QUOTE(cardin @ Mar 31 2009, 06:19 PM)
yup...4Mbps = 512KBps...anywy...do u think UL = 512Kbps is enough for DL = 4.0Mbps? sims like not really stable...
Fixed for accuracy. Streamyx The Unofficial Streamyx 4Mbps Users Club V1, Combo RM 160 Per Month *Updated Info*
|
|
Mar 31 2009, 07:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2009, 01:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(Suk @ May 24 2009, 12:58 PM) I feel 218 IP's can compete with Jaring now, in term of Latency.. Only for 218.111 IP, others still fcuked upNow I can see 100ms to JP 230ms to LA 280ms to Chicago Last time TM always extra 100ms higher compare v Jaring. Now they are all same. Do I mean TM is getting better now ? Yes and hopefully. |
|
|
Jun 14 2009, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(red-queen @ Jun 14 2009, 06:03 PM) how long does it usually take for the 4Mbps to be activated? TM point said 1 week. but it's been 2 weeks plus and i don't seem to be getting the premium IP. i think i'm going to call tm.nuts on monday to check if i'm already on 4Mbps package or not. But if you request to cap the speed higher like to 5Mbps, it'll go beyond 512KB/sec.Added on June 14, 2009, 6:08 pm streamyx is 4Mbps = 4 Megabit/sec. it is not 4 Megabytes/sec. the download that is shown in the screenshot is 437KiloBytes/sec. 1 bit = 8 bytes. so take 4096kilobits/8 = 512KiloBytes is the fastest speed taht you can get. so getting 437 out of 512 is good already. you don't expect to be getting constant 512KB all the way. Like prasys do. 4.2Mbps he's enjoying now.. |
|
|
Jun 14 2009, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(yjwong @ Jun 14 2009, 06:56 PM) I think sometimes TMNet does seem to over-cap the bandwidth. For example, I'm on a 1 Mbps plan (and thus theoretical speed = 128 KB/s), but I often get sustained speeds of over 170 KB/s. My speedtest.net result does also show that my download speed averages to around 1.5 Mbps. Yeap, it's the technic TM is using to shut their customers mouth. by giving them extra bandwidth. |
|
|
Jun 18 2009, 06:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
Is Sandakan covered with 4Mbps service?
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 08:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
Sabar guys, 4Mbps will be available nationwide soon!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2009, 06:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
TM is unfair!
Only 4Mbps get premium IP a.k.a 218.111.x.x IP.. |
|
|
Jun 24 2009, 07:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2009, 07:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2009, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(Acrisius @ Jun 24 2009, 07:31 PM) Okays..Added on June 24, 2009, 7:36 pmOkay I heard that. She stated that it's only maintainence. Not upgrading core network. The upgrading completed the day before yesterday. This post has been edited by fabianz03: Jun 24 2009, 07:36 PM |
|
|
Jun 28 2009, 08:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(lesleyloke @ Jun 26 2009, 01:48 PM) finally solve my high ping/latency and slow connection problem ^^ Erm.The tm technician call me to cask me change the DSL modulation to G.DMT will get stable connection and lower latency compare with multimode/ADSL2/ADSL2+/ADSL2+M if anyone having high ping and slow connection problem can try to change it for getting stable and lower latency ^^ ![]() since some ppl pm me for more detail about this issue, i will brief more i am using the linksys wag200g I automatic get ADSL2+ before changing to G.dmt I already complain many time because the slow connection and high latency. The tm technician this morning just call me and asking me about my modem brand and some setting in modem include the modulation~~~ after that he asking me to change ADSL2+ to G.dmt mode because the ADSL2/ADSL2+ is still not stable been used for some area and he say G.dmt can support line speed maximum to 8mbps and tm currently still most using g.dmt modulation so change it to G.dmt sure will no problem and the speed will be more stable and latency should be low. SNR also will improve ^^ There's no g.dmt in my router modulation Help me please. |
|
|
Jun 30 2009, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 03:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
QUOTE(MX510 @ Jul 9 2009, 10:41 AM) Upgrade lah bro Holy f***!# ping www.gov.cn PING wac.edgecastcdn.net (117.18.237.20): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=46.029 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=46.800 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=45.930 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=45.553 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=46.264 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=47.461 ms 64 bytes from 117.18.237.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=47.145 ms ^C --- wac.edgecastcdn.net ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 45.553/46.455/47.461/0.645 ms # Try pinging to Xunlei.com and gougou.com Let us see the results |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
What the f***???
I'm driving to TMPoint now.. Oh wait. There's no such thing as 4Mbps in my area... |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 04:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
2Mbps also no premium IP.
Do not want! |
|
|
Jul 10 2009, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2009, 09:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
^ all of your pings and speed are normal.
But for 1Mbps users like me, I'm crawling for that speed. |
|
|
Aug 1 2009, 08:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2009, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0414sec
0.68
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 09:48 AM |