QUOTE(y2ou @ May 26 2021, 04:14 PM)
Bought a QN90A 55 inch earlier and it has been good except few problems which I find it to be poor on Samsung part. Review will be based on the quality and also the price point of the TV.

First of all , thank you for sharing the sub-pixel structure which is in line with my experience .
The un-even shape of the rectangles clearly shows this is an BOE manufactured ADS pixel structure , which means Samsung representative who claimed their TV is using VA panel is wrong about their very own product .
How pathetic .
At the same time , I have contacted Samsung spare-parts .This is the replacement product code they have given me which has once again proven they are wrong .
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
This is a MINI-LED , ADS / IPS based TV , not the VA type which was reviewed by Rtings.
And Samsung PR and CS or the technical team , please spend more time learning about your very own product .
To people who have accused me of being wrong , I hope the evidence is enough to clear up all the confusion .
QUOTE
5. Biggest gripe is review from other country is VA panel yet our Malaysia unit will have inferior ADS/IPS panel. The biggest switch and bait which until now Samsung Malaysia did not specify during the writing of this review. Photo as proof. Don't know what else Samsung did not disclose. Basically an QN85A with QN90A price.
Actually they did , via their spec sheets . Listed as " wide viewing angles " , VA is usually listed as " Ultra wide " . They took the whole specification from Samsung HQ of Korea and UK but their CS , Technical department , PR keep telling others it is VA because what they did was googling to rtings . They don't exactly know what is the difference between two . They have not even seen the TV I bet ya .
The 65 " I measured in homedec expo has a 2200 nits rating so it is a really bright TV . Unfortunately the black level still leave a lot to be desired .
This post has been edited by Convael: May 26 2021, 06:48 PM