 is more suitable than Diablo 3. Since its long overdue for Starcraft to have a sequel.

Seconded that,Diabloe 2 just came out at early 2000 and it's about time for a sequel for SC2 to be released.

Hell, its about time.

I will give it another 1 1/2 year for it to finally release.